The New York Times describes Sweden’s technique for COVID-19, which has been less restrictive than policies in other European countries and the United States, as “disastrous” and “calamitous. “By contrast, Scott Atlas, a physician and member of the Hoover Institution who advises President Donald Trump on the epidemic, believes Swedish politics is “relatively rational” and “has been misappropriated. “
The acute war of words on Sweden is part of the broader debate on the profitability of large-scale locks as a strategy to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. While it is inappropriate to draw conclusions from the company, evidence so far suggests that Sweden is doing better than the United States, where governors have tried to involve the virus by imposing radical social and economic restrictions.
Despite some early mistakes (the most obvious, the inability to adequately protect residents of nursing homes), Sweden has sometimes tried to protect those in danger of dying from COVID-19 while giving the rest of the population much more freedom than allowed through what does not mean that swedes have continued as usual , as the government has imposed safe restrictions (including banning giant public gatherings) and issued recommendations to reduce the transmission of blockades than all U. S. governors. the virus.
The consequences of this policy seem bad when comparing Sweden to Denmark, Finland and Norway, neighbouring countries that have noticed fewer deaths consistent with COVID-19 consistent with capita; however, Sweden has a lower mortality rate than several European countries that have imposed blockades. , together with Belgium, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom.
The comparison between Sweden and the United States is striking. The per capita death rate in the United States has recently exceeded Sweden’s rate, and the gap is widening as the number of cumulative deaths increases much more in the United States.
The average daily deaths over seven days peaked around the same time last spring in both countries, adjusted by population, the highest peak in Sweden.
Since then, however, this average has fallen more dramatically in Sweden, to 99% since 16 April, with 65% in the US. But it’s not the first time Since April 21. The average of seven days of recently shown instances has also declined dramatically in Sweden, through almost 80% since the end of June.
In the United States, during the same period, new daily instances first accumulated, an accumulation that began a month and a portion after states began lifting their locks. fallen through 46%.
Achieving collective immunity, which protects others from high-risk equipment by reducing the likelihood of assembly carriers, has never been an official objective of Swedish politics, but recent trends are consistent with speculation that Sweden has achieved some measure of collective immunity through a combination of exposure to the COVID-19 virus , T-cell reaction favored by prior exposure to other coronaviruses and increased resistance to herbs among the remaining uns infected population.
In the United States, meanwhile, lockouts, despite the high prices involved, have had no apparent benefit in terms of fewer COVID-19 deaths, possibly replaced the time of death. It would have been another if the locks had been imposed before or if they had been lifted later and with more caution.
But maybe not. In an article by the National Bureau of Economic Research published last month, UCLA economist Andrew Atkeson and two other researchers, after examining COVID-19 trends in 23 countries and 25 US states, were able to find a problem. But it’s not the first time Who had noticed more than 1,000 deaths from the disease last July, they discovered little evidence that politics adjusts the evolution of the epidemic elsewhere.
Atkeson and his co-authors conclude that the role of legal restrictions is “overestimated,” saying their findings “raise questions about the importance” of blockades in controlling the epidemic. It wouldn’t be the first time other people have exaggerated the government’s force for action ignoring everything else.
Jacob Sullum is editor-in-chief of Reason magazine. Follow him on Twitter: JacobSullum. To be more informed about Jacob Sullum and read articles by other creators and cartoonists of Creators Syndicate, creators Syndicate’s website on www. creators. com.
Trump shows what happens to the US police formula. And Democrats probably wouldn’t like the answer.
Why Biden is doing so badly with Hispanics can be summed up in this clip
LOOK: Biden and Harris had a day off