Kishida takes off his mask at the first opportunity, so if he is infected, he will undoubtedly be the culprit!
Not commoners who catch Covid.
nothing to see here. Everyone will have it sooner or later. The faster we settle for this, the faster we will move forward.
“I had won 3 injections of vaccine and had taken critical measures against the infection on a regular basis. From my experience, I can say that anyone can get infected,” he said at a normal news conference on Tuesday.
This means that, even as a senior official, he felt that vaccines would prevent infection, like the dominant narrative last year.
Instead of redoubling their efforts to say “we never said vaccines would prevent infection,” other people pass up their epass and honestly admit that vaccines have performed particularly poorly.
Instead of redoubling their efforts to say “we never said vaccines would prevent infection,” other people pass up their epass and honestly admit that vaccines have performed particularly poorly.
They have underperformed to the extent that they absolutely block the virus.
But to no vaccine, they look immensely better, and there is no comparison.
Oh, sorry, did you leave the genuine global out of your rhetoric?Mea culpa.
The resurgence of COVID-19 has affected many close aides to Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida, raising concerns about day-to-day operations and the threat of him becoming infected. “
So what’s the challenge? Kishida will ignite faster or later, like dozens of other world leaders. With Japan’s most productive doctor at your disposal, you’ll actually triumph over a sore throat and cold in a few days.
This is what happens when we give in to foreign tension and open the borders to foreigners.
That’s what happens when you give in to foreign tension and open the borders to foreigners. “
The same old racist gossip. yawn.
This is what happens when we give in to foreign tension and open the borders to foreigners.
Says the one who writes in a foreign language. Strange.
Yes, it is more suitable for the Yahoo Japan site.
It’s an undeniable mathematical thing. Viruses are small, but we humans are becoming more numerous. So if he continues to embrace them, they will suffocate us Americans and in the economy and society. But I don’t expect that enough other people will be able to make even the undeniable maximum calculations, so they will probably continue with statements as if we forgot about this and are fortunately still living with viruses. The challenge is that it can’t and possibly won’t work.
This means that, even as a senior official, he felt that vaccines would prevent infection, like the dominant narrative last year.
No, this implies that all measures taken (including, but not limited to, vaccines) help decrease the threat of infection, which is true.
Instead of doubling the return, “we never said vaccines would prevent infection. “
Well, that’s true, since other people who repeat this type of straw don’t provide evidence that experts have ever said that vaccines would be effective in preventing infections, regardless of which variants appeared. Why avoid correcting this false data every time it is repeated?himself?
people let their epass pass and honestly admit that vaccines have performed particularly poorly.
People who professionally treat vaccines, infections, epidemics, etc. explicitly contradict your beliefs, what proof do you have that they are all wrong?
It’s a mathematical thing. Viruses are small, but humans are becoming more numerous. So if you continue to embrace them, they will suffocate us Americans and the economy and society.
Humans have lived with viruses, and for a long time very little can be done against infection, if your theory were true, there would be no civilization at all now.
When there is no realistic way to eliminate a virus, the only option you have is to decrease the threat of infection as much as possible and live with it.
Instead of redoubling their efforts to say “we never said vaccines would prevent infection,” other people pass up their epass and honestly admit that vaccines have performed particularly poorly.
By the way!
While I can’t stand Pfizer’s CEO, I appreciate that he has at least admitted a few times that vaccines have little effect on omicron infection and transmission.
The fact that countries with the most vaccines also tend to have the most cases may be due in part to the fact that those vaccines turn many other people into asymptomatic spreaders; have little (if any) effect on viral load while reducing symptoms. . .
Yes, it is more suitable for the Yahoo Japan site.
What a vile mess of nationalist nonsense this is.
nothing to see here. Everyone will have it sooner or later. The faster we settle for this, the faster we will move forward.
It is possible that one day I will catch Covid. . . But I will still be a highly guilty adult in the vast majority of guilty adults!Such a positive outlook too. . . just about 115 million other people to catch as we are all getting infected. . . . Impossible to pass from death. . . . These Covid deniers are becoming more and more ridiculous every day. . . .
nothing to see here. Everyone will have it sooner or later. The faster we settle for this, the faster we will move forward.
One day I take Covid. . . But I will still be a highly guilty adult in the vast majority of guilty adults!Such a positive outlook too. . . only about 115 million other people to catch, as we are all going to get infected. . . Impossible to get past death. . . . These Covid deniers are becoming more and more ridiculous throughout the day. . .
Genuine deniers are the ones who honestly believe that mitigation efforts are sustainable and in the end will not lead to the same conclusion. You call it “responsible,” while many call it paranoia. Either way, it’s your choice and I help your choice, just avoid bullying other people into following your illusion.
If you need to stay denying genuine ownership, pass it off. I will enjoy my social life with my friends and family, in many countries that have no unnecessary access restrictions and I will breathe new air without a mask (even indoors, panting!)
It’s just a flu, I would possibly have 10 days of vacation.
nothing to see here. Everyone will have it sooner or later. The faster we settle for this, the faster we will move forward.
Yes, if we haven’t already. About 1 in 10 Japanese have had a proven infection. I suspect that the actual number is much higher (maybe 5-10 times higher), so the vast majority of us have already been infected, we haven’t detected it, and the number of cases will be reduced as soon as we succeed in the immunity herd.
If you need to stay denying genuine ownership, pass it off. I will enjoy my social life with my friends and family, in many countries that have no unnecessary access restrictions and I will breathe new air without a mask (even indoors, panting!)
Until you get sick, which will possibly happen very soon. Fill yourself with water and emergency food,
Defeatist attitudes are the solution to Covid. They allow the virus to mutate and infect more people, ensuring an endless pandemic.
While other people abroad, variants will find a way to survive. Now it is the seventh wave and others will really follow. Allowing yourself to catch each and every variant is obviously not a viable strategy. I don’t pretend to have the answer, however, being sure and following precautions turns out to be the only way to go.
Well, that’s true, since other people who repeat this type of straw don’t provide evidence that experts have ever said that vaccines would be effective in preventing infections, regardless of which variants appeared. Why avoid correcting this false data every time it is repeated?himself?
He is a straw man. That’s a fact.
Do you have any proof that such a thing has not been done through any fitness professional?
People who professionally treat vaccines, infections, epidemics, etc. explicitly contradict your beliefs, what proof do you have that they are all wrong?
There are more people who have been vaccinated and are still inflamed than those who are professionally involved in those vaccines, etc.
Humans have lived with viruses, and for a long time very little can be done against infection, if your theory were true, there would be no civilization at all now.
It is true that viruses would have wiped out all civilization. Do you have any evidence, such as a clinical examination, that concludes this?
When there is no realistic way to eliminate a virus, the only option you have is to decrease the threat of infection as much as possible and live with it.
Do you have a medical examination that involves all global experts in the global conclusion that the only option is the threat of infection as much as possible?Let’s look at that.
While I can’t stand Pfizer’s CEO, I appreciate that he has at least admitted a few times that vaccines have little effect on omicron infection and transmission.
So now advocating trusting CEOs when they contradict clinical evidence: this is called having double standards and is evidence of deep bias.
The fact that countries with the most vaccines also tend to have the most cases may be due in part to the fact that those vaccines turn many other people into asymptomatic spreaders.
Without evidence, it does not make sense, it is much more likely that countries that have points that increase the spread are also the ones that make the most efforts to vaccinate their populations, precisely to reduce the threat that these infections can represent.
About 1 in 10 Japanese have had an overt infection. I suspect that the actual number is much higher (perhaps 5-10 times higher),
According to your argument all the instances we see now (including hospitalized and deceased) are reinfections (since 10X of 10% is 100%), this that being inflamed is a very poor coverage against reinfection, contrary to what you also believe. This self-contradiction comes from believing contradictory things according to convenience.
He is a straw man. That’s a fact.
But you’re not generating any evidence that this has been said by an expert, prove otherwise, just a kind of straw invented through anti-scientific teams to have something to attack, even if no one has ever said it.
Do you have any proof that such a thing has not been done through any fitness professional?
The absence of any evidence that this is said is the evidence that results in the argument. When you let your opponent defend your point of view, you recognize that you are not capable of doing so.
It is true that viruses would have wiped out all civilization.
Since the comment explicitly says that letting viruses do it means it’s wrong, what argument do you have to verify that the literal meaning of what’s written is incorrect?
Do you have any evidence as a clinical conclusion from this?
That’s the point, the fact that we’re here, even living with viruses for millennia without effective measures, means the argument is absurd. What evidence do you think is needed to verify that humans are alive on the planet right now?
Do you have a medical examination that involves all global experts in the global conclusion that the only option is the threat of infection as much as possible?Let’s look at that.
You seem to be extraordinarily between a logical argument and one that is based on evidence. In your opinion, what reference is needed to make doing the imaginable the most productive option versus doing the unimaginable?Or do you just ask for evidence without any logic because you think it’s an argument?
The LDP led by Kishida-san is the one of the world. . . with the largest number of instances consistent with capital:
https://www. nytimes. com/interactive/2021/world/covid-cases. html
therefore, of course, all the members of your team are now all infected. Rest assured, there’s no need to worry, as each and every one also travels on the packed Yamanote every day like the rest of us.
About 1 in 10 Japanese have had an overt infection. I suspect that the actual number is much higher (perhaps 5-10 times higher),
According to his argument, all we see now (including hospitalized patients and deaths) are reinfections (since 10X of 10% is 100%).
Yes, and 5X 10% is 50%. So we are between 50% and 100%. As we get to 100%, the numbers will pass. Keep in mind that about 20% are pre-omicron.
this that being inflamed is a very poor coverage against reinfection, against what you also believe. This self-contradiction comes from believing contradictory things according to convenience.
Given the high vaccination rate, this also means that being vaccinated is a very poor coverage against infection. Unfortunately, many of those who were inflamed were vaccinated, which had adverse effects on the overall immune system. . .
Yes, and 5X 10% is 50%. So we are between 50% and 100%. As we get to 100%, the numbers will pass. Keep in mind that about 20% are pre-omicron.
This means it contradicts their earlier conclusion that being inflamed provides sufficient coverage rather than reinfection. If you think the majority of the population is already “immune” to being inflamed, it means they’re not doing anything to prevent infections based on existing figures. You still contradict yourself.
Given the high vaccination rate, this also that being vaccinated is a very poor coverage against infection.
The big difference is that although either thing has limited efficacy in saving you from infections, vaccines pose a much smaller threat, so the only logical option is to vaccinate/strengthen as directed by medical experts because even if you are still at risk of infection Severe headaches are much less, on the other hand, being inflamed still can’t prevent you from a new infection with the added costs of having to deal with all the threats of infection, which are far greater than those that come with vaccines.
Unfortunately, many of those who were inflamed were vaccinated, which had adverse effects on the overall immune system.
This is absolutely false and is based on contradicting the conclusions of the authors of the report that are misrepresented, if the authors conclude that being vaccinated and reinforced is better, even for other people who have become inflamed before other people who take their exam to say in a different way provides notorious false data to deceive other people.
Given the high vaccination rate, this also that being vaccinated is a very poor coverage against infection.
The big difference is that, although both have limited efficacy in preventing infections, vaccines constitute a much lower risk.
To avoid (re)infections, herbal immunity is much better. And vaccines have no lower risk. More young people died in Japan last year after receiving the vaccine than covid deaths. The virus is now much milder, but not the vaccine. And the vaccine is dangerous every time you get it. . .
Obviously, I would provide evidence of that if I had one.
Again, since you provided some reference to an expert who once said this, this page is evidence that it is fake. This verbal exchange is evidence that his argument is unfounded.
So you don’t have any proof yet.
No, it is you who provides any evidence, thus proving my point.
Continue to make claims any supporting evidence
I asked him explicitly what evidence he thinks is necessary, his lack of reaction obviously shows that he now perceives that no evidence is needed, it also shows that he has no argument to refute the logic used in my argument. It’s an indirect way of blatantly acknowledging that you’re wrong, but I guess not everyone has the ability to admit that they’re wrong.
To avoid (re)infections, herbal immunity is much better.
No, this is not the case, as it requires the user to become inflamed and run all the dangers once, which means it is as useful as losing the hand in additional accidental amputations. What he needs to save him has already happened, it is not “better”, in fact it is worse.
More young people died in Japan last year after receiving the vaccine than Covid deaths
Since it makes a lot of sense that young people with a much greater threat of death due to serious physical disorders are
1. – vaccinated as far as possible
2. – Withdrawal by all imaginable means to avoid contagion.
This means that your argument proves nothing, variety bias is enough for differences. Another case would be if it can only provide epidemiological evidence that young people have a higher risk of dying than an organization with the same demographics, however, since it evidently does not have that information, its argument remains unfounded.
The virus is now much milder, however, the vaccine.
Omicron is much riskier than any of the vaccines, you are left repeating the opposite, but when you are asked for evidence to back it up, you never provide it, it would imply that it is an unfounded non-public opinion that is blatantly contradicted through clinical consensus.