Un endlessly in view of the coronavirus epidemic in the United States, which has now surpassed five million infections and 162,000 virus deaths, accounting for about a quarter of the world’s deaths, many Americans wonder if something can be contrary to the trend.
The list of mistakes that critics say the U.S. government has made is well documented, adding a slow and disparate state effort of a national plan; combined messages and politicization of key protective measures such as masks; Lack of checks and non-public cover devices for frontline workers; and the withdrawal of investments from the U.S. public fitness infrastructure for decades.
Many states and local governments have also doubted their reaction to coronavirus, delaying restrictions, pushing for reopening despite the fact that the instances are not cutting and are reluctant to require masks.
Today, six months after the first COVID-19 infection was reported in the United States, the country is grappling with an increase in the number of instances, hospitalizations and deaths that only began to stabilize this week. However, July recorded almost as many cases as the first six months of the year combined.
President Trump and the White House have lobbied for the reopening of the country following the spring uptick in the virus, saying the economic damage of the closure, adding that leaving millions of unemployed, overcame other considerations. They also attributed in large part the increase in the number of cases to an increase in evidence, which they promoted with early measures such as China’s restriction.
They also stated that states were receiving the materials they needed, adding enthusiasts and non-public protective apparatus (PPE), the governors disputed this claim.
Dr. Robert Redfield, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), who also criticized his slowness in accelerating testing in the early days of the outbreak, admitted that “there were errors” in a past interview with ABC News. .
“Yes, we failed. We’re doing ourArray,” he said. “We check to make the trials possible.”
Redfield also gave undeniable exit orders. “This virus can be defeated if other people simply wear a mask,” he said.
Federal fitness officials and state and local leaders have sent combined messages about problems such as masking and who can and deserves examination. The CDC, for example, has been recommending a mask since the spring, but first warned that the general public did not want to.
President Trump, who hesitated to wear a mask in public even when his public fitness officials insisted he was saving lives, began to dress once in a while. However, management has not issued a national protection order.
White House deputy press secretary Judd Deere defended the administration’s reaction on an ABC News.
“The White House Coronavirus Working Group provides personalized recommendations each week to the governor and fitness commissioner in their states and counties,” Deere said. “Local leaders are in the most productive position to make decisions on the ground for their communities, armed with CDC rules and the most productive practices.”
“America will no longer be closed,” he added. “As the president said, the cure is worse than the disease.”
Despite the daunting figures, experts from Johns Hopkins, RAND and New York University contacted through ABC News did not see the backing stage. There’s a way out, they said. But a COVID-19 evacuation hatch will require a degree of coordination and leadership that they say is lacking among our country’s decision makers.
Here’s how 4 experts say they’d leave the COVID-19 nightmare blank in the United States, if they were accused:
How would U.S. COVID respond?
Dr. Amesh Adalja, Principal Investigator, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Safety: From the beginning, there has been a large-scale escape from the highest degrees of government. America’s first measures. They addressed China only in terms of others that can be reviewed and included an unnecessary ban. The failure of controllity, which we still suffer today, has absolutely destroyed the reaction to the epidemic. At first, it was highly unlikely that college and personal labs would manufacture verification kits because we had to rely on a faulty KIT from the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]. Throughout the pandemic, there has been a general attack on experience promoting untested drugs at the expense of evidence-based medicine.
Dr. Jennifer Bouey, epidemiologist, senior policy researcher at RAND: How America, as the world’s richest country and world leader in fitness for many decades, has failed so miserably, it has been unexpected for many public fitness professionals. Six months after the first case of COVID, the virus continues to circulate freely in the United States, causing 50,000 cases and more than 1,000 deaths each day. It’s mind-blowing. At least we have a reporting formula and a policy of transparency that can give a more or less accurate picture of the epidemic. Improved remedies and vaccine progression are underway, but I’m reluctant to call them “America.” Answer. It’s more of a credit to scientists and doctors.
Cheryl Healton, dean of New York University’s School of Global Public Health: We missed most of the vaccine development.
Dr. Tom Inglesby, director of the Health Safety Center at Johns Hopkins University’s Bloomberg School of Public Health: Obviously, america is doing much worse than many countries around the world. Not only are countries with degrees of economic development, but we are also harming more than many smaller, less resource-rich countries.
What key policy adjustments would you make to oppose the epidemic in the United States?
Adalja: The ultimate vital replacement would be to allow the CDC to do its homework and act unhindered. I’d recommend that the White House withdraw from that. From the beginning, the CDC has had to express its loyalty to the president’s whims and unreality than to the real facts on the ground.
Inglesby: The progress we made at the start of the pandemic was lost in the months that followed. We want universal adherence to basic principles such as masking, physical distance and hand hygiene, not giant meetings. We also want clear, consistent and unified public aptitude messages from national governments and states. I stopped high-risk activities in disease outbreak spaces, and if hospitals were in crisis, I would put house care orders into effect for two weeks. It would expand the production and distribution of PPE [individual protective equipment] and boost testing to reduce one-day response time.
Bouey: Premature openness and inconsistent politics have erased advances in control and tracking capability since the first widespread shutdowns. Now the virus is a forest chimney that spreads freely throughout the country. It would propose a closure of 90% of the total country for 3 weeks. No trips, no work, no school, no outings unless it’s for emergencies and fitness care. We wait until the end of the viral cycle, then gradually reopen with a thorough review and tracking. We quarantine other positives and set up a delicate tracking formula to identify access points. This would allow semi-opening in two or three months (even without collection or giant bars) and a general life with surveillance in six months.
Healton: We close states with a two-week case buildup to give a break to the health care formula and lower the state’s benchmark rate to make touch studies more sustainable. We strictly comply with CDC’s reopening and withdrawal rules with an amendment: a national law on mandatory masks.
How long would you take?
Adalja: Preparation for a pandemic has been prioritized in the same way as national security. This may not be something that is going through a cycle of forgetfulness and panic, yet anything that is sustainably funded and sustained even when infectious disease emergencies disappear from the headlines.
Bouey: I would write in law on public financing of fitness, reaction to a pandemic and monitoring public knowledge of physical fitness as a pandemic. We want to improve infrastructure by creating a coherent national platform for medical records; Link travel records with knowledge of physical fitness Train public physical fitness personnel Expedite public-private pandemic preparation partnerships; and the transfer of critical production capacity to the United States. We want to transfer pandemic leadership to experienced professionals.
Healton: The U.S. spends less than 1% of every fitness dollar on public fitness. We want to invest more, bring back the White House’s global pandemic team. We want to revitalize CDC and politicization. We want to address the public suitability delegation factor at the local point and establish particular federal obligations and authority in the event of a pandemic.
Is that your realistic plan? What are the obstacles?
Adalja: The biggest impediment to my plan is the fact that politicians are short-term thinkers, who think only of the upcoming elections and the long-term consequences of their actions.
Inglesby: All of this is feasible if national and state leaders complete it.
Bouey: Incompetent leadership, pandemic politicization and complacency are the biggest obstacles. We want leadership that can convey consistent, effective and clinical messages to the American public. This leader will need to provide the facts of the epidemic, expand a plan, and urge Americans to combine paints to fight the virus, rather than fight each other. We want to avoid congratulating ourselves or blaming others and facing the fact that there are many paintings to be made to fix public fitness and fitness formula in this country.
Healton: The Resistance of the White House and the lack of public understanding.
If your COVID-19 plan were to be implemented immediately, where do you think the U.S. would be. In six months?
Adalja: We would think about strategic preparation for a pandemic and the implementation of the systems necessary to strengthen our resilience. It would remove the CDC’s restrictions. This would be one of the main short-term advantages of our communication and public fitness detection strategies at the national level.
Inglesby: Many other countries have shown that it is imaginable to reduce the disease to a very low level. It’s imaginable.
Bouey: In my opinion, the only plan that can guarantee the containment of the virus for six months will be a full national closure of 3 to 4 weeks, more restrictive than last time, followed by testing, research, patient isolation and travel. Quarantine. In the short term, it’s painful, but otherwise there’s not even the option of half-opening for schools, businesses and meetings.
Healton: The United States can particularly reduce the rate of infection, but only with some other closure in developing states. This makes economic and public sense. Not to mention emergency production capacity, we will not meet CDC verification criteria and cannot meet touch search guidelines.
Is there anything else you need Americans to know?
Healton: It’s a national tragedy of epic proportions and, unfortunately, also a national nuisance. COVID-19 is an equivalent opportunity killer. Our racism stands out.
Tune ABC to 1 p.m. ET and ABC News Live at four p.m. ET each and every day of the week for the special policy of the new coronavirus with the entire ABC News team, adding the latest news, context and analysis.
24/7 policy of the latest news and events