Pfizer Inc and BioNTech SE announced Tuesday the start in Japan of combined Phase I and Phase II clinical trials of their mND vaccine candidate opposed to coronavirus.
The study will recruit 160 other people between the ages of 20 and 85, the company said in a statement. Previously, they had agreed to supply Japan with 120 million doses of its experimental coronavirus vaccine in the first part of 2021.
Pfizer, who is preparing the vaccine with his German spouse BioNTech, said he can only check if the vaccine is effective as of this month, but also wants knowledge of protecting an overall test of another 44,000 people who may not be. I had until next month.
Japan is committed to ensuring a sufficiently good source of vaccines for its entire population until mid-2021. In addition to Pfizer, it has concluded origin agreements with AstraZeneca Plc and other foreign candidate vaccine brands.
Clinical trials of AstraZeneca’s COVID-19 experimental vaccine and Oxford University resumed in Japan this month after being suspended for the disease of a British volunteer.
Japan is committed to ensuring a sufficiently good source of vaccines for its entire population until mid-2021
If that’s true, I’ll be the first to take it.
Me in vaccines!
A little behind in the race, but all registrations are welcome, the effects are still not there and all new candidates can be safer, more effective or less expensive than those at the forefront.
A very vital detail is the approval of mRN healing clinical trials in Japan, it is said that the country’s overprotection policies are relaxing, at least while the pandemic is active. other people die from preventable diseases and complications, only to make sure everything approved has been tried for about a decade.
Pioneers in the COVID-19 vaccine: Pfizer (with his German wife BioNTech), Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson
WARNING TO MALADIE: NO – Wait, was that intended to save you COVID-19?
SIE THE MORT: NO – Wait, aren’t you going to save other people’s lives at risk?
RELATED: NO- Wait, is it going to spread in the population?
But. . . . REDUCED TOUX AND THE GREAT MAUX (if you have COVID-19): YES. Super. . . That’s great.
INSIRABLEED SIDE EFFECTS already noticed in the final phase:
Bedridly with a fever of more than hours (5 hours or more), tremors, chills, severe headache and shortness of air. Drainage for a day and cannot concentrate. Expect to take the next day off.
The bar got low enough this time for approval
Well. . . it will be loose and you will have fewer coughs and headaches, you will still have the liquid confidence COVID-19 in a syringe.
WARNING TO MALADIE: NO – Wait, was that intended to save you COVID-19?
SIE THE MORT: NO – Wait, wouldn’t it possibly save other people’s lives at risk?
RELATED: NO- Wait, is it going to spread in the population?
Completely wrong. Any approved vaccine should do all 3 things safely.
Getting out of the air that they don’t have power is very easy, the hardest component is proving it, especially since Phase III of clinical trials isn’t even complete, so it’s having the knowledge to get it out.
It’s very bad at misinformation.
Completely wrong. Any approved vaccine will have to do all 3 things safely.
Getting out of the air that doesn’t have power is very easy, the hardest component is proving it, especially since Phase III of clinical trials isn’t even complete, so it’s having the knowledge to get it out.
It’s very bad at misinformation.
Here:
https://www. forbes. com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/
Author of the Forbes article:
Professor William A. Haeltine
Professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health
Creation of two university departments, the Division of Biochemical Pharmacology and the Division of Human Retrovirology
I’m sure I’ll find a way to kill him and check it out to demystify his experience.
Also, if you want to review the existing appearance effects, here is the CNBC article published this month:
Ultimate Phase III Side Effects:
https://www. cnbc. com/2020/10/01/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-participants-exhaustion-fever-headaches. html
I’m sure you’ll find a way to say that everything will be perfect and that we can anticipate giving it to young people and pregnant mothers.
https://www. forbes. com/sites/williamhaseltine/2020/09/23/covid-19-vaccine-protocols-reveal-that-trials-are-designed-to-succeed/
This surely has no evidence required for your comment, it only indicates that it is apparent that a vaccine is not intended to save the infection but only to the disease, which is exactly the target of each and every vaccine that opposes the pathogens that have been manufactured. It is what is intended to make a vaccine, when the pathogen enters the body, most likely to cause an infection, which will then be aborted by acquired immunity generating a much minor syndrome or even a surely asymptomatic infection, notoriously cutting the threat of death (because there are no headaches) and transmission (because a much smaller amount of virus occurs in the body) Contrary to what Array save Infection youion says is not a mandatory criteria for any vaccine, is not what is intended to be done.
The other challenge is to think that a limited requirement automatically means that each candidate will have only that point of power and security. What is not rational is that the festival alone is sufficient to justify that some applicants are well above this requirement. that this is not true, we want knowledge of the trials, and since Phase III is not even finished, it is for anyone to have it.
There, thank you for offering evidence that your message is incorrect.
I’m sure I’ll find a way to kill him and check it out to demystify his experience.
This article is absolutely useless, this article is enough to turn out to be absolutely out of reach of your experience and makes invalid assumptions that have already become false. The 6-month Phase III trials are not new to this vaccine, they have already been done before and the volunteers included are counted by thousands for candidate. It is not valid to focus on provisional figures as if they were the latest considerations for approval. It is only intended to allow verification, so they are much less stringent than what approval requires.
But even if everything he said was correct, it still means his message is incorrect. One thing is that a vaccine has limited needs to be allowed to complete a clinical trial, another absolutely another is that it is for one of the vaccine applicants. exceed those needs just because they do.
https://www. cnbc. com/2020/10/01/coronavirus-vaccine-trial-participants-exhaustion-fever-headaches. html
So, having an extraordinarily low percentage of other people with significant side effects in a few hours (even if they themselves didn’t know if they had won the vaccine or a placebo) tests one way or they’ll all have it now.
I’m sorry, but it’s absurd, one component of protection needs is that the vaccine is much safer than herbal infection. This obviously includes side effects, any vaccine that is no greater than herbal infection (which is asymptomatic) cannot be approved by definition.
Compare the frequency and severity of side effects between the vaccine and placebo and show that it is particularly superior to the vaccine. What if the numbers are quite the same between the groups?What if the difference is less than 0. 01%?
Again, it does not have the verification effects, seeking to guess what the effects will be and basing your complaint on what you think they will be, the ideals are irrelevant. Bring data, scientifically analyzed.
So it’s a very bad attempt to get incorrect information from other people, and worse, it’s anything that’s already been explained before in some other article, why insist on something you already know to be wrong?It’s almost as if your only purpose is to convince other people of anything they know to be false.
@neowave
Professor William A. Haeltine
Professor at Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health
I hope the teacher will never be able to read how you use his valid considerations (even if they are exaggerated) only to prove one way or another that vaccines are inevitably bad. That’s not what he’s saying, and the boy is a strong supporter of vaccines in general, and he believes that reluctance to vaccinate (or especially anti-anti-cancers) is a huge public aptitude problem.
Extracts from the Forbes article:
“We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent you from a serious illness in case of infection. Three of the vaccination protocols, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, do not require your vaccine to prevent serious illness, only to avoid moderate symptoms that can be as mild as cough or headache. “
“The biggest concern other people have is dying from this disease. A vaccine will have to reduce in a particular or absolute way the number of deaths due to Covid-19. More than two hundred thousand people have died in the United States and nearly a million worldwide. No one lists mortality as a critical parameter. “
“It turns out that all pharmaceutical corporations assume that the vaccine will never save you from infection. Your approval criteria are the difference in symptoms between an inflamed organization and an inflamed vaccinated organization. They do not measure the difference between infection and non-infection as motivation. “”
<< It's amazing and defies common sense that the National Institute of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and others are passing a vaccine that would be distributed to millions of other people on those successful tracks. "
“It turns out that this evidence aims to cross the lowest barrier imaginable of good fortune. “
“It is clear from these studies that vaccines that are being tested lately will be the magic solution to ending the pandemic. “
I am surprised that your confidence has not fallen a bit in this new vaccine and not in the long term AND NOT STUDIES ON FACTS, MONTHS AND THE ELDERLY. . This will help reduce coughing and headaches, while likely causing you more serious side effects (high fever, severe headache, exhaustion, inability to concentrate, out of service for at least one day) that will knock you unconscious for one or two days (and more than one dose a year) Just make sure you have a caregiver present. If you have children, be sure to feel the side effects before deciding to inject twice a year on an annual basis. God forbid everyone gets the shot the same day.
If this COVID-19 vaccine is ahead to:
It won’t prevent transmission
You’ll avoid hospitalization
It won’t stop death
Reduces cough and headaches IF YOU DO COVID-19
With serious side effects in healthy people
Untested in young people and pregnant women (what unwanted side effects will they have?)
NO LONG-TERM STUDIES
You’ll have to be very well paid to keep repeating the narrative that everyone will be waiting for this vaccine without hesitation. Good job. Go to the pharmaceutical industry.
If you can, get vaccinated. There’s been three smart vaccines lately.
BioNTech vaccine produced through Pfizer.
Modern Vaccine.
The others are missed vaccines that cause side effects or offer little protection.
So, having an extraordinarily low percentage of other people with significant side effects in a few hours (even if they themselves didn’t know if they had won the vaccine or a placebo) tests one way or they’ll all have it now.
Now he simply rejects adverse occasions as if they didn’t make sense and that we have nothing to worry about. Array. . . these seriously negative-looking effects happen Array . . . there’s nothing to see here. . . Come on, son!
Here are some discussions about the Forbes article to put things into perspective:
https://thehighwire. com/videos/cracked-teeth-other-covid-vaccine-side-effects/
Extracts from the Forbes article:
Yes, none of these extracts prove that your message is true, you are wrong without hope because you continue to assume that no vaccine will exceed the minimum needs for intermediate evaluation points, not even the ultimate vaccine needs. You’re wrong even if you keep copying and pasting everything you’re supposed to have incomprehension.
Again, as often as necessary, as it turns out that repetition is necessary, the minimum needs are perfectly fine when there is no choice to beat, and can be overcome without any disorder (and will be) especially when there are many applicants competing. . to have the most productive coverage and security.
Neither you nor the article shows evidence that vaccines will not exceed partial and final requirements, which is mandatory if you mean that things “are” or “will be” of “may be”.
So where’s the knowledge I asked in the first place?
I am that your confidence has not waned a bit in this new vaccine and has not returned in the long term AND NO STUDIES ON THE FACTS ON THE FACTS, THE MONTHS AND THE ELDERLY.
This is something that I have already corrected, phase III DO trials monitor elderly patients and other people with comorbidities, in much more detail than herbal infection.
COVID-19 has no long-term studies, so side effects imaginable years after vaccination are likely due to infection, as patients are exposed to millions of times more antigens in a much larger variety than with any developing vaccine. .
So I ask again, why keep using an argument that tastes bad?Is it more vital for you to convince others even about anything that tastes wrong?You.
If this COVID-19 vaccine is ahead to:
It won’t prevent transmission
It won’t stop hospitalization
It won’t stop death
This is the point, IF as something that arises from your imagination, an absolutely hypothetical scenario that may not even prove likely. If something has no benefit, it will not end or be used as smoothly, it is still unlikely to take place on an astronomically low scale. Partial effects have overcome minimum needs without problems, if you don’t like it it doesn’t matter.
At all times it is perfectly imaginable that a safe and effective vaccine will be available for next year, either from applicants who are in a Phase III position or from those who are delayed.
Now he simply rejects adverse occasions as if they didn’t make sense and that we have nothing to worry about. Array. . . these seriously negative-looking effects happen Array . . . there’s nothing to see here. . . Come on, son!
You know what’s so much worse than having a headache for a few hours?Die of COVID-19. Especially when you don’t even know if headaches have anything to do with the vaccine (because at all times it’s imaginable that every user with side effects has a placebo)
Life is perfect, however, if the worst case scenario is that a vaccine gives you an extraordinarily low chance of having a bad day, it would still be greater than a higher chance of spending a few weeks in the ICU with whom you know how long the sequelae will last or even die of infection.
Here are some discussions about the Forbes article to put things into perspective:
So when other people ask you the obligatory minimum to turn out that one of your false alarmist statements is based on reality, is your only answer a video?And a horribly discredited antivaxxer source who continually lied about very vital problems just to make a profit?unexpected insisting on repeating things he knows are wrong with such bad examples.
Again, if you don’t have the data, why is it so hard to settle for it?
You know what’s so much worse than having a headache for a few hours?Die of COVID-19. Especially when you don’t even know if headaches have anything to do with the vaccine (because at all times it’s imaginable that every user with side effects has a placebo)
Life is perfect, however, if the worst case scenario is that a vaccine gives you an extraordinarily low chance of having a bad day, it would still be greater than a higher chance of spending a few weeks in the ICU with whom you know how long the sequelae will last or even die of infection.
I’m sure you’re right. We want to vaccinate with this COVID-19 vaccine matrix . . . for a “fatal” coronavirus.
According to the most recent immunological studies, the overall lethality of Covid-19 (IFR) in the general population is between 0. 1% and 0. 5% in countries at most, which is comparable to the average influenza pandemics of 1957 and 1968. * “
https://swprs. org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/
I know you’re going to visit to discredit this site (as you do with each and every one of the sites that don’t agree with your story, the pharmacy doesn’t hurt), so check out its resources on the charts. outside, the graphics are all there.
Of course. . . let’s be afraid. This will help sell the pharmaceutical narrative that making your circle of relatives revel in serious adverse situations (or a threat of) is best for reducing coughing and headaches (even if it doesn’t prevent infection, transmission, hospitalization and death from COVID -19).
I’m sure you’re right. We want to vaccinate with this COVID-19 vaccine matrix . . . for a “fatal” coronavirus.
More deadly than any vaccine used lately? Yes, and hugely No vaccine used lately has even one-tenth of COVID-19 mortality
(and no, given how much he likes to repeat the lies shown, Fluzone does NOT have a higher fatality rate, the vaccine is intended for an elderly population that by itself has a great death threat, the vaccine increases this threat at all)
I know you’re going to visit to discredit this site (as you do with each and every one of the sites that don’t agree with your story, the pharmacy doesn’t over-check out its resources on the charts. outside, the graphics are all there.
Of course not, the Swiss propaganda studies site is discrediting itself as a source of lies, misleading data and lies, coming from the same name, which actually has nothing to do with Swiss. a vaccine is even comparable to the threat of COVID, which I have already corrected.
Propaganda is well known as an invalid data source as its bias is a component of theArray project, it is a well-informed data error on its own merits.
Of course. . . let’s be afraid.
You mean repeating the proven lies founded on any clinical knowledge and using a teacher’s considerations to justify your sesathed opinion that we deserve to worry about vaccines because the needs to continue a trial are not perfect?No, I’m sorry, wisdom and truth, reliable and well-backed. through evidence are the herbal enemy of worry, anything you check to use it to push others to believe things you can’t prove.
This will help sell the pharmaceutical narrative that making your circle of relatives revel in serious adverse situations (or a threat of) is best for cutting cough and headaches (even if you don’t avoid infection, transmission, hospitalization and COVID-19 death).
Again, wrong. I asked you to have clinical knowledge to verify that your ideals have something to do with reality, but that you supposedly don’t have any, which means it’s wrong, false, misleading.
There is nothing to prevent a vaccine from being effective and safe, like all other vaccines used today, something that even your own source (Professor William A. Haeltine) repeats constantly.
So far, all he has shown is that he doesn’t like this genuine choice and that he’s not above showing lies to protect his beliefs. That’s not valid.
None of the vaccines indexed in this article meet my acceptance requirements. Remember how hydroxychloroquine, a drug used with good luck for 70 years, was thankfully pushed out through healthcare corporations employing minor side effect claims and claiming that it is widely used, it hasn’t been tested enough to be sure. Truly true, it is so moderate that there was no money to be made, we couldn’t even figure out if it was useful when the infection started. They gave it on purpose only to dying patience, knowing that at this point it was too past to tell a difference. So I say this to compare it now to vaccines that are being rushed regardless of incomplete trials and the effects of the primary aspects. The Russians have done a lot more research, they explained in detail why and how their vaccine deserves to work, they did some initial tests and moderate tests and yet each and every cat and mouse screams that they are going to be fast and that there is no no aspect. effects, there are no effects. Array I think I’ll gladly keep my distance and my mask for now and let the suction cups help Pharmas get rich.
I mentioned forbs’ article.
Only the J test
The first vaccine is intended to reassure others with a higher rate of side effects imaginable compared to a well-proven vaccine.
At this point, it is just a matter of general control of physical fitness problems, of individual preservation. This will come with time and genuine full trials (phase III with mortality rate comparison).
who wants vaccines? According to Trump, his son becomes inflamed and recovers after 2 SECONDS. I’m speechless in the face of this. Good luck to my expensive American friends
Remember how hydroxychloroquine, a drug that has been used effectively for 70 years, has been effectively expelled through fitness care companies that claim to have minor side effects and claim that it is widely used, has not undergone enough testing to be safe. reasonable that there was no cash
I think the genuine explanation for why is that no advantages have been shown to be gained in various studies. The cash argument is not up held. Dexamethasone is widely used in the Covid 19 remedy complex and is relatively inexpensive (even Trump took it).
https://www. sciencenews. org/article/covid-19-coronavirus-hydroxychloroquine-no-evidence-treatment
None of the vaccines indexed in this article meet my acceptance requirement
It is fortunate that his acceptance is not such in public aptitude decisions, especially since he does not even have the knowledge for trials, so it sounds more like prejudice than a well-documented trial.
Remember how hydroxychloroquine, a drug that has been used effectively for 70 years, has been effectively expelled through fitness care corporations that use claims of minor side effects and claim that it is widely used, has not undergone enough testing to be safe.
HCQ succeeded, but only for pathologies in which it had proven its effectiveness, every few years, it tried to oppose a new disease and failed several times. As in COVID-19, the challenge is not the minor side effects (not so minor in fact) however, its use has no advantages over this disease, so its use does not make sense.
The real reason, it’s so reasonable that there’s no cash to make, we couldn’t even find out if it was useful in the first levels of infection. They voluntarily gave it to a dying patience, knowing that at this level it had also happened because of the difference.
No, it is a myth, demonstrated smoothly as such through dexamethasone, which is also very reasonable and cannot be effective with it, however, it is identified as effective and safe, many hcQ studies have been conducted where it has no infection. headaches and death. This includes even healthy people.
So I say this to compare it now with vaccines that are rushing regardless of incomplete trials and primary effects.
No vaccine is rushed for next year, they adhere to a timetable used for other vaccines that are being used lately and all have side effects, as long as they are lower in grade and number than herbal infection, which is not a problem.
The Russians have researched much more, explained in detail why and how their vaccines work, performed initial tests and moderate tests, and yet each and every cat and mouse screams that they are going to be fast and since there are no side effects, there are side effects. no effects either.
Everyone can know how anything deserves to work, however, for vaccines, 6 months is the minimum time to corroborate with some degree of certainty that things are as safe as they should be. As far as we know, the Russian vaccine is safe and effective, however, the challenge is that not enough time has been tested to be certain that it can be used in the general population, and that is a moral challenge.
I think I’ll gladly keep my distance and mask for now and let the Pharmas suction cups get rich.
The “Pharmas” are greatly enriched with fewer vaccines, a user who visits the ICU leaves more cash than a thousand vaccines sold, that is an argument in favor of vaccines, not against.
Boy, a lot of them in wheelchairs ring here.
simply take your own resolution on the recommendation of genuine doctors.
I don’t want to waste any more time than that.
Pharmas are greatly enriched by fewer vaccines, a user visiting the ICU leaves more effective than a thousand vaccines sold, that is an argument for vaccines, not against vaccines.
Pharmacies make a fortune promoting vaccines and then make a greater fortune treating vaccine complications.
There are many experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of HCQ. Early management of low doses, preferably with zinc, has been shown to be effective and available.
Unfortunately, some in experiments in which large doses of zinc-free HCQ were administered in complex stages of infection, as if they were looking for experiments to fail.
https://www. youtube. com/watch?v=2uzXHnUViro
Pharmacies make a fortune by promoting vaccines and then make a greater fortune in treating vaccine complications.
Not even a peanut compared to the sale of remedies, especially for complications, because any complication that requires remedy is so rare that it probably wouldn’t make sense to consider it. The confusion comes from a deep disrecognise of everything similar to fitness. services, other people without understanding see, for example, 500 deaths of other vaccinated people and their ignorance makes them think “oh, another 500 people died from the vaccine” without taking an additional few seconds to read it, an equivalent population of other un vaccinated people counted six hundred deaths.
There are many experiments that demonstrate the effectiveness of HCQ. Early management of low doses, preferably with zinc, has been shown to be effective and available.
The last time I asked him about these “experiences”, both one of the reports he made was very small, he gained advantages and all perfectly due to a variety bias that even the authors of the accepted reports would make up for the differences. The position of both, one and both arrangements for healthcare professionals worldwide, is that HCQ has shown no advantages in treatment, let alone in overcoming the dangers of its use. (And no, there are a thousand bill portals to pay the billions needed to corrupt one of those arrangements, even though doctors would accept bribes to let their circle of family, members and friends die without a remedy that is intended to be effective)
Unfortunately, some in experiments in which large doses of zinc-free HCQ were administered in complex stages of infection, as if seeking to cause experiments to fail.
It’s a myth, spread across other people who make money through fraudulent remedies and benefit from tricking other people into distrusting science that proves they’re thieves. Again, the last time you said that these “experiments” were being studied through “megadosis” of criminals, you gave as an example perfectly valid studies, conducted at serum rates comparable to those of patients with other diseases that respond to HCQ and that allegedly no studies of criminals have not even been investigated.
You would possibly accept as true those sites where they have videos to manipulate other people instead of the number one resources you might not perceive at all.
Does Japan buy 120m doses mean that if we don’t take it, we’re going to be in jail?
Will the military be in law enforcement?
Does Japan buy 120m doses mean that if we don’t take it, we’re going to be in jail?
Will the army be in law enforcement?
Yes, of course, since it happens all the time.
Speaking of Covid-19, here’s a fitness message:
https://twitter. com/maxbrooksauthor/status/1318930412610211841?ref_src-twsrc-tfw-twcamp-tweetembed-twterm-13189304126161841embed-twterm-1318930412610211841-twgr-tfw412-twcamp-on, ont, ont
Boy, a lot of them in wheelchairs ring here.
simply take your own resolution on the recommendation of genuine doctors.
I don’t want to waste any more time than that.
Apologies for being one of the couch doctors here. After seeing virusrex push the “pharmacy” can not hurt with its safe “vaccines” and all disorders as if they were minimalArray. . we just had to start publishing more data so others can just make a decision for themselves. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was paid through the pharmacy to “calm considerations about vaccines” and boost its additional narrative across multiple forums/sites.
The National Childhood Vaccine Injuries Act of 1986 is what I consider most to Americans.
“Americans who experience adverse reactions to the coronavirus vaccines that the United States is going to expand will find it difficult to be compensated for drug-related injuries.
This is because pandemic vaccine claims will target a federal program rarely used to inspire drug brands to help combat public fitness emergencies. Guarantee the investment to do so. “
“The link between vaccine and autism has not been discredited. And why would we want an injury fund if vaccines are safe?Maria Answer: They’re not. “
Since its launch in 2009, the program has distributed less than $6 million and has not yet earned US government investment. U. S. Committed to Covid-19″. – Basically Vaccine for COVID-19.
We listen to “Science in Institutions” and are no longer allowed to consult the type of vaccines. “Informed consent” rarely exists now in doctors because they are not aware of the ingredients/possible risks/adverse occasions of each injection or even in fact they grow weakened viruses (depending on the vaccine) in chickens, mice, aborted fetus tissues and even insect cells, then injects them saying they are entirely and if you dare to ask that you are classified as charlatan or antivax. Hmmm. . . anything has been derailed here.
No vaccine on the CDC’s vaccination schedule has been the subject of “double-blind, placebo-randomized” studies. Because of the Vaccines Act of 1986, vaccine brands cannot be sued for vaccine damage, but they lose demands for drugs that are manufactured, tested and approved by the FDA. Why give them unproven vaccines?
The dangers of vaccines are very genuine and parents cannot protect their safety.
Apologies for being one of the couch doctors here. After seeing virusrex push the “pharma” can not hurt with their safe “vaccines” and have explained all the disorders as if they were minimalArray. . we just had to start publishing more data so others could do it alone on their own. I wouldn’t be surprised if it was paid through the pharmacy to “calm considerations about vaccines” and boost its additional narrative across multiple forums/sites.
Apologies would be better suited to repeating false data even if you have already been informed that they are false, this is a much more urgent factor with the comments.
Of course, the pharmacist can do harm, it’s very different from your message dealing with the pharmacist can’t do anything good, and it’s already done long-term damage because you draw conclusions in the absence of data. It’s just a mistake.
“Americans who experience adverse reactions to the coronavirus vaccines that the United States is going to expand will find it difficult to be compensated for drug-related injuries.
You’ve already been corrected on this, anyone who suspects an adverse reaction won’t even want to turn out to be, only that it’s imaginable to do so, it’s much easier and easier, it’s a commitment to pay for the imaginable damages rather than other people checking what is sometimes unimaginable, so not only do they not receive compensation, but they would also have to pay legal fees in case of bankruptcy.
This is because pandemic vaccine claims will target a federal program rarely used to inspire drug brands to help combat public fitness emergencies. Guarantee the investment to do so. “
Again, repeat anything you know to be false, “rarely” is used since you yourself said billions were paid, contradicts what you yourself said.
And no, companies do not forgive, they have full responsibility, as evidenced by the constant vigilance and corroboration that government laboratories do to verify that vaccines are as safe and effective as intended. , because they no longer have to fight companies, as long as their call is not obviously impossible, they get compensation.
I know it completely destroys this false point, but no matter how much you forget this open truth, I can write it as many times as you want.
“The link between vaccine and autism has not been discredited. And why would we want an injury fund if vaccines are safe?Maria Answer: They’re not. “
Falsely, autism has already been discredited through science as a result of vaccination, ultimately without a realistic chance of getting it wrong. Only other people who actively deny science are still connected. own vaccines like Wakefield, hero of the antivaxxers even though he took the credit of miners for unethical experiments.
Do we hear “Science in Institutions” and you are no longer allowed to protect vaccines?
Use lies shown? Of course not, he’s never been allowed to use lies at all.
True professionals constantly consult vaccine protection and try it; antivaxizers, on the other hand, only repeat things that they already know to be false just to share their mistakes with other people, which is not valid, neither for vaccines nor for anything else.
“Informed consent” rarely exists now in doctors because they are unaware of the ingredients/possible risks/adverse occasions in each injection or even the fact that they develop weakened viruses (according to the vaccine) in chickens, mice and tissues of aborted fetuses. and even insect cells, then inject them by saying they’re entirely and if you dare ask that you’re classified as charlatan or antivax. Hmmm. . . everything has been derailed here.
It is not perceived what informed consent means, doctors could forget all this (they do not) and it would be informed consent as long as the patient is informed of everything important.
But it’s a moot point, doctors never say “it’s completely safe” that only an anti-anthists who have never taken a vaccine can repeat this apparent lie. What doctors say (and this is perfectly valid) is that the vaccine is much safer than infection, and they’re right.
No CDC vaccine has undergone “randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled” studies.
When they develop, of course, they do, but those who already decided to be safer than infection through long-term studies deserve NOT to be placeboed, which is unethical, as unethical as doing a placebo trial of antibiotics. for acute sepsis There is an apparent advantage. Antivaxxers call for a highly unlikely popular who would cause unnecessary illness and death just to produce what is already known.
Because of the Vaccines Act of 1986, vaccine brands cannot be sued for vaccine damage, however, they lose demands for drugs they manufacture, which are tested and approved through the FDA. Why do they deserve to give them vaccines that aren’t tested?
Because it is in the public’s most productive interest to have effective intervention and conditioning, therefore, they propose vaccines, so it is the government that assumes the role of ensuring that they remain and are effective and absorb people’s claims that they are suspicious. Damage Everything to everyone’s smarts. People who refuse to be treated for imaginary threats are sometimes not a threat to others, so the government does not verify or corroborate prescription drugs as strongly as vaccines, so it is the duty of companies, if no one needs to use them, they may decide to jeopardize their own physical form and that will be it.
Unfortunately, some in experiments in which large doses of zinc-free HCQ were administered in complex stages of infection, as if seeking to cause experiments to fail.
It is a myth, spread through other people who make effective through fraudulent remedies and who benefit from tricking other people into distrusting the science that proves they are criminals. “megadosis” of criminals, you gave as an example perfectly valid studies, conducted at serum rates comparable to those of patients with other diseases that respond to HCQ and did not even investigate allegedly criminal studies.
You talked about the HCQ test survey, I just commented that the test to be studied is the one that used large doses of HCQ, much higher than the maximum recommended dose for HCQ. You responded by saying that dosages were typical and based on dosage. HCQ used to treat some other disease.
Well, France Soir (FS) interviewed Professor Martin Landray (ML), one of the researchers in the Oxford Recovery trials.
FS: “How did you take the dose of hydroxychloroquine?”
ML: “Dosages were selected on the basis of the pharmacokinetic model and correspond to the type of dose you have used for other diseases, such as amebian dysentery. “(very much to your answer)
FS: “Is there a dose of HCQ in the UK?”
ML: “I would have to check that it is still much higher than 2400 mg, about six or ten times more . . . The dose of HCQ used is nothing more than that used, as I said, for example in amebian dysentery.
(according to the British National Form, the dose is around 400 mg, for a person of 70 kg)
FS then interviewed Dr. Christian Perronne (professor of infectious and tropical diseases) who:
“This is the first time we have used hydroxychloroquine in amoebic dysentery, in addition to the super toxic dose for humans.
“The classic remedy for cholera amebiasis is based on a mixture of hydroxycinoleins, tiliquinol and tilbroquinol, whose industrial name is Intetrix. “
“I think they contain hydroxychloroquine with hydroxychynoteins. “
“If my speculation is correct, it is incompetence. Maximum severity is the use of a huge and deadly dose,” Professor Perronne added.
I know that at all times you boast your unique ability to read the number one sources, however, it turns out that you and Professor Landray have hydroxychloroquine with hydroxyquinolein!
Yes, when I mentioned:
“I’ve heard of a malpractice test, but it’s the test that showed hydroxychloroquine is dead for Covid-19 and is potentially toxic. They used hydroxychloroquine concentrations up to 20 times the upper limit. The same review that was consistently used through HSH to criticize Trump. “
I mean a published article that you deleted.
The other segment I lifted was not eliminated; they just finished the exam themselves. I think the excuse they gave was that they had concluded that HCQ was not effective and that patients had died. I suspect he was arrested when someone in his organization found out that they had hydroxychloroquine with hydroxycinoleins and that the doses of hydroxychloroquine they were being given were too high, even though you insisted that the doses were appropriate and accused me of not reading the document correctly.
The other segment I picked up was not deleted; they just finished the exam themselves. I think the excuse they gave was that they had concluded that the HCQ was not effective and that the patients had died. I suspect you were detained when someone in your organization found out that they had hydroxychloroquine with hydroxycinoleins and that the doses of hydroxychloroquine they were being given were too high, even though you insisted that the doses were correct and accused me of not reading the document correctly.
There is no such study, ever. I have already brought the studies you referred to (using precisely the links you provided) and my own quote on dosages.
Interestingly, many experts criticize the British test for too high doses of HCQ, for not treating patients at an initial level, and for not adding zinc.
You claim the doses weren’t that high. So how do you do the interview with France Soir (FS) through Professor Martin Landray (ML), one of the leading researchers in the Oxford Recovery trials?
FS: “Is there a dose of HCQ in the UK?”(according to the British National Formulary, the dose is approximately 400 mg, for a 70 kg user)
ML: “I would have to check that it is still much higher than 2400 mg, about six or ten times more . . . The dose of HCQ used is nothing more than that used, as I said, for example in amebian dysentery.
And then there’s Dr. John Campbell, who evidently shows how British researchers used inexplicably high doses of HCQ. Hmmm, who deserve to list all the experts who point out inexplicably high doses of HCQ on British tests, or deserve virusrex, which he pressed for “safe and effective” vaccines?
The fact is that low doses of HCQ with zinc (and azithromycin) when administered in the early stages are very effective and render a hasty vaccine useless.
Tokyo-Engr
I am not aware of the side effects of quinoa, however, HCQ is safe at the recommended dosage. The short term deserves to be okay.
Did you feel the side effects immediately or after 3 weeks?
What you’re doing sounds good. I think my nutrition contains enough zinc, but I also take a zinc supplement. And now that summer is over, I’m also taking a vitamin D supplement; I highly propose.
I think what we’re doing is helpful in preventing Covid-19 headaches, but like you said, even if we don’t, it makes us healthier.
It would be wonderful if I could take HCQ, to take each and every time I feel bad. Since this is unfortunately not possible, I am now contemplating buying Amazon’s quercetin; other people recommend that it look a bit like HCQ.