We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a greater experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Studies show that money movement systems that build the approval of incumbents through their money have an effect on a transparent agreement with the executive. But is this effect maintained when it is the legislator and not the incumbent who proposes the program?In the midst of the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic, more than 60 million Brazilians won an emergency aid payment that was proposed through Congress in opposition to executive resistance. This study is based on this exclusive case to read about whether money moves presidential approval systems in cases where accountability is not transparent. The Effects survey showed that while approval ratings rose, the public was divided as to who was to blame for the program. In addition, an experience survey that informed respondents about negotiations between the president and Congress found that the data improves prospects about Congress but not presidential. approval. The effects suggest that even money movement systems can herald limited vertical liability in contexts where political accountability is not transparent.
Online attachment
There is no knowledge of CrossRef available.