The U. S. Department of Energy is reportedly in the U. S. Department of Energy. The U. S. Department of Health concluded with “little confidence” that the coronavirus had leaked from a lab, reigniting a debate over the origins of the pandemic, with some federal agencies believing the virus spread naturally from animals to humans, while others have supported the theory. – which many experts say is feasible but unlikely – that it spread from a laboratory accident.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases: The firm said evidence suggests the virus originated in nature and spread from an unidentified host animal to humans, bringing bats as an imaginable source of origin: Dr. Anthony Fauci, a longtime former head of the firm, Ha said in the afterlife that he is open to the option of a lab leak, however, he believes an herbal origin of the virus is more likely.
Centers for Disease Control: The firm also links the origin of the virus to bats, according to its website, but at a congressional hearing in 2021, CDC Director Dr. Anna S. S. S. S. Simpsoned with the virus. Rochelle Walensky called a lab leak “a possibility. “
Intelligence Community: U. S. Intelligence Agenciesare divided over whether the virus spread naturally or accidentally from a lab, and either theory is plausible, the National Intelligence Council said in an October 2021 report, but ruled out the option that the virus evolved as a biological weapon and assessed that the virus was not genetically modified.
Department of Energy: The company now believes the coronavirus has most likely leaked from a lab, but that’s a “low-confidence” assessment, the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times reported Sunday. He was undecided in the past, the Journal reported. )
Federal Bureau of Investigation: The law enforcement firm “for some time” concluded that the virus originated at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a Chinese lab working on coronavirus, Christopher Wray told the FBI board to Fox News in February.
Central Intelligence Agency: The country’s main foreign intelligence firm does not have between the two dominant theories, laboratory leakage and animal-to-human transmission, the Journal reported Sunday, one of two agencies that are again undecided.
Other intelligence agencies: Four unknown agencies and the National Intelligence Council with “low confidence” that humans naturally attached the virus to animals rather than a lab incident, unchanged from the 2021 NIC report.
Senate Republicans: Most likely, the pandemic is the result of an “investigation-related incident” and speculation of animal transmission “no longer deserves the advantages of the doubt,” said Republican members of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. An October 2022 report.
Chinese authorities on Monday rejected findings reported by the Energy Ministry, introducing a World Health Organization resolution saying it is “extremely unlikely” the coronavirus came from a lab and arguing that efforts to advance the theory are political. The Chinese government has consistently rejected the theory that the virus originated in a laboratory.
The WHO released a report two years ago confirming that there was widespread contamination with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes covid-19, at the Huanan food market in Wuhan, China, after conducting studies there in early 2021. The report also said a lab leak was the least likely speculation about the spread of the virus. Some, and they added to the Biden administration, said they were involved in the investigation and argued that the Chinese government had not given the WHO enough data to fully investigate the origins. of the virus. In July 2021, the Chinese government rejected a WHO plan to conduct a momentary phase of studies, which would have deepened the theory of laboratory leaks.
The theory that the virus leaked from a laboratory in China instead of jumping naturally from animals to humans has been around since the start of the pandemic and has been supported by Republicans. Some believers in lab leaks believe the virus could have possibly evolved naturally and escaped from a lab doing studies on it, but others, including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky. ), have warned it could also be a virus. created during the National Institutes of Health-assisted bat coronavirus studies at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, a claim that former NIH director Francis Collins was quick to call “patently false. ” But many scientists dispute the claims of lab leak advocates. A report published last year in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences argued that there is “considerable peer-reviewed clinical evidence” that the virus that causes covid-19 jumped from bats to humans. other wild animals to wildlife traders, causing an epidemic in the Huanan market. Another 2020 review that looked at the origins of the virus found no evidence to support the lab’s origin theory and said the documented history of coronavirus spread was comparable to previous outbreaks. of coronaviruses related to the animal market.
757 million. This is the number of other people infected with COVID-19 since the first documented case of the virus in December 2019, according to WHO. Nearly seven million more people have died from the virus, the WHO said.
China reacts to lab leak report: says US ‘politicizes’ origins of Covid (Forbes)
Chronology: How the origin story of the Covid lab leak went from ‘conspiracy theory’ to debate (Forbes)
Here’s What Dr. Fauci Had to Say About the Origins of Covid and the Lab Leak (Forbes)
A timeline of the Wuhan COVID-19 lab origin theory (Forbes)
Covid most likely comes from lab leak, Energy Department says, but Biden says no ‘definitive answer’ (Forbes)
Full coronavirus policy and updates