When our leader, in his wisdom, graciously eliminated the risk of a fourth choice

David Horovitz is the founding editor of the Times of Israel. It is that of “Still Life with Bombers” (2004) and “A Little Too Close to God” (2000), and co- of “Shalom Friend: The Life and Legacy of Yitzhak Rabin” (1996). In the past he edited the Jerusalem Post (2004-2011) and The Jerusalem Report (1998-2004).

All of this means that the tactic of early elections is not over; Hauser’s commitment to transitoryness still does not give Israel a genuine state budget for 2020-2021, with terrible consequences for the public and Israelis of the working class in particular, and therefore gives Netanyahu the opportunity for exactly the same maneuver in a few months.

Non-obsessive fans might be surprised by some of the above. This is not the case with the Israeli electorate. A ballot through the thirteenth channel, published on Sunday night exactly when Netanyahu was largely friendly with the electoral shadow over Israel, revealed that 59% would blame him if we were forced to vote again, compared to only 20% responsible to Gantz. More troubling to Netanyahu, the survey showed that 50% of respondents than the “main factor” that lately influences Netanyahu’s political decisions is “his legal future,” and only 18% think he basically weighs “the interests of the state. “

These were obviously not the conclusions that encouraged a new use of the ballot box. But the non-crisis is not over. Our leader, in his wisdom, decided that now was not the time.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *