In a recent study published in the journal PLoS One, researchers look at telehealth arrangements and cancer that were held in U. S. hospitals. The U. S. Department of Health was used in the U. S. before the onset of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in addition to examining sociodemographic and geographic correlates of telehealth access.
Geography plays a major role in determining access to high-quality care and treatment for cancer patients, and outcomes for cancer patients in rural America are worse at all stages compared to those living in non-rural areas.
Several studies have known correlations between geographic barriers and reduction to high-quality cancer care for patients with lung, colon, breast, esogamum, rectum, and gynecologic cancers. An asymmetric distribution of oncologists and cancer professionals relative to patient populations, as well as the concentration of complex cancer care services in high-volume centers, have been attributed to differences in the availability of cancer treatments.
Telehealth plays a key role in bridging this gap by offering cancer patients in rural areas outreach facilities. This also allows oncologists in rural areas to connect with cancer specialists in other regions for consultations.
While telehealth services have grown particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, little is known about telehealth’s involvement in cancer care.
In the existing study, researchers conducted a retrospective cross-sectional investigation of knowledge from the American Hospital Association’s (AHA) 2019 Annual Hospital Survey and Information Technology Supplement, the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC) and the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC), and the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC), and the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC) and the U. S. Department of Agriculture’s 2013 Urban Influence Codes (UIC) and the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and the U. S. Department of Agriculture, and the U. S. Department of TThe U. S. Department of Health Services and 2018 Regional Health Resource Resource Archives (HRSA) is a member of the U. S. Department of Health.
Based on the availability of telehealth and cancer care in hospitals within their boundaries, counties were classified based on low, moderate, or higher access. In addition, a geospatial data mapping formula was used to map access to hospital telehealth similar to cancer care. Statistical analyses were used for correlations between sociodemographic points and access to cancer care and telehealth at the hospital and county levels.
For the identity of geographic spaces with county point accessibility to telehealth and oncology care, telehealth and oncology were grouped at the hospital point, with counties classified into 3 groups.
Low-access counties had no hospitals within barriers providing cancer care or telehealth facilities. Moderate-access counties included those whose hospitals had telehealth or cancer care, but neither, while high-access counties had hospitals offering cancer care and telehealth services.
The opposite sociodemographic points at which telefitness and cancer care were analyzed included age, gender, race and ethnicity, English language proficiency, broadband, and fitness insurance.
About forty-five percent of the 4540 hospitals included in the study were classified in the high-access group, had cancer care services and offered telehealth services. The moderate-access group, which provided telehealth or cancer services, accounted for 6% of the hospitals examined, while 18. 6% of the hospitals did not offer telehealth or cancer care services.
Of the 3152 counties evaluated in this study, 1288 in 41 U. S. states are in the U. S. UU. no had access to telehealth or cancer care services in hospitals. These counties have a total population of 26. 6 million.
In low-access counties, the average population for each number one care physician is 3447, which is much more consistent than in moderate- and high-access counties, which had an average population of 2714 and 1706, consistent with the number one care physician, respectively. In addition, the likelihood that cancer care services will be provided according to large accredited hospitals, as well as hospitals with a Medicaid and Medicare hospitalization day ratio.
Native American and Alaska Native populations had less availability of high-quality cancer care and telehealth services. Not surprisingly, cancer death rates also showed the greatest disparity between rural and urban spaces between these two ethnic populations. The distribution of Native American and Alaska Native populations in low, moderate, and high access counties is 10. 6%, 6%, and 3. 8%, respectively.
The effects of the study highlight the need to advocate for rural hospitals to connect through telefitness centers with reference centers to take advantage of the benefits of subspecialty consultations without having to travel long distances. Additionally, state and federal fitness equity advocates deserve to activate mechanisms for Local Care Services for citizens of low-access counties and provision of access to services in adjacent counties.
Telehealth services can help provide high-quality diagnostic services, even if cancer care is not available in those counties, to allow for greater treatment decisions.
Overall, the availability and distribution of high-quality cancer care and telehealth services vary significantly in the United States, and 8. 4% of the population does not have access to adequate cancer care due to geographic barriers. Therefore, equitable access to cancer services and care is urgent. necessary to reduce geographical disparities.
Written by
Chinta Sidharthan is a Bangalore-based India. Su academic background is in evolutionary biology and genetics, and has extensive experience in clinical studies, teaching, clinical writing and herpetology. Chinta holds a PhD in evolutionary biology from the Indian Institute of Science and is passionate about science education, writing, animals, wildlife and conservation. For his doctoral studies, he explored the origins and diversification of blind snakes in India, where he did extensive fieldwork in the jungles of southern India. He has won the Governor Award General Bronze Medal and Gold Medal for Academic Excellence from the University of Bangalore and has published his studies in high-impact journals.
Use one of the following to cite this article in your essay, article, or report:
AAP
Sidharthan, Chinta. (2023, 05 February). Rural areas in the United States have far less telehealth and cancer care services. Retrieved March 4, 2023, from https://www. news-medical. net/news/20230205/Rural-spaces-in-the-U. S. have-significantly-less–to-telehealth-and-cancer-care-services. aspx.
deputy
Sidharthan, Chinta. ” Rural Spaces in the U. S. They have far fewer telehealth and cancer care services. “News-Medical. 04 March 2023. .
Chicago
Sidharthan, Chinta. ” Rural Spaces in the U. S. They have far fewer telehealth and cancer care services. “-have-significantly-less–to-telehealth-and-cancer-care-services. aspx. (ED 4 March 2023).
Harvard
Sidharthan, Chinta. 2023. Rural spaces in the United States have much less for telehealth services and cancer care. News-Medical, ed March 4, 2023, https://www. news-medical. net/news/20230205/Rural-spaces-in-the-U. S. U. S. -have-much-less–to-telehealth-and-cancer-care-services. aspx.
News-Medical. net – An AZoNetwork website
Owned and operated through AZoNetwork, © 2000-2023