Intuition is incorrect when it comes to calculating the true charge of the fundamental source of income: the UK can do it without problems.
Receive our weekly email
Universal Basic Income (RBU), a policy that would provide a normal source of monetary income to each and every citizen without a resource requirement or paint requirement, is strangely economical. The UK can introduce a complete RBU (large enough to live) for only 67 billion pounds per year or 3.4% of gross domestic product (GDP), according to a study that Georg Arendt and I recently completed.
Attention to the RBU in the UK has increased significantly as the Scottish parliament talks about its delight and lawmakers talk about it as a transitional measure to stimulate the economy of the Covid-19 epidemic. While a pilot assignment would likely read about some of the effects of the RBU, this type of study is necessary to determine how much it will likely cost.
The charge of RBU is exaggerated because many authors concentrate on their “gross charge”: the length of the RBU multiplied across the population. The gross charge of the RBU is not a significant charge, as it is not known to what extent the new taxes that other people pay to help the RBU are offset by the new budget they get in the RBU. The actual charge for OBI is the “net charge”: the amount other people get or pay after subtracting the amount they pay themselves. The net charge of a full RBU in the UK is only about one-third of its gross position.
Our review is based on knowledge of the UK Family Resources Survey 2014/15. It uses EUROMOD-style micro-equity research of European tax benefits to subtract the amount other people pay themselves and charge an RBU at approximately the 7,706 euro poverty point consisting of adult and 3,853 euros consistent with children.
The main findings of the include:
Those who remain in poverty under this program would be much closer to the poverty line than they are now and would have enough in combination with other government bills and services. We therefore conclude that an RBU of this length would eliminate absolute poverty in the United Kingdom, a difficult result for less cash than Parliament has recently spent on trade subsidies and tax exemptions.
Download the full report
This article is published with an international Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial 4.0 license. If you have any questions about the reissue, please contact us. Refer to the individual photos for license details.