The study of an anti-inflammatory drug looks promising in the treatment of patients with COVID-19

Researchers from 68 sites across the country, led by David E. Leaf and Shruti Gupta of the Harvard-affiliated Division of Kidney Medicine at Brigham and Women’s Hospital studied the effects of anti-inflammatory tocilizumab on critically ill laboratory patients, COVID-19 confirmed. Unlike steroids, which more widely inhibit the immune system, tocilizumab in particular inhibits the IL-6 pro-inflammatory cytokine receptor, researchers found that when tocilizumab was administered within the first two days of admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), there was a relative minimum mortality of 30% (and an absolute minimum of 10%) compared to patients whose remedy did not come with early use of tocilizumab. The effects are published in JAMA Internal Medicine.

”Tocilizumab has been used for several years to treat a condition known as cytokine release syndrome, which can be seen in cancer patients receiving certain types of immunotherapy,’ said Leaf, lead author of the study. It has been observed that much of the morbidity and mortality that occurs is possibly due to our own body’s inflammatory reaction to the virus as opposed to the virus itself. “

The monoclonal antibody tocilizumab was recently approved to treat rheumatoid arthritis and giant mobile arteritis, an inflammatory condition that affects giant blood vessels. It is also given to cancer patients who have obtained a cure for chimeric antigen receptor (CAR-T), a remedy that can stimulate the body’s immune formula to attack cancerous mobiles, but which can also cause poisonous side effects. because of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), an overwhelming inflammatory reaction that can cause multiorgan insufficiency. Tocilizumab is used to treat CKD in cancer patients and is recently being investigated for use in patients with COVID-19. Since the beginning of the pandemic, several studies have been conducted on tocilizumab in Europe and China, but none have been so giant or so deep.

The multicenter study used the knowledge of more than 4000 critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to the ICU at 68 sites in the United States as a component of the study of remedies and outcomes in critically ill patients with COVID-19 (STOP-COVID). COVID was introduced through Leaf and Gupta in March 2020 as an unfunded core network, and now includes more than 400 workers in the United States. These collaborators verified the detailed knowledge of adults in critical condition with COVID-19 by manually examining electronic medical records and entering more than 800 unique elements of patient knowledge into a central electronic knowledge base. For the existing study, Leaf and his team used a “target verification emulation” technique to read whether tocilizumab reduces COVID-19 mortality. Target verification emulation, a new observational knowledge analysis technique, simulates a randomized controlled assay to decrease bias.

“Discussions about the biases of observational studies tend to focus on the lack of randomization, however, many unusual biases of observational analyses have nothing to do with lack of randomization,” said co-author Miguel Hernán, pioneer of this strategy. and professor of biostatistics and epidemiology, at Harvard’s TH Chan School of Public Health. “Emulating the observational knowledge of an objective trial allows us to eliminate these unusual biases and concentrate the discussion very well on possible confusion factors due to lack of randomization. “

Of the 3,924 patients included in the analysis, 433 gained tocilizumab in the first two days of ICU admission. The death threat at 30 days was 27. 5 and 37. 1% in patients treated with tocilizumab and not treated with tocilizumab, respectively (absolute threat difference, 9. 6%). The favorable effect of tocilizumab on survival was consistent in all categories of age, sex and severity of the disease, and was also observed in patients who gained corticosteroids or not; in particular, patients whose trajectory of the disease was faster, explained as 3 days. or less between onset of symptoms and admission to intensive care benefited more from tocilizumab than patients with slower disease trajectories.

“I think the most vital thing we can do with the giant granular knowledge base we’ve combined at STOP-COVID is to compare which interventions are useful for reducing mortality,” Leaf said. “Clearly, randomized clinical trials are the popular gold for determining the effectiveness of remedies, but when knowledge of well-designed giant trials is not available, observational studies such as STOP-COVID can be used to consult clinical practice and long-term trial design. “

Despite the observational design, this test provides a very important and physically powerful understanding of the efficacy and protection of tocilizumab in a giant population of critically ill patients with COVID-19. On average, there was a relative relief of 30% in mortality in patients treated with tocilizumab in the first two days of ICU admission, there was no evidence of an increased threat of secondary infection, and there was only a small greater threat that the liver would serve as evidence. Anomalies.

“While there is conflicting evidence from clinical trials related to the efficacy of tocilizumab in COVID-19, our study differs from these trials in several vital forms: we focus in particular on critically ill patients; we focus on early use of tocilizumab (defined as the first 2 days of admission to intensive care); and we included a much larger number of patients (about 4000 compared to about 400) ,” said Gupta, the lead author. “We hope that our effects will stimulate further research of tocilizumab in COVID-19, especially as we see a build-up in cases across the country. “

In their analyses, the research team monitored a complete list of covariates, such as age, gender, race, ethnicity, comorities, acute severity of the disease and concurrent remedies received, excluding patients who would not have been eligible to participate in a study. A hypothetical randomized clinical trial on tocilizumab, as patients with upper liver, served as a test. They also used strategies to eliminate the threat of immortal temporal bias, which can occur when there is a delay between time 0 (p. ICU admission) and initiation of treatment (e. g. receiving tocilizumab on ICU Day 2). The main limitation of the examination is possible confusion due to observational design.

“I hope those effects will help in the design of difficult long-term clinical trials comparing early use of tocilizumab in critically ill patients with COVID-19,” Leaf said. “However, given the burden and complexity of achieving large-scale clinical trials in COVID-19, the existing study may be the most productive that evidence of tocilizumab has been had in this context for some time.

No investment was provided for this study. The authors of the editorial board are supported by the following grants from the National Institutes of Health: F32HL149337 (A. J. A. ); K23DK120811 (A. S. ); R01HL085757 (C. R. P) ;; R01HL144566 and R01DK125786 (D. E. L. ); K12hl138039 (J. D. ); K23hl130648 (K. S. M. ); R37AI102634 (MAH); F32DC017342 (S. G. ); K08GM134220 and R03AG060179 (S. S. ); K23hl143053 (M. W. S. ).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *