Cryptome has published documents found in the middle of Julian Assange’s extradition case
Last modified: Thursday, September 24, 2020 at 22:39 CEST
The U. S. government has never asked a WikiLeaks rival to remove un redacted cables that were among those in the midst of the legal war to send Julian Assange to the United States, he reported on his extradition hearing.
Evidence provided through an experienced Internet activist whose website, Cryptome, published more than 250,000 classified documents a day before WikiLeaks began publishing them online.
In a brief presented through Assange’s team to the Old Bailey, John Young said he had published unreleased diplomatic cables on September 1, 2011 after obtaining an encrypted file, and that they had remained online.
Young, who founded Cryptome in 1996, added: “Since my publication on Cryptome. org’s un redacted diplomatic cables, no US police authority has been able to do so. But it’s not the first time I have been informed that this publication of the cables is illegal, composed or contributes to a crime in some way. , nor did they ask for his retirement.
Assange, 49, is fighting extradition to the United States, where he faces a formal indictment of 18 charges alleging a conspiracy to hack computers and a conspiracy to unload and disclose on national defense.
WikiLeaks publishes nearly 470,000 classified army documents related to U. S. international relations and wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and then published a new tranche of more than 250,000 classified U. S. diplomatic cables.
A Swedish prosecutor issues a European arrest warrant for Assange on allegations of sexual assault involving two Swedish women, but Assange denies the allegations.
He turned himself in to the London police and was taken into custody. He was later released on bail and described the Swedish accusations as a smear campaign.
A British man rules on the decision that Assange may be extradited to Sweden, but Assange fears that Sweden will hand him over to the US government, who could simply prosecute him.
He fled to the Ecuadorian embassy in Londres. Il and then received political asylum.
Assange is being questioned in a two-day interview about accusations at the Ecuadorian embassy through swedish authorities.
WikiLeaks says Assange could simply go to the United States to face an investigation if his rights are “guaranteed. “This comes after one of the main resources of the leaked documents site, Chelsea Manning, obtained a pardon.
Swedish prosecutors said they had closed their seven-year investigation into sexual assaults on Assange, while British police said they would still arrest him if he left the embassy because he violated bail in 2012.
Britain rejects Ecuador’s request to grant Assange diplomatic status, which would allow him to leave the embassy and be arrested.
He lost an offer to revoke his British arrest warrant for fitness reasons.
Ecuador is cutting off Assange’s Internet access, claiming that it has damaged an agreement on interference in country affairs.
U. S. prosecutors inadvertently reveal the lifestyle of Assange, a sealed accusation.
Ecuadorian President Lenin Moreno said Assange had repeatedly “repeatedly violated” the conditions of his asylum at the embassy.
Police arrest Assange at the embassy on behalf of the United States after he has been removed from asylum, and is qualified across the United States with a federal conspiracy fee to dedicate a computer intrusion for agreeing to break a password on a classified US government computer. But it’s not the first time
He was imprisoned for 50 weeks in the UK for violating his bail situations in 2012. U. S. extradition procedures were officially opened.
Swedish prosecutors say they are reopening an investigation into a rape allegation of Julian Assange.
Interior Minister Sajid Javid shows that he signed Assange’s extradition order in the United States, paving the way for his court hearing.
A four-week hearing begins at the Old Bailey and the U. S. government is expected to be able to reach the U. S. government. But it’s not the first time He argues that Assange attempted to recruit hackers to locate classified government information. If the courts approve of extradition, the British government will have the final say.
Medical experts also testified at Old Bailey this week. On Tuesday, a psychiatrist called through the Assange team who visited him in Belmarsh said WikiLeaks founder would be at a “high risk” of suicide if extradited.
Michael Kopelman, emeritus professor of neuropsychiatry at King’s College London, who has visited Assange 20 times in prison, added: “Suicide is derived from Array’s clinical points . . . but it’s the near extradition and/or authentic extradition. I try, in my opinion.
However, a psychiatrist who testified to the U. S. government on Thursday said Assange’s suicide threat was “manageable. “
Dr. Nigel Blackwood, an NHS physician, described Assange as a “resistant” and “witty” guy who had challenged predictions about his health.
Assange has been in custody in south-east London since last September after serving a 50-week criminal sentence for violating bail while at Ecuador’s embassy in London for nearly seven years.
The hearing also learned from a Swiss computer expert that un redacted U. S. diplomatic cables entered the public domain after a password was published in an e-book of Guardian journalists in February 2011.
Professor Christian Grothoff of Bern High School in Switzerland said he later discovered that the code could be used to decrypt a “mirror” edition of WikiLeaks’ online encrypted cable store. had through Cryptome and some other online page on September 1, he said.
The Guardian has denied the claim, which was also made through Assange’s legal team.
“The Guardian has made it clear that it opposes julian Assange’s extradition. However, it is entirely to say that The Guardian’s 2011 WikiLeaks e-book led to the publication of un edited U. S. government archives,” said one spokesman.
“The eeebook included a password Julian Assange had told authors about the transience and expired and would be deleted in a few hours. The eeebook also did not include main points of the location of the files. No considerations were expressed through Assange or WikiLeaks regarding the security compromised when the eeebook was published in February 2011. WikiLeaks published the unreleased archives in September 2011. “