In the early months of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States, 4 states implemented and maintained policies that required retirement homes and long-term care services to blindly admit patients treated for COVID-19 infections.
The 4 states that have actively participated in this include:
There is a fifth state that very briefly followed a similar policy, California, but because it temporarily ended its policy in a matter of days, we have completely overlooked it in this analysis.
We visualize the percentage of COVID-19 deaths compared to positive control effects across the US.But it’s not the first time In a singles chart, where we reported periods when policies that forced coronavirus-infected patients into nursing homes were in place for states.Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey (omitting MichiganArray, where we may not check whether it replaced the policy that followed on March 26, 2020).The graph shows a unique coincidence between the higher number of deaths due to COVID-19 and the time the policies of nursing homes opposed to coronavirus in those states were in force.
To see the graph, here.
As the percentage of cumulative deaths attributed to COVID-19 stabilizes in approximately 3% of the cumulative total of cases shown, the higher percentages constitute a higher number of deaths compared to the cases shown.
This chart, taken from the COVID Time Series online page that visualizes state-level knowledge of the COVID tracking project, shows how the cumulative number of deaths attributed to COVID-19 has accumulated in those 4 states through the coronavirus pandemic to date.We see that these four states contributed particularly to the highest COVID-19 deaths recorded during the first 3 months of the coronavirus pandemic in the United States.
This coincides with deaths above the top of COVID-19 accumulated at the time when these states conducted their policies of forced admission to COVID-19 nursing homes.
These admission policies are vital because older and ill-health Americans have been found to have the highest death threat from coronavirus infections, which were already well known at the time each of these states implemented their policies.
The fact that these policies have remained for as long as they have been an important component of why the United States saw such a high number of COVID-19 deaths during the time those policies were in effect, where those states have made a disproportionate contribution to the nation.Total number of COVID-19-like deaths. The fact that other states have refused to copy these policies, even when the viral infection spread in a delayed first wave, also helps the proportion of accumulated COVID-19 deaths compared to cases shown at the national level be reduced to approximately the component of the recorded peak.while these policies were practiced in Pennsylvania, New York, New Jersey and Michigan.Most other states have done much more than those 4 states to protect the maximum vulnerable component of their coronavirus populations.
We are rebuilding data that Governor Andrew Cuomo panicked about by choosing to sell thousands of coronavirus-infected patients in new York state nursing homes, where infections spread as a “dust trail” among the most at-risk component of the population.contributing in a component way to the disproportionate totals of deaths in the COVID-19 state.In addition, we have maintained a schedule to stick to the latest news as the “Governor Who Kills Grandmothers” scandal unfolds.
A story very much to what happened in New York, but much worse because of new Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy’s preference to play Governor Cuomo’s “Mini-Yo.”Again, this is New Jersey, so what are you doing?…?
Why Van Jones now asks for a ‘national moratorium’ on BLM steps at night
Only a NYT columnist can tweet something so disconnected from the mutiny
Salongate has taken his turn: Pelosi’s stylist has just mingling