Studies have shown that COVID-19 increases the threat of central headaches and that the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination outweigh the threats to men and women of all age groups. However, social media posts misinterpreted and posted a critique claiming to have known a correlation between emergency calls for cardiac cases and vaccination rates in Israel.
More than a billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been administered in the United States and only a few very rare manifestations of protection have emerged. The vast majority of people enjoy only minor, transient side effects, such as injection site pain, fatigue, headaches or muscle pain, or no side effects. As the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has stated, those vaccines “have gone through and will continue to go through the most extensive protective surveillance in U. S. history. “USA. “
A small number of severe allergic reactions known as anaphylaxis, which are expected with any vaccine, have occurred with licensed and approved COVID-19 vaccines. Fortunately, such reactions are rare, occur within minutes of inoculation, and can be treated. According to the CDC, about five out of every one million vaccinated people have suffered anaphylaxis after a COVID-19 vaccine.
To ensure that severe allergic reactions can be detected and treated, all other people receiving a vaccine will be observed for 15 minutes after being vaccinated, and anyone who has suffered anaphylaxis or had an immediate allergic reaction to a vaccine or injection in the past. be monitored for part of an hour. People who have had a severe allergic reaction to a previous dose or to any of the ingredients in the vaccine will not be immunized. In addition, those who do not get one type of COVID-19 vaccine will be monitored for 30 minutes after receiving some other type. of vaccine
Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna mRNA vaccines rarely cause inflammation of the central muscle (myocarditis) or surrounding mucosa (pericarditis), especially in adolescents and young adult males.
According to knowledge collected through August 2021, notification rates for any of the conditions in the United States are highest among men older than 16 to 17 years after the current dose (105. 9 instances consistent with millions of doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine), followed by 12 to 15 years of male (70. 7 cases equivalent to millions). The rate in older men aged 18 to 24 years 52. 4 cases and 56. 3 cases equivalent to millions of doses of Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively.
Health officials have noted that vaccine-related cases of myocarditis and pericarditis are rare and that the benefits of vaccination outweigh the risks. Preliminary evidence suggests that those cases of myocarditis are less severe than typical cases. The CDC also noted that most of the treated patients “responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. “
The Johnson Vaccine
According to the CDC, TTS occurred in about four more people based on millions of doses administered. In early April, the syndrome appeared in 60 cases, adding up to nine deaths, after more than 18. 6 million doses of the J vaccine.
Vaccine J
link to this
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a giant published this year in Nature Medicine found that COVID-19 increases the risk of several heart conditions, including heart attacks, arrhythmias, strokes, cardiac arrests, and myocarditis.
Myocarditis, inflammation of the central muscle, and pericarditis, inflammation of the outer wall of the center, are known as rare side effects of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, especially in young men after a momentary dose. the dangers for men and women of all ages.
Some news articles, widely shared online, highlighted a disputed study that claimed to find a building in emergency medical service calls for central events in other young people when COVID-19 vaccines were rolled out in Israel. Some of those stories misinterpreted those locations,falsely claiming that the study found that vaccines caused a buildup in EMS calls. But the study, which several scientists say has many flaws, only points to the correlation.
“New Peer-Reviewed Study: COVID-19 Vaccines Increase Threat of Cardiac Arrest in Other Young People by 25%,” says the misnomer of an article published May 4 in The Epoch Times.
The study, published April 28, looked at the rates of emergency medical calls for cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome among other seniors aged 16 to 39 in Israel during the pandemic. The authors, affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Sloan School of Management and the marketing and foreign relations department of Israel’s national organization Magen David Adom, found a 25% increase in calls for cardiovascular events during the vaccination campaign. Although the authors do not identify a causal date between the accumulation in calls and vaccines, they state that the calls “were particularly related to the rates of vaccine doses 1 and 2 administered to this age organization, but not to COVID-19 infection rates. “
“The findings raise questions about the serious undetected vaccine-induced cardiovascular effects and underscore the already established causal dating between vaccines and myocarditis, a common cause of unforeseen cardiac arrest in young people,” the authors wrote in the abstract.
After its publication, the study was heavily criticized online and viewed 518,000 times, receiving one of the highest attention scores assigned by a knowledge company that tracks the quality and quantity of online care for published research.
“Unfortunately, despite the cautious language used by the authors, this paper obviously does not meet sufficient criteria of clinical rigor,” reads an unpublished manuscript calling for the retraction of the study, published online on May 5 and signed by 10 scientists. the authors described their research as “not building causal relationships”. . . in fact, they have not even established useful correlations. The article fails the fundamental statistical and epidemiological examination, which questions whether the effects “actually generate on serious undetected cardiovascular effects induced by the vaccine”. . . or whether the reported weak correlations are simply the result of insufficient and inadequate methodology. The options. “
The study, which has been dubbed the MIT review published in Nature, is not published in the prestigious clinical journal Nature. It was published in Scientific Reports, a peer-reviewed open access journal that is part of the Nature Portfolio, an organization of journals that includes Nature published through Springer Nature.
On May 5, the newspaper added a note alerting readers that “the conclusions of this article are cause for complaint that is being reviewed by the editors. “
But that didn’t stop online publications from mentioning the study to suggest the vaccines caused harm, without mentioning any of the disputes. New versions of the story continued to appear in June.
Rafal Marszalek, editor-in-chief of Scientific Reports, told us in an email that the investigation into the article is still ongoing and that he may simply not comment on it for privacy reasons. “carefully, in accordance with COPE rules and Springer Nature policies,” he wrote, referring to criteria established through the Publications Ethics Committee.
As we explained earlier, the Scientific Reports study analyzed data from Israel’s national EMS, which handles all emergency medical calls in Israel, and analyzed all calls related to cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome from January 1, 2019 to June 20, 2021. The call knowledge set was connected to COVID-19 infection rates and vaccination rates over the same period.
The authors looked at how the number of calls replaced the pandemic and vaccination crusade compared to the pre-pandemic period, and found more than 25% increases in calls for either occasion from January to May 2021 compared to 2019 and 2020. They concluded that there was a “strong and statistically significant relationship” between the number of calls and vaccines given to other people over the age of 16 to 39.
But critics said the correlation was “clinically irrelevant” and that there were several disruptions with methodology, statistical research and knowledge visualization.
The call database used in the study, for example, did not include the patients’ vaccination status, COVID-19 status, or any underlying comorbidities. Therefore, there is no way to know if calls are piling up for vaccinated people or if they had COVID-19 or any other illness that may have caused the cardiac event. The authors identify it as the “main limitation” of the study.
“These problems of lack of knowledge make any interpretation and extrapolation irrelevant,” wrote the authors of the rebuttal manuscript, titled “Should We Publish Every Correlation During the COVID-19 Pandemic?
Critics of the Study from the Scientific Reports also pointed out that the difference in the number of calls is not really large and that since the occurrence of cardiac events varies greatly by year and season and may be due to several variables, the correlation could be just a coincidence. Since there is no data until 2019, some said it was difficult to perceive how those changes compare to previous years.
A vaccine expert organization called Voices for Vaccines hypothesized that the buildup could also be similar to resuming physical activity as COVID-19 cases declined and the weather warmed, for example.
Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz, an epidemiologist who is running for his PhD at the University of Wollongong in Australia and one of the authors of the rebuttal, the paper’s graphics are “INCREDIBLY misleading. “
“The authors have 3 axes, one of which starts at 4, and it’s incredibly simple to manipulate the axes to completely eliminate that obvious relationship,” he wrote on Twitter about the study. By downloading the knowledge and creating a corrected graph, he also found that COVID-19 cases appear to be more similar to cardiac arrest calls than to vaccines.
As a result, it turns out that COVID-19 instances are more strongly connected to CA calls than to vaccines!pic. twitter. com/gjJgksVjnb
– Health Nerd (@GidMK) May 5, 2022
The authors of the rebuttal also noted that the study authors had made several “imprecise and confusing statistical decisions. “knowledge base on COVID-19 infections that recorded instances for the organization aged 0 to 39 years.
“Simply. . . false? You can’t “approximate” COVID-19 cases for one age organization to another, even if they overlap. The threat of contracting COVID-19 is highly variable by age, which can easily confuse any correlation you see,” Meyerowitz-Katz wrote on Twitter.
Meyerowitz-Katz added that the authors used post-hoc force analysis, an approach that has been criticized for being misleading.
Some of the study locations also contradict the clinical evidence on myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination. For example, as we reported, peak cases of vaccine-induced myocarditis were observed in young men, after a momentary dose of mRNA vaccines. But the study doesn’t find much difference in calls after doses one and two, and neither type of call is higher in women than in men. that myocarditis appears within two weeks of vaccination. “But according to CDC data, most cases of myocarditis occur within days of vaccination.
One of the authors, Retsef Levi, told us in an email that the study’s findings are “simply a correlation and not causal!”and that the article suggests that more studies be conducted to “better perceive the causal mechanisms that can be any mixture of COVID-19 infections, vaccines, and potentially other factors, such as adjustments in patient behaviors. “
He told us that the article was motivated “by the known fact that COVID-19 infections and vaccines can lead to adverse cardiac effects, for example, myocarditis. “accepted statistical strategies to examine the temporal correlations between infections, the vaccination point and the respective so-called EMS WEEKS”.
“I do not support any interpretation of the article as proof that vaccines caused this accumulation in emergency medical service calls. The article only shows the correlation and calls for extensive factor verification and exploration of every conceivable cause,” he wrote.
Israel’s Health Ministry also evaluated Levi’s claims and found that the knowledge did not affect them, in line with other Israeli studies.
Jeffrey S. Morris, director of the Division of Biostatistics in the Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics Breakdown at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, said the study appeared to be part of a trend.
“A lot of what I see are other people presenting more examples of time series for safe places and times, or more scatter plots, given this validation of a vaccine harm narrative. Often, I don’t see the popularity of the limitations of those approaches. . . or popularity that those are hypotheses that want to be validated,” he wrote on Twitter on May 4, but they are written as evidenced by the fact through his research and only wants confirmation.
Editor’s note: SciCheck’s vaccination/COVID-19 task is made imaginable by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The Foundation has no control over the editorial decisions of FactCheck. org, and the reviews expressed in our articles do not necessarily reflect the Perspectives of the Foundation. The goal of the task is to increase exposure to accurate data on COVID-19 and vaccines, while reducing the effect of erroneous data.
Bloc, Jason P. , et al. ” Cardiac headaches after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination – PCORnet, USAU. S. , January 2021-January 2022. ” Weekly morbidity and mortality report. April 1, 2022.
Xie, Yan, et al. ” Long-term cardiovascular outcomes of COVID-19. “Natural Medicine. 7 February 2022.
Christopher L. F. Sun, et al. ” Increase in cardiovascular emergency cases among the population under 40 in Israel due to the deployment of the vaccine and the third wave of COVID-19. “Scientific reports. 28 April 2022.
Voices for Vaccines (@Voices4Vaccines). ” Recently, an article began circulating in Scientific Reports suggesting that mRNA vaccines could have as-yet-undetected core risks. pass beyond their knowledge. One ? (1)”, 27/1. Twitter. 2 May 2022.
Meyerowitz-Katz, Gideon (@GidMK)”. This article was recently published and has gone incredibly viral, as it implies that COVID-19 vaccines in Israel have caused cardiovascular problems in young people. The article has serious flaws. I am surprised that it was published on 1/n”, 29/1. Twitter. 4 May 2022.
Morris, Jeffrey S. (@jsm2334). ” A lot of what I see are other people presenting more examples of time series for safe places and times, or more scatter plots, given this validation of a vaccine harm narrative. Often, I do I don’t see the popularity of the limitations of those approaches,” 1/2. Twitter. May 4, 2022.
Florens, Nans et al. ” Should we publish each and every correlation of the COVID-19 pandemic? OSF. 5 May 2022.
Rafal Marszalek. Editor-in-Chief of Scientific Reports, email to FactCheck. org Alice Kay, director of communications at Springer Nature. June 8, 2022.
Oster, Matthew E. , et al. ” Myocarditis reported after mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination in the United States from December 2020 to August 2021. “January 25, 2022.
Kracalik, Ian. ” Myocarditis results after COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. “CDC presentation to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. February 4, 2022.
Jaramillo, Catalina. ” COVID-19 vaccination overcomes the rare threat of myocarditis, even in young men. “FactCheck. org. Updated April 5, 2022.
“The fact-checking of the study of Israeli emergency facilities does not show that COVID-19 vaccines cause problems at the center. “Fact-checking via Reuters. 10 May 2022.
“Cardiac arrest and acute coronary syndrome in MDA”. Information Division National Center for Disease Control Ministry of Health, Israel. Retrieved 13 June 2022.
Q. Are other vaccinated and vaccinated people more likely to become inflamed or have the omicron variant than other unvaccinated people?
R. Non. Se vaccinated increases their coverage against COVID-19. Sometimes some basic knowledge might recommend otherwise, but this data cannot be used to evaluate the efficacy of a vaccine.