A leading-edge research firm focused on digital transformation.
President Donald Trump refused to acknowledge the seriousness of the high US death rate per capita from COVID-19 in a tumultuous interview where he instead argued for more flattering statistics.
The president sparred with political reporter Jonathan Swan for “Axios on HBO” in an interview which aired on Monday.
During the interview, Swan tried to pressure him on this metric as instances in the United States increased.
According to Our World In Data statistics, as of August 3, the United States is lately the sixth worst country for million-consistent coronavirus deaths.
The metric reflects how many people are dying with COVID-19 as a proportion of the whole population.
According to a 7-day moving average, the countries with the worst record for this metric are Colombia, Brazil, Mexico, South Africa and Chile.
As a cumulative total of capital-consistent deaths for the global epidemic to date, the United States ranks eighth among the worst countries in the world, after Belgium, the United Kingdom, Peru, Spain, Italy, Sweden and Chile, according to Statista statistics.
Both sites have the difficulty of gaining reliable knowledge about deaths.
But when asked about this way of measuring the effect of the pandemic, Trump was derogatory.
“You can’t do that, ” he said.
“Why can’t I do that?” Swan asked.
Rummaging through a series of published graphics, Trump said, “Look. This is America. You have to go through the cases,” he said, and told Swan that he looked at “the other people who live off those cases.”
In essence, Trump sought to talk about the rate of jurisprudence, the proportion of other people who contract coronavirus who eventually die because of it.
Death in the United States has taken a step forward since the pandemic peaked in April and May.
At 3.3%, this is higher than the global average, according to Our World In Data. He is at the helm of some countries whose reaction to the pandemic has been praised, such as Germany and Spain.
The problem with the fatality rate metric is that it can vary based on the testing regime of the country in question. The more mild cases a country finds, the better its fatality rate will appear.
Countries with little testing will have a consistent upward rate, as only serious and fatal infections will be reported. Consistency with the capita metric – in population length – is less affected by these factors.
In the interview, Swan and Trump had a passionate circular exchange about the parameters Trump was with, with Swan visibly frustrated.
Swan said: “It is an applicable statistic to say whether the United States has an X population and a consistent mortality rate consistent with the population of that population…”
“No, because you have to pass the cases,” Trump replied.
“Look at South Korea, for example. 51 million people, three hundred dead,” Swan said.
“You don’t know, ” said Trump. When asked if he accused the country of manipulating his statistics, he said, “I’m not going to get into this because I have a very smart date with the country, but you don’t know, and they have spikes.”
Instead, Trump pointed to another chart. “Look, here’s one. United States. Take the number of instances and look, we’re the last. That means we’re the first. We have the best.” It is not known what metric the president refers to.
He then re-entered an earlier statement that the highest number of coronavirus cases in the United States is due to his widespread testing, an indicator of how he controlled the pandemic.
The United States has done more tests than others in the world, according to Johns Hopkins University.
“Don’t we have credits for that? He said, “And we do more tests, we have more cases.”
It’s a privileged topic of discussion. Trump said in June that the tests were “overestimated” because they gave America a “bad image,” and later in the month, the United States did “too smart a job” at trials.
However, scientists have discredited the concept that large accounts represent the largest number of cases in the United States.
Jennifer B. Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins’ Bloomberg School of Public Health, says Trump’s theory is “dangerously false” in a Washington Post article in June.
It noted that in many states, the new ones exceeded the dissemination of the evidence, suggesting that the effects were still underneath.
Later, Swan tried to get the president to focus on the proportionally high mortality rate, saying that “1,000 Americans die every day.”
There have been an average of more than 1,000 deaths consistent with the day since July 29, according to Worldometer statistics.
“No, but I’m not reporting it properly, Jonathan, ” said the president.
Swan disagreed: “If hospital rates were going down and deaths were going down I’d say ‘terrific. You deserve to be praised for testing. But they’re all going up. 60,000 Americans are in hospital. 1,000 dying a day.”
Get the latest research on the economic and advertising aspects that affect Business Insider Intelligence coronaviruses on how COVID-19 affects industries.