To review this article, My Profile, then View Recorded Stories.
By Colleen Stinchcombe
Airport coronavirus screening has not been as effective at detecting COVID-19 cases as experts expected, according to a November 13 report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). , was to locate people who carried the virus based on its origin and the symptoms of COVID-19 that they had. Detecting these cases before other people with COVID-19 to other communities could theoretically decrease the spread of the virus. Only one case was detected per 85,000 lers evaluated, according to the CDC. Moreover, these projections are expensive and also require a lot of time and human effort, the report says.
The detection strategy began on January 17 at Los Angeles International Airport, San Francisco International Airport and John F International Airport. Kennedy from New York, the report says. Initially, it was limited to passengers in Wuhan, China, where the first cases of coronavirus were reported in the following months, as more and more countries began to pass through sustained transmission of the COVID-19 network, detection was prolonged to travelers across the continent. China, Iran, much of Europe, the United Kingdom, Ireland and Brazil. At its peak, the screening took place at 15 U. S. airports.
This is how the inspection worked: first, airport officials referred passengers for evaluation if they had visited any of the indexed countries in the last two weeks; Inspection officials then observed travellers’ symptoms, took their temperatures with infrared thermometers, and asked if there were evolved symptoms such as fever, shortness of breath and coughing in more than 24 hours, or whether they had been exposed to a coronavirus user for more than two weeks. Officials also collected passenger details.
If a passenger had symptoms or was exposed to a user with COVID-19, then he or she would move on to the doctors on site for further examination, but even then, not all travelers have been monitored. The report indicated that at certain points in the pandemic, screening officials may have underestimated the number of travellers who might have had the virus, which may also have influenced symptomatic travellers for control and the number of symptomatic travellers.
Between January 17 and September 13, the CDC reported that they tracked down 766044 travelers in search of coronavirus. Two hundred and ninety-8 met the criteria for a deeper public assessment of physical condition and 35 gained control of COVID-19 as a result. Only nine – 0. 001% – had a positive control result. Officials detected six other instances of COVID-19 outside the gates of this inspection protocol, due to the procedures of air and airport partners, and eight other instances through notifications from the United States or other countries indicating that the passenger tested positive prior to the trip.
In the end, the CDC concluded that the screening strategy is useless because the virus can spread before a user begins to develop symptoms, some have no symptoms, and symptoms that appear to be uns specific. Coronavirus manifests itself in many tactics that experts are still exploring, and some of the common highs, such as dry cough and fever, would possibly also be related to other diseases. There are other points that may have influenced this low screening rate, such as a low overall prevalence of COVID-19 among travelers at certain times in the pandemic, or travelers who mask their symptoms with fever medications or cough suppressants.
Since the end of the screenings on September 14, US airports have been in the middle of the world. But it’s not the first time They have been looking to prevent the spread of COVID-19, mainly by selling coronavirus rescue methods, the ability to return obviously sick passengers for additional detection and implementing a more detailed audience. fitness reaction for incoming travelers. The report recommends the creation of an effective way to collect tactile passenger data to facilitate touch search, requiring pre-departure and post-arrival testing, and enforcing “limited movement” after a high-risk journey.
As coronavirus cases jump across the country, it is vital that we are far from out of danger with this pandemic. Today, the experts’ greatest fear is social gatherings. A tragic example includes a marriage in Maine that has led to 178 cases of coronavirus and seven deaths to date. Those who died and three others who were hospitalized didn’t even attend the rally. And now that temperatures are drop in many parts of the country, experts are even more involved than the drive to organize social activities. Meetings inside can lead coronavirus cases, hospitalizations, and deaths to unprecedented numbers.
It is up to all of us to do everything in our power to prevent the spread of this virus. For many of us, this means taking the potentially heartbreaking resolve not to go to the holiday season or to reunite with our families. Even Anthony Fauci, MD, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, skips Thanksgiving with his daughters this year, but if you’re making plans to do so, follow those tips to make sure you do it as safely as possible. , if you’re gathering someone outdoors at home for this year’s vacation, which automatically increases the threat of exposure to everyone’s virus, read those recommendations to lessen that threat as much as you can.
Related:
Dr. Fauci is ”concerned’ about Trump’s blockade of Biden’s transition at COVID-19
The concept of collective immunity coronavirus is fatal and dangerous
At what point is it difficult to make a roadArray an exercise or a flight right now?
SELF does not provide medical advice, diagnosis or treatment. The information posted on this page online or through this logo is not intended to update medical advice, and you should not take any action before consulting a healthcare professional.
Discover new exercise ideas, healthy food recipes, makeup styles, skin care tips, good looking products and tips, trends and more from SELF.
More me
Contact
© 2020 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site is an acceptance of our user agreement (updated 1/1/20) and privacy and cookie policy (updated 1/1/20) and your privacy rights in California. HE MAY EARN A portion of the sales of products purchased on our site as a component of our partner component associations with retailers. The content of this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, unless you have the prior written permission of Condé Nast.