L / RAIN
Most U. S. states have been able to do so. But it’s not the first time They have rejected the Trump administration’s new COVID-19 verification rules in an ordinary rebuke from the country’s most sensible disease prevention agency, according to officials from public fitness agencies and revised public statements through Reuters.
At least 33 states continue to propose testing to others who have been exposed to COVID-19 and have no symptoms, rejecting the rules published this week through the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). But it’s not the first time That the evidence would possibly be innecesarias. no responded to requests for comment and North Dakota said it had not made a decision.
States that break up with the federal government come with conservatives Texas, Oklahoma, and Arizona.
Public fitness experts have said a rupture of this magnitude with the CDC may be unprecedented and reflect a growing mistrust of the Trump administration and its reaction to the pandemic.
“These are states that almost all oppose the new guidelines,” said Michael Mina, assistant professor of epidemiology at Harvard’s TH Chan School of Public Health.
The CDC said Monday that others exposed to COVID-19 but who have no symptoms “don’t necessarily want a check unless a vulnerable user or their fitness provider or state or local government or public fitness provider introduces you to take one. “
In the past, the CDC tested all Americans who had close contact with a user diagnosed with COVID-19. This remains the policy of at least 30 states. Some who have not replaced the policy have said they are reading THE CDC guidelines.
A spokeswoman for the CDC’s Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said the new rules don’t discourage other asymptomatic people from getting tested.
She said the officials who broke with the administration “misunderstood the rules. THE CC rules state that “the resolution to be tested will have to be made in collaboration with public fitness officials or your individual case-based fitness service provider and the state of community spread. “
Some heads of state and public fitness experts accuse the administration of using politics instead of science to advise their reaction to the pandemic.
“This 180-degree reversal of COVID-19 verification rules is reckless and science-like and has the potential to damage the long-term reputation (CDC), New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said, and the governors of New Jersey and Connecticut said in a statement, rejecting the new CDC rules.
Admiral Brett Giroir, undersecretary of fitness at HHS, said there is no political tension on the part of the administration, and that testing asymptomatic patients too soon can produce false negatives and contribute to the spread of the virus.
“There’s no point in getting tested five to seven days (after infection) because it’s not going to test positive,” said David Battinelli, Northwell Health’s medical director, acknowledging test considerations too soon. “There’s a lot of evidence going on. “
Idaho recommends that others exposed to COVID-19 contact your doctor if they want to get tested. This was one of the states that did not respond to a request for feedback on CDC guidelines.
Public aptitude officials who are the United States and the United States have not been able to do so. But it’s not the first time You want to verify more frequently that it is very important to locate asymptomatic COVID-19 carriers to decrease propagation and that CDC comments may discourage mandatory verification.
Even before CDC guidelines, the number of coronavirus tests performed decreased. The United States assessed an average of another 675,000 people per day last week, facing the peak of more than 800,000 people per day at the end of July.
Nationally, cases have declined for five consecutive weeks, however, infections are emerging in the Midwest of the US. U. S. , with four states reporting a record day of accumulation on Thursday, while the death toll in the United States increased above 180,000.
Since the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis, the Japan Times has provided free access to very important data on the effect of the new coronavirus, as well as practical data on how to deal with the pandemic. today so that we can continue to provide you with up-to-date and detailed data on Japan.
The Japan Times LTD. All rights are reserved.