The Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday centered on how former Attorney General Eric Schmitt treated a case that declared local fitness authorities’ efforts to mitigate COVID-19 in 2021 “null and void. “
Attorney Neal Perryman represented two counties and three gyms that argued Wednesday that they were able to interfere in the original Cole County case after the attorney general refused to appeal.
Assistant Attorney General Maria Lanahan disagreed, saying local government agencies interfere after the trial and have no vested interest in the original case.
“(Appellants) have no right to come and review to bring the attorney general’s task to what is in the interest of the state,” Lanahan told the court.
Perryman said the county was created, through state law, to participate in fitness orders, but lost that force through Cole County’s initial decision.
“We have lost a significant component of our force to give orders,” he said. “We can’t do what we could do before. “
In November 2021, Cole County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Green said the local government’s COVID-19 arrest warrants violated the Missouri Constitution.
Perryman said Wednesday that the judge’s ruling came here “out of nowhere” and that local officials were “confident, in abstract trial documents, that there would be an appeal. “
But as the Department of Health and Senior Services sought to appeal the case, Schmitt, who resigned as attorney general last year to serve in the U. S. Senate, refused.
Chuck Hatfield, who served in the attorney general’s office under Democrat Jay Nixon, has told The Independent in the past that it is “extremely unusual” for the attorney general’s office to oppose a client’s order.
After Schmitt announced she would appeal the decision, Melanie Hutton, administrator of the St. County Public Health Center. Louis, Jackson County, Cooper County, the Livingston County Health Center Board of Directors and the Jefferson County Health Center Board of Directors attempted to take the case. In their hands and away from the Attorney General’s Office.
But Green allowed them to register a move for a new trial or appeal the sentence.
The factor has now figured its way to the Missouri Supreme Court, which will determine whether counties have the right to intervene.
Fifteen days after Judge Green struck down local COVID orders as unconstitutional, Schmitt sent threatening letters to districts and local public fitness agencies ordering them to halt all COVID mitigation policies.
“All mask orders, quarantine orders, and other public fitness orders that are based on any of the regulations invalidated or issued outside the protections of the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act are null and void,” the letter said.
In court Wednesday and in his 67-page filing, local government agencies seeking to interfere in the case argued that by filing an appeal, Schmitt “immediately put together judgment opposing local governments and schools across the state. “
In May, a Jackson County ruling ruled that Schmitt did not have the authority to tell school districts to end mask orders. Perryman said Jackson County’s ruling describes the “chaos caused in the state” after Judge Green struck down local fitness orders.
Cole County’s resolution dragged on beyond COVID-19, and local fitness officials questioned whether it undermined their authority to deal with other potential public fitness issues, such as RSV outbreaks.
Perryman said the state was unclear.
The judges’ questions Wednesday morning focused on the procedure allowed for intervention after sentencing. Generally, the parties register a case before a decision is rendered.
Perryman told the court that the counties had no explanation for interfering until Schmitt declined to appeal.
Mathis responded that “motions to interfere are posttrial motions. “
Judge Patricia Breckenridge, who asked most of the questions Wednesday, asked whether “substantive justice” replaced the procedure. Substantive justice refers to the fairness of a case; Sometimes, judges will take into account your procedural needs to ensure what they see as a fair trial.
Mathis said that really extensive justice is not something that is discovered for post-trial intervention in this court.
“How did the court deal with a case like this where the state was not adequately protecting the state?” asked Breckenridge, saying the attorney general’s workplace had “ambiguously defended” DHSS rules.
Breckenridge also stated the widespread effect of the case and asked Perryman if there was any other way to argue against Green’s decision.
“So if you can’t intervene,” he said, “there’s no way to negate the effect on everyone who is rarely a major part of the lawsuit as far as the effect of trying this case. “
Perryman said the features would be very limited or nonexistent since the center of the case is no longer in place.
Get the morning headlines in your inbox
by Annelise Hanshaw, Missouri Independent July 12, 2023
The Missouri Supreme Court heard arguments Wednesday focused on how former Attorney General Eric Schmitt treated a case that declared local fitness authorities’ efforts to mitigate COVID-19 in 2021 “null and void. “
Attorney Neal Perryman represented two counties and three gyms that argued Wednesday that they were able to interfere in the original Cole County case after the attorney general refused to appeal.
Assistant Attorney General Maria Lanahan disagreed, saying local government agencies interfere after the trial and have no vested interest in the original case.
“(Appellants) have no right to come and review to bring the attorney general’s task to what is in the interest of the state,” Lanahan told the court.
Perryman said the county was created, through state law, to participate in fitness orders, but lost that force through Cole County’s initial decision.
“We have lost a significant component of our force to give orders,” he said. “We can’t do what we could do before. “
In November 2021, Cole County Circuit Court Judge Daniel Green said the local government’s COVID-19 arrest warrants violated the Missouri Constitution.
Perryman said Wednesday that the judge’s ruling came here “out of nowhere” and that local officials were “confident, in abstract trial documents, that there would be an appeal. “
But as the Department of Health and Senior Services sought to appeal the case, Schmitt, who resigned as attorney general last year to serve in the U. S. Senate, refused.
Chuck Hatfield, who served in the attorney general’s office under Democrat Jay Nixon, has told The Independent in the past that it is “extremely unusual” for the attorney general’s office to oppose a client’s order.
After Schmitt announced she would appeal the decision, Melanie Hutton, administrator of the St. County Public Health Center. Louis, Jackson County, Cooper County, the Livingston County Health Center Board of Directors and the Jefferson County Health Center Board of Directors attempted to take the case. In their hands and away from the Attorney General’s Office.
But Green allowed them to register a move for a new trial or appeal the sentence.
The factor has now figured its way to the Missouri Supreme Court, which will determine whether counties have the right to intervene.
Fifteen days after Judge Green struck down local COVID orders as unconstitutional, Schmitt sent threatening letters to districts and local public fitness agencies ordering them to halt all COVID mitigation policies.
“All mask orders, quarantine orders, and other public fitness orders that are based on any of the regulations invalidated or issued outside the protections of the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act are null and void,” the letter said.
In court Wednesday and in his 67-page filing, local government agencies seeking to interfere in the case argued that by filing an appeal, Schmitt “immediately put together judgment opposing local governments and schools across the state. “
In May, a Jackson County ruling ruled that Schmitt did not have the authority to tell school districts to end mask orders. Perryman said Jackson County’s ruling describes the “chaos caused in the state” after Judge Green struck down local fitness orders.
Cole County’s resolution dragged on beyond COVID-19, and local fitness officials questioned whether it undermined their authority to deal with other potential public fitness issues, such as RSV outbreaks.
Perryman said the state was unclear.
The judges’ questions Wednesday morning focused on the procedure allowed for intervention after sentencing. Generally, the parties register a case before a decision is rendered.
Perryman told the court that the counties had no explanation for interfering until Schmitt declined to appeal.
Mathis responded that “motions to interfere are posttrial motions. “
Judge Patricia Breckenridge, who asked most of the questions Wednesday, asked whether “substantive justice” replaced the procedure. Substantive justice refers to the fairness of a case; Sometimes, judges will take into account your procedural needs to ensure what they see as a fair trial.
Mathis said that really extensive justice is not something that is discovered for post-trial intervention in this court.
“How did the court deal with a case like this where the state was not adequately protecting the state?” asked Breckenridge, saying the attorney general’s workplace had “ambiguously defended” DHSS rules.
Breckenridge also stated the widespread effect of the case and asked Perryman if there was any other way to argue against Green’s decision.
“So if you can’t intervene,” he said, “there’s no way to negate the effect on everyone who is rarely a major part of the lawsuit as far as the effect of trying this case. “
Perryman said the features would be very limited or nonexistent since the center of the case is no longer in place.
Get the morning headlines in your inbox
Missouri Independent is owned by States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported through grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Please contact editor Jason Hancock if you have any questions: info@missouriindependent. com. Follow the Missouri Independent on Facebook and Twitter.
Annelise Hanshaw writes about schooling, a rhythm she has covered on the East and West coasts while appearing for newspapers in Santa Barbara, California, and Greenwich, Connecticut. Born and raised in Missouri, she is proud to be back in her native country.
DEMOCRACY TOOLBOX
The Missouri Independent is a nonpartisan, nonprofit news organization committed to relentless investigative journalism and daily reporting that sheds light on state government and impacts the lives of Missourians. This service is available to readers and other media.
Our stories can be republished online or published under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4. 0 license. We ask that you modify them to suit taste or shorten them, provide proper attribution and a link to our website.