Elhayani accused Netanyahu of losing the “leadership value” of Likud’s founder and former prime minister, Menachem Begin, whose annexation of East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights.
When asked if the Prime Minister was left-wing, he replied that if one “examines his actions,” it is clear that “he is left-wing and not right-wing.”
In a radio appearance last week, Elhayani said that if Netanyahu had given up the plan to apply Israeli sovereignty to settlements, “it needed to be replaced.”
Despite Elhayani’s claims that Netanyahu “deceived” the settlers, Likud officials who spoke to the Twelfth Channel blamed the leadership for the government’s failure in sovereignty, noting that “no matter what we brought to the table, they were not happy.”and claiming that they had tried to infuriate US President Donald Trump’s evangelical base opposed to US President Donald Trump’s proposal.
In an interview with army radio on Sunday, Netanyahu downplayed the complaints on the right.
“The same other people who are now telling me to apply sovereignty [in the West Bank] told me several months ago that we will have not to apply sovereignty because it will lead to a Palestinian state,” the prime minister said.”It’s not serious.”
They outraged Dagan, the head of the Samaria Regional Council.
In a statement, Dagan said Netanyahu “embarrassedly failed to fulfill his central promise in three election cycles that gave him victory.”Now, he added, the prime minister “adds an insult to the wound and adopts left-wing rhetoric by blaming the settlers’ motion for everything.”
Yisrael Gantz, head of Binyamin Regional Council, accused Netanyahu of “deceiving the public” and said the prime minister had promised “the sovereignty of a Palestinian state.”
“If your goal had been to announce the annexation with a Palestinian state, it is smart that you have set it aside and it is smart that we fight it, but it is a pity that I told the Israeli public,” Gantz said.Don’t try to introduce us now as extremists.”
However, all colonial leaders adopted a hard line against Netanyahu following Thursday’s announcement.
Efrat’s local council chairman, Oded Revivi, said the agreement with the United Arab Emirates “is good news for an agreement.”Even if it’s not “the dream we dream …it’s definitely a step in the right direction,” reported the devout Zionist news site Kipa.
– Oded Revivi עודד רביבי (@odedrevivi) 13 August 2020
According to Revivi, settlements have been seen as an impediment to regional peace efforts for years.But Israel’s fledgling gulf states has shown that “peace can come even without moving Jews from their homes.”
Netanyahu insisted Thursday that his plan to apply Israeli sovereignty to about 30% of the West Bank, which covers settlements and the Jordan Valley, had been “temporarily detained” at the request of US President Donald Trump, but remained “committed” to implementation.in full coordination with the United States.
Netanyahu’s right-wing politicians criticized him harshly last week, and Yamina’s leader, MP Naftali Bennett, accused him of “breaking a once-in-a-century opportunity” and Yamina’s MP Bezalel Smotrich called on the national field that “present a leadership of choice.” Prime ministers.
Sensing developing discontent among their settler base, many Likud ministers said it imperative not to renounce annexation.
Even before Thursday’s announcement, it became known that Netanyahu’s annexation plans were going to move forward any time soon.
The annexation largely displaced by coronavirus in a public speech and in July, army radio reported that Knesset President Yariv Levin had told his affiliates that no attention was paid to the factor in Washington, so the prime minister was unlikely to advance it., because it didn’t need to happen without coordinating with the Trump administration.