A new review to show that the new chinese lab-made coronavirus was published through a couple of nonprofit teams connected with Steve Bannon, Trump’s former strata leader who now faces felony fraud charges.
The study, co-written by a Chinese virologist who fled Hong Kong this year, states that “laboratory manipulation is a component of the SARS-CoV-2 story. ” Their findings were temporarily picked up by a handful of leading news organizations like the New York Post, which highlighted “explosive” claims that run counter to all existing clinical literature on the source of the virus.
The exam is the paintings of the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, sister nonprofit organizations Bannon helped create. According to documents posted on the company’s online page last year, he chaired the group. through Kevin Bird, a PhD candidate at Michigan State University and shared through Carl Bergstrom, a professor of biology at the University of Washington, who called the exam “strange and unfounded. “
Research on google scholar websites and the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation indicates that organizations have never published clinical or medical studies before and it is not known whether the article has been peer reviewed. Zenodo’s website, a public directory of clinical and educational studies where everyone can download their work.
The two nonprofits under review were formed in collaboration with exiled Chinese billionaire Guo Wengui, with whom Bannon collaborated on a series of advocacy efforts aimed at the Chinese government and corporations that caught the attention of federal law enforcement officials.
In addition to their paintings of law-based nonprofits, Bannon and Guo also collaborated on a news website, G News, which published articles suggesting that coronavirus was manufactured through the Chinese army.
In July, Bannon gave the impression of advancing long-term clinical studies supporting his claim that coronavirus came here from a laboratory in Wuhan, China. He told the Daily Mail that lab scientists had “deserted” the US. But it’s not the first time And they were cooperating with U. S. intelligence. In the “War Room: Pandemic” podcast, Bannon welcomed others who speculated that the virus might have been a Chinese “biological weapon,” but said he had the ultimate credible explanation that “he came here from on-the-fly experiments” in this Wuhan lab.
This is a line that has been taken up through some senior American officials. President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo have alluded to intelligence reports that support this theory. “This is circumstantial, of course,” Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AR) wrote in an April column for the Wall Street Journal, “but it’s all up to the Wuhan labs. “
While an accidental leak from the Wuhan virology laboratory remains an imaginable theoretical source of the initial outbreak in the city, the vast majority of the clinical literature on the virus has decided that its origins are herbal and that it was not elaborated in laboratory. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the Trump administration’s coronavirus contact, has continuously pointed out that all the evidence indicates that the virus was not a human.
The study published Monday through Bannon’s organization is therefore incendiary. “This virus is not natural,” said Dra. Li-Meng Yan, one of the scientists who conducted the study, who appeared monday on a British television show. The virus came from a Wuhan meat market as a “smoke screen” designed to mask its true origins.
But virologists disagree and claim that the newspaper makes false statements about a number of basic facts. “Fundamentally, everything is circumstantial and some of them are completely fictional,” Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at Columbia University, told the Daily Beast of the study.
The paper argues that the coronavirus genes are “strangely similar to those of a bat coronavirus discovered through army labs” in China, a claim Rasmussen says is not unexpected because they are “SARS-like coronaviruses. “
The study authors made a similar statement about some of the complex SARS-CoV-2 proteins, which viruses use to break down and infect cells, and wrote that it is similar to the original SARS virus in a “suspicious way” and suggests genetic factors. manipulation. ” SARS-CoV also used ACE2 as a cell receptor, as did other SARS-like BAT coronaviruses,” Explains Rasmussen. “This is not suspicious and is expected to be similar in receptor binding domain names that join the same protein. “
Rasmussen also stated that the article misrepresents the fundamental facts about some other component of complex coronavirus proteins, called furine excision sites. The authors claim that the SARS-CoV-2 spin-out site is “unique” and invisible by nature. But according to Rasmussen, “furine excision sites occur naturally in many other beta-CoVs, adding MERS-CoV and other SARS-type bat coronaviruses.
Yan said he fled China to avoid government retaliation because of his accusations that he was unclear about the origin and nature of the virus. He said he had warned the authorities in December that the virus was highly communicable among humans, but that his claims had been ignored.
The Hong Kong University School of Public Health, where Yan worked, questioned his claims that the university ignored its warnings before the outbreak in China.
In August, Yan gave the impression on Bannon’s podcast. During this broadcast, Bannon stated that he is not yet in the camp and believes that they let him leave intentionally, but I am firmly in the camp from the beginning that he left Wuhan P4. lab. ”
Unrelated to his paintings with law groups, Bannon also faces felony charges for what federal prosecutors see as an effort to extract millions of dollars from a nonprofit’s personal investment for the structure of a wall on the southern border of the United States. blame the fees.
After the article published, Yan gave the impression Tuesday night on Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s stellar program, after Yan reiterated his claims that the virus had developed in a lab and that the Chinese government had deliberately published it, Carlson, who has become one of the loudest skeptics of Fox’s coronavirus : issued a primary warning at the end of the interview.
“Unfortunately, this is not the forum for the main points of his research,” he said. “I don’t have the basics to ask you the right questions, but this is where you need functional means because what you just said fits absolutely everything we think we know about the pandemic that our country is destroying. “
Bannon’s call once appeared in the segment.