With the general election from November 3 to just a few weeks, President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden are giving their latest speeches to American voters.
While a number of challenges have been at the heart of our election speech, to the fullest it comes down to how prospective management would deal with the most urgent challenge of that era: the COVID-19 epidemic.
In 2020, the virus interrupted everything, seeping through all facets of life, from education, socializing with enjoyment and exposing inequalities in our fitness formula to the president’s own fitness.
For the most part, the existing presidential election is based on a referendum on the country’s reaction and how it will respond to this public aptitude crisis in the future.
As the risk of coronavirus continues to sweep in the United States, does the U. S. electorate stick to the federal government’s random reaction or do something different?
Throughout the presidential campaign, Biden and his running mate, Senator Kamala Harris, said their reaction to COVID-19 would mark a deflection from what has been noticed so far in Trump’s management this year.
They focus on the use of science and the experience of public fitness officials, the use of protective masks and the commitment to interact with the rest of the world to locate responses to this pandemic.
“I think, in general, the ‘Achilles heel’ in our reaction is the lack of a federal strategy to advise us through this pandemic,” Dr. Amanda D. Castel, MPH, senior lecturer in the Department of Epidemiology at Milken Institute School of Public Aptitude at George Washington University, said Healthline.
“My view of [Biden-Harris’s] plan is that it’s not revolutionary or anything like that, it’s just the fundamental paintings of public health. Not that we don’t know how to do this,” Dr. Ira B added. Wilson, professor and director of the Department of Health, Policy and Practice Services at Brown University School of Public Health, and professor of medicine at Alpert Medical School.
Castel and Wilson discussed the campaign’s seven-point plan to “beat COVID-19. “Here they express in percentage their assessment of the plan with Healthline.
Biden’s crusade suggests that the United States will react to COVID-19 testing and tracking.
This includes doubling the number of driving control sites in the country; Invest in expanding the current account, adding home, and quick verification; and the status quo of a Pandemic Review Board inspired by President Franklin D’s War Production Council. Roosevelt World War II.
The council boosted the production of tanks, uniforms and materials during the war, and Biden and Harris imagined using the same technique to mass-produce and distribute “tens of millions of tests,” according to the campaign’s website.
They also plan to create a U. S. Public Health Employment Corps. But it’s not the first time To organize approximately 100,000 Americans across the country to help seek contacts, especially in high-risk communities neglected through the federal government.
While COVID-19 is furious, fitness experts have consistently criticized the Trump administration’s lack of physical power and tracking. This technique is what Wilson calls the “tracking fiasco. “
He added that Biden-Harris’ technique is not “complicated or controversial” for those who “know something about public health. “
Wilson explained that, as with everything in this existing era, the reaction to COVID-19 has become very politicized.
What deserves to be objectively noted as an aptitude crisis that required independent attention from the federal government has a factor divided between Republican and Democratic political lines.
The states that least support this administration, especially those whose leaders politically oppose the president, have been poorly served.
“Most federal governments don’t care if it’s a ‘red or blue state’. They’re worried about ‘American states. ‘ In fact, top presidents know that Puerto Rico, for example, is a component of the U. S. government,” Wilson said.
Castel said the plan provides “a wonderful starting point” to expand testing and tracking capability. She said what she wants to happen, however, is for the government to make sure that other people who don’t have easy-to-prove resources get it.
Castel under pressure that the proposed testing and tracking framework of another 100,000 people will have to be strongly connected and unified in its responsiveness. They want to be able to succeed in other people temporarily and destigmatize the politicized reaction to COVID-19 so that other people percentage data about the other people they have been in contact with and when they might have been exposed.
“This in itself is a challenge,” he says.
The central point of the Democratic Party candidate’s plan is to increase the production of PPE. The focus would be on federal guidance, rather than the existing objective, which was to allow states how they would provide the mandatory PPE themselves.
The campaign states that a potential Biden administration “would make full use of the Defense Production Act,” increasing the domestic production capacity of PPE such as masks and face shields, with the country’s general supply exceeding demand.
This would mean that stores, public stocks, and fitness services would be fully stocked and would also prepare for long-term pandemics and public fitness crises.
The purpose would be “to build now toward a future, flexible, US-sourced, manufactured capacity to make sure we don’t have other countries in crisis,” he says.
Wilson said that, once again, this will be the popular public aptitude reaction of any country to a pandemic.
He said he asks questions such as “how do you expect how many enthusiasts will be available, how do you make sure you have a national PPE reserve, how ground production moves to the US. But it’s not the first time To make sure the PPE is there in case of a problem. “‘crisis’ is all for a government.
Wilson added that if mass production and the ibility of PPE had been imposed from the start, it could have helped Americans return to work, giving them masks and protective appliances that would have allowed them to “protect themselves and continue working. “
The third detail of the plan calls for “consistent, evidence-based national guidance” on how others across the country can respond to the pandemic, adding executives that schools, small businesses, families, and network centers can follow.
While the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has presented recommendations for food service and nightlife, schools, businesses, and workplaces, this message has been diluted through President Trump’s first public mockery of physical estating and masking, as well as comments. being in itself a ‘deception’.
States had to intervene to improvise their own protocols and rules on how teachers can simply reintegrate schools or prohibit homeowners from simply being able to open their business safely in the face of the pandemic.
The Biden plan insists that the federal government would establish a “revolving fund” for state and local governments in their budgets, which may lead in a different way to cuts in early responders and educators.
A possible Biden administration would also touch Congress to approve an emergency package to ensure that certain schools have the right resources, and would also make small business owners larger to reduce their operating prices to buy plexiglass or protective masks, for example.
Castel said this nationally oriented thing would be “extremely important. “
“It would be nice to see if he [Biden] can bring governors and mayors in combination to have the opportunity for percentages of learned classes and more productive practices and then say how we continue nationally,” Castel added.
He explained that any reaction from management would be sensitive to how other countries provided federal government to local communities. Which country has succeeded, which has failed, and how can we be informed of these other models?
Wilson said a challenge for a Biden-led government would be to repair confidence in the CDC.
As with major nonpartisan agencies of Trump’s years, the CDC has become so politicized that confidence in its ability to protect the country’s public aptitude has been questioned through some groups.
“The CDC has been invaded by politicians to the point that I’m not convinced that what I hear is based on science,” Wilson said. “We’ve noticed so many times in recent months of political interference in what the CDC is doing. “
The fourth detail of Biden-Harris COVID-19’s reaction plan is one of the most crucial: it focuses on the distribution of vaccines once they are available.
He asked for a $25 billion investment in a vaccine production and distribution plan that would ensure that all Americans get one at no cost. The proposal states that “policy plays no role in determining the protection and efficacy of a vaccine”.
In the end, the plan states that a Biden administration will entrust scientists with the duty of all vaccine decisions, clinical knowledge for any vaccine approved through the Food and Drug Administration will be published, and Administration scientists will prepare a written report for the public. appearing before Congress to “speak publicly uncensoredly. “
The Biden-Harris plan also states that all Americans, not just the “rich and well-connected,” have the COVID-19 coverage they need, and “consumers are not being intimidated as new drugs are released. “
Wilson warned that, as with consultation of national reaction rules in COVID-19, it is very important that CDC is confident in launching a vaccine.
“We built this gem of a resource and now we are undermining and ignoring it, and we want it when we plan a vaccine,” he added.
Castel said that this component of the plan will have to be implemented with excessive care, she under pressure that this must be done for all Americans to get the vaccine loose, and that a new administration will have to do everything in its forcing it to make some “fair distribution. “
Communities most vulnerable to COVID-19 will have to be prioritized, and a significant amount of education and literacy around a vaccine will have to evolve to succeed where they “don’t do it with vaccines,” he added.
This next component of the plan would identify a “COVID-19 Working Group on Racial and Ethnic Disparities,” proposed through Harris, that would provide recommendations on how to address public and economic fitness disparities in a COVID-19 reaction for vulnerable communities. .
The crusade indicates that once this express public fitness crisis is over, this working group will remain in its position and switch to a “Working Group on Racial Disparities in Infectious Diseases,” which has recently held its position in our federal government.
In addition, Biden management would create a national online pandemic control panel so Americans can seamlessly obtain real-time data on local transmission rates in their zip codes.
“This information is essential for everyone, but especially older Americans and other high-risk people, perceive the precautionary point to be taken,” according to the plan.
Castel echoed his previous point on vaccine distribution: vulnerable communities, poor communities, and communities of color have a great need for greater federal awareness of relief and reaction to COVID-19.
Within these vulnerable groups, older adults are at the greatest threat of more serious illnesses.
Wilson added that this is far from a “controversial” or revolutionary proposition. It follows common-sense public fitness protocols that prioritize at-risk Americans and the elderly in disease prevention, education, and support.
This is something the existing federal government has been lax about and seems willing to interact with.
The penultimate detail of the plan is to repair the leadership of the White House National Security Council for Physical Security and Global Biodefensa, created by the Obama administration and dissolved two years ago through the Trump administration.
Beyond that, the plan calls on the country to restore relations with the World Health Organization (WHO) and PREDICT, the U. S. Agency for International Development’s pathogen monitoring programme, also eliminated through existing government.
Finally, they would increase the number of CDC “disease detectives” joining where fitness crises may begin. This means strengthening the organization in Beijing, also reduced through the existing administration.
“In fact, it’s really important,” Wilson said. “Trump has done a lot to destroy, not just before the pandemic but also the pandemic, the pandemic reaction infrastructure that exists to kick in at a time like this. “
Castel added that it is mandatory to re-establish our relationship with WHO so that we have a comprehensive pandemic preparedness initiative to move forward.
He said the lack of these frameworks had “upset our lives and our economy” and that “we will have to prepare for the next crisis. “
Medical experts say Biden’s plan provides “a starting point” to develop testing and tracking capabilities.
The last detail of the Biden-Harris plan is to go back to the masks.
One of the most complicated facets of America’s reaction to COVID-19 has been the way certain segments of political discourse have demonized protective masks.
The Biden-Harris crusade proposal says a new government would put into force a national mask mandate, along with local governors and mayors to make more Americans wear masks and make their component to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
“Experts say that if 95% of Americans wear masks until December, we can save about 70,000 lives,” the crusade’s website says.
The purpose of a mask authorization order is for all Americans to wear a mask when they are away from home. Governments would apply this in their states, with local government cooperating in this application.
Castel said it’s “awesome that other people are exposed to a court order,” but there has to be an application.
Especially after the politicization of the mask in the United States, a new management of Biden deserves to be followed through some kind of executing measure.
Castel said that whether it takes the form of a fine, for example, there has to be a way to make sure other people follow orders.
“It’s attractive for the crusade to say so, ” said Wilson.
He noted that at a recent televised hearing at the town hall, Biden himself said that the federal government cannot enforce this and that it is up to states to enforce their administration’s guidelines.
Wilson said a new look at education from the federal government, emphasizing how science indicates that masks are needed.
“Historically, in general, the regulation of physical fitness and public fitness issues has been left to communities, and that’s where the experience lies,” Wilson added.
He noted that an iowa agricultural network wanted another recommendation for COVID-19 in a Brooklyn network: the epidemic had affected any of the communities and the reaction wished to adapt accordingly.
That said, a federally unified message is needed on the mask.
“The concentrate will have to be in the collective. As air pollutants have nothing to do with individual states; pollutants are made, it goes into the air and travels to five states. We have a national defense, we have a national tax. “. system, and I would say that health care is also a component of the same kind of framework,” he said. That’s why we have federal proposals to solve federal problems. “
Wilson added that this is why it is frustrating to see a federal government completely abdicate its day-to-day jobs when it came here to a reaction to COVID-19.
Instead, the existing administration has used its power to politicize and make it difficult to understand something like the common sense importance of wearing a protective mask.
A recent study published in the American Journal of Public Health found that since the pandemic was unleashed, Americans must now play a more important role than before to improve people’s lives.
Researchers found that the proportion of U. S. adults seeking a more active government role was higher in more than 40% of the pandemic’s initial wave last spring.
It’s just a study, but it means Americans expect the federal government to play a bigger role in responding to crises like COVID-19, less.
Wilson said he became involved in what would take a position in January if there was a new administration in office and the plan was adopted.
He said “the cat got out of the bag” in the sense that THE COVID-19 subjected partisan lenses.
Instead of being noticed as a risk to public fitness that we all want to face collectively, it has leaked as a Democratic or Republican concern. He said none of this is a “miracle solution. “
“You want to rebuild the infrastructure, rebuild the FDA, repair accept as true at the CDC, reintegrate WHO, rebuild relationships around the world that are broken, perhaps hopelessly, with our partners who no longer accept as true to us. China, with whom we have had a lot of clinical discussion and corroboration,” he said.
He added that he believed that this set of proposals could be implemented and would be “very useful,” the polarized nature of the United States in its current state would make it more difficult.
“I learned a lot from this pandemic. I’ve been doing this for a long time: I’m a doctor, I’m not naive about human habit and people’s ability to do difficult things. But I’m surprised and stunned by a number of Americans who love a guy who brazenly puts in everything no matter what,” he added.
Castel said it is imperative that vulnerable communities do not be left behind.
If there is a new administration, those communities should focus and awareness-raising should be done immediately. He said the big challenge was all the “inconsistent messages” we’ve won since the start of the pandemic.
“You’ll hear from others like Dr. Fauci leading with science, and then you’ll see that our leadership and our president and management members don’t adhere to some of the guidelines or present false or misleading messages,” he says.
In the future, you need to see a coherent message from the federal government. He said he also hoped that the government would make it transparent to other Americans that it was a new virus. More data is obtained monthly, weekly, daily.
“We want to be adaptable and flexible to integrate all this incoming data into one response. There is a curve to be reporting, and I know it is difficult, however, there will have to be a message for other Americans in which we say: “If we learn more, we will put new measures into force. We can replace the recommendation we started with,” Castel added.
The ever-changing nature of COVID-19 and the continued replacement of our lives make it a challenge for any government.
For the Biden-Harris administration to adopt these recommendations, if they are in position in January, the challenge will be to respond to this ever-changing crisis while rebuilding what has been dismantled while charting the way forward as a pandemic. Continues.
Here’s how to do it yourself from COVID-19 if you plan to vote for the user on November 3.
From COVID-19 to the State of Affordable Care Act, presidential applicants will offer contrasting visions for the long-term fitness in the . . .
Last week, President Trump signed an executive order to help Americans with pre-existing conditions such as asthma or diabetes.
Here are undeniable strategies you can use at home to make your own fabric face mask with a clearing to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
Although evidence of the effect of physical (social) estating is still limited, early knowledge recommends that you have not reduced the number of infections.
Self-quarantine can be difficult, but dealing with it is impossible.
There’s a between being careful and being compulsive.
A pandemic is an epidemic that affects everyone. The World Health Organization has criteria for determining when an epidemic becomes a pandemic.
Your smartphone won’t be an endless source of anxiety.
Nearly a third of young people with Zika had developmental delays and other problems, according to a new study.