Times of Israel: The eBook begins with a list: women live longer than men, have a more powerful immune system, are less likely to develop developmental disorders, are more likely to see the global in a wider variety of colors, fight cancer better. Have you scrambled some readers’ feathers?
Moalem: I discovered that other angry people tend to take this personally. Survival no longer gains advantages from women being behavioral; I know it’s genetic, so if you’re still in the big vision, it’s your fault if you don’t live long and healthy, you didn’t go to the doctor, you didn’t eat well, you took too many risks, you used drugs, you fed on alcohol or tobacco; understandably to have uncovered the e-book offensive.
If you still think it’s your fault if you don’t live long and healthy . . . it’s understandable that you locate the offensive ebook
In fact, it is precisely the opposite of my message that we will have to do much more to care for men because they were born at such a disadvantage, unfortunately this is what we are seeing with COVID. now 2. 4 times higher when adjusting age.
Initially, there were items suggesting that they were due to behavior, as men smoke more or drink more.
In fact, at first, other people said that [the mortality rate with COVID-19] will have to be [related to] behavior because in China, 60% of men smoke and only 3% of women smoke. And then we saw the same mortality rate regardless of smoking. In fact, you’re a little if you smoke, to the point that in the ICU there are clinical trials that use nicotine patches.
Only when they learned that if 60% of men in China smoke but only 10 or 20% of ICU men were smokers, it is clearly not behavioral. Fortunately, other people followed him. So it just shows you that if we get caught up in this behavioral perspective, it anchors us in a negative way, which prevents us from de creating new therapies.
According to their research, women are more likely to produce antibodies. Is this something pharmaceutical corporations are for when they propose COVID treatments and vaccines?
No, you’re not seeing that.
When it comes to clinical trials, women are not included in a sufficient number to give us an idea of what is happening Part of the explanation is that it is more difficult to recruit women of childbearing potential for clinical trials, where men show up. .
So all of our children’s vaccines are the same for everyone?What effect does this have on us?
Women will have more side effects from vaccines because they have such a competitive immune system. The merit is that the vaccine is much more likely to be absorbed by women than by men.
The male immune formula is like a pacifist compared to the female formula when it comes to getting an immune reaction. You have to get men’s attention to have a reaction to a vaccine. We realize that men, especially as they age, probably will. wants a booster shot for each and every vaccine a woman wants.
The male immune formula is like a pacifist for the female formula when it comes to getting an immune response.
After reading his book, it turns out that the dose of medications is much more accurate than, say, “adults take two pills each and every four to 6 hours and young people under the age of 12 take one. “
I think long-term generations will look back and say, “How did they think they were more specific?”You go to a shoe store, you ask your size, you make things stay for you.
We know that at least part of the drugs we prescribe paints on a man’s body and a woman’s body, but we still administer the same dose.
I think a bartender has a bigger concept of how drugs paint between the sexes than the doctor in your family circle. It’s not the doctor’s fault; Pharmaceutical corporations do not administer a genuine sex-based dose because the law does not require it. Until the FDA enacts it, you’ll never see that happen, because it would be nearly double the final drug progression charge.
Can you tell us a little bit about how women enjoy the side effects of drugs more than men, but that many doctors reject their complaints?
We have an overdose of women. When it comes to breaking down poisons into drugs, the female formula is much slower. All the calculations we do for the time of absorption of the drug are based on the male body. We simply transfer everything we are told about men to women and hope. It works We were very lucky. I would advocate a separate but absolutely parallel approval procedure for men and women.
I think a bartender has a broader concept of how drugs paint between the sexes than your family circle, Doctor.
Do women pay the courage to have a more potent immune formula for COVID-19?
Yes, the value women will pay for and won’t have a serious infection is called prolonged COVID. This appears to be a persistent autoimmune reaction after COVID-19. Women almost revel in chronic fatigue or fibromyalgia. They’re not recovering.
How do we use what you have discovered in your studies to help genetic men and women?
Both sexes gain advantages from more research. We can only examine one sex to help another if we settle for the underlying differences that we cannot replace and that have a biological origin.
The morbidity women face from autoimmune diseases is quite severe, with lupus the ratio is 9: 1, with muscular dystrophy is 4: 1, all those situations make life unbearable. We want to see how men don’t expand those situations.
Behavior aside, if we settle for fundamental biological differences, if we see that the male immune formula is pacifist by nature, which does not turn against itself, then we can think about how to apply this pacifism to female physiology.