Never, not even in its wildest dreams, has the U. S. government failed to carry out its wildest dreams. The US has done as much damage to China as Xi did with his crackdown on communist purity and his Covid Zero policy. I wonder if Washington has replaced it with something similar.
China is the latest major economy to be welded into a COVID-zero strategy: exposing businesses and staff to the threat of instant lockdowns, freezing activity in the service sector, and counting chains of origin for factories to sell their products.
The United States and other countries are also suffering from the disruption of the chain.
But China’s GDP is expected to be at least the same as the UK’s this year in terms of growth.
And while businesses and staff are at risk of instant closures, they’re less likely to catch Covif than their Western counterparts, so being alive and healthy as a side effect is rarely such a bad thing.
What the world has learned depends on the chain of origin of a single country.
For any foreign company that thinks it has a long-term strategy in China, seriously reconsider things.
I didn’t expect covid, but I said it about 10 years ago and no one took me seriously. Yes, schadenfreude!
And while businesses and staff are at risk of instant closures, they’re less likely to catch Covif than their Western counterparts, so being alive and healthy as a side effect is rarely such a bad thing.
Given that other countries have or even reduce covid death rates without the need to apply lockdowns, this argument still sounds false, so no foreign expert recommends the 0 covid policy this year.
Another negative effect is that the 0 covid policy motivates deaths on its own, which means that in order to succeed to the same degrees as countries that have a low death rate, China chooses to let other people in poor health die, which completely nullifies the goal. , considering the ruin and economic destruction caused to countless families at the site of the closures, it is clear that this is not a winning proposal, but quite the opposite.
Given that other countries have or even reduce covid death rates without the need to apply lockdowns, this argument still sounds false, so no foreign expert recommends the 0 covid policy this year.
False, because all other countries have higher mortality rates, according to statistical data.
You should also state bluntly that no foreign expert recommends a 0 covid policy this year, just as Ma Xiaowei, a foreign expert, recommends 0 covid this year.
Another negative effect is that the 0 covid policy motivates deaths on its own, which means that in order to succeed to the same degrees as countries that have a low death rate, China chooses to let other people in poor health die, which completely nullifies the goal. , considering the ruin and economic destruction caused to countless families at the site of the closures, it is clear that this is not a winning proposal, but quite the opposite.
False hypothesis with no verifiable source to such a “claim”. It is ridiculous to think that a 0 covid policy would cause 1 million deaths as is the case in the United States.
And it provides no source of economic destruction. In reality, China is the only country that has a positive economic expansion in the crisis, it is well known.
False, because all other countries have higher mortality rates, according to statistical data.
And again, you blind the CCP’s data.
Because other wise people in the CCP’s data, don’t they?
False, because all other countries have higher mortality rates, according to statistical data.
All the resources you brought say that China has higher mortality rates than other countries, and once the report is done the same way, there are dozens with higher numbers. Why do you feel the desire to repeat something that you yourself have proven to be wrong?
False hypothesis with no verifiable source to such a “claim”. It is ridiculous to think that a 0 covid policy would cause 1 million deaths as is the case in the United States.
This has been widely reported included on this site, there is nothing ridiculous about it, the 0 covid policy makes other people unemployed and without hospitals and causes deaths on its own.
And you provide any source of economic destruction.
Countless articles have explained in detail the economic destruction caused at every place of an epidemic, with Shanghai as the biggest example, the Chinese economy is slowing down because of this, no rational one would think that anything that causes ruin makes things better for the country.
All the resources you brought say that China has higher mortality rates than other countries, and once the report is done the same way, there are dozens with higher numbers. Why do you feel the desire to repeat something that you yourself have proven to be wrong?
If you think Antarctica is an uncontrolled country, discover one with a lower mortality rate than China. Otherwise, statistical data shows that China has the lowest covid infection and death rate in the world, no matter how many times you and other Holocaust deniers review forgetting a basic fact. I guess since they also promoted herbal immunity over the vaccine, he has no problem denying the science and facts.
https://www. bbc. com/news/world-51235105
This has been widely reported included on this site, there is nothing ridiculous about it, the 0 covid policy makes other people unemployed and without hospitals and causes deaths on its own.
No scientist or medical professional (which you are not) says that China’s 0 covid policy will result in more deaths for reasons other than covid, than covid-related deaths. What a silly idea.
Countless articles have explained in detail the economic destruction caused at every place of an epidemic, with Shanghai as the biggest example, the Chinese economy is slowing down because of this, no rational one would think that anything that causes ruin makes things better for the country.
And you provide such items.
But if the Chinese economy is destroyed, then the economies with the lowest growth, such as the United Kingdom, Japan, the United States and others, will have to devastate their economies beyond the recovery.
If you think Antarctica is a country, then discover one with a lower mortality rate than China.
Antarctica is the only country that has a lower death rate than China, and again, adapting to the same way China uses to hide deaths, dozens of other countries are doing better.
Yours obviously proves this.
No scientist or medical professional (which you are not) says that China’s 0 covid policy will result in more deaths for reasons other than covid, than covid-related deaths. What a silly idea.
Since you probably have no idea what the other commentators are or aren’t, your argument is unfounded, insisting on being able to guess things only shows the desperation of not having an argument that can protect what you believe.
And you provide such items.
At this point, pretending not to know that Shanghai has experienced a massive economic crisis is more than credible, each and every one of the articles written lately about Shanghai talk about it.
Antarctica is the only country that has a lower death rate than China, and again, adapting to the same way China uses to hide deaths, dozens of other countries are doing better.
You misunderstand the fundamental geographical concept of Antarctica, which is a country. And just for consistency, neither does Diamond Princess.
*Antarctica** is the southernmost continent on Earth. *
https://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Antártida
Since you probably have no idea what the other commentators are or aren’t, your argument is unfounded, insisting on being able to guess things only shows the desperation of not having an argument that can protect what you believe.
No one guesses; is pretending
At this point, pretending not to know that Shanghai has experienced a massive economic crisis is more than credible, each and every one of the articles written lately about Shanghai talk about it.
Shanghai’s economy is developing more than that of the UNITED Kingdom, the United States, Japan and New Zealand, which went into recession and then defected 0 covid, is seeing its economy decimated, with a negative expansion of 0. 20 in the last quarter.
The economy sequentially in the first quarter of this year.
https://www. focus-economics. com/countries/nueva-zelanda
You misunderstand the fundamental geographical concept of Antarctica, which is a country. And just for consistency, neither does Diamond Princess.
and they are the only ones that make China ninth, which further proves that their comment is incorrect.
No one guesses; is pretending
It is the same, you can pretend to know things from other commentators of which you have no concept, it is an unfounded hypothesis and has no value.
Shanghai’s economy is developing more than that of the UNITED Kingdom, the United States, Japan and New Zealand, which went into recession and then defected 0 covid, is seeing its economy decimated, with a negative expansion of 0. 20 in the last quarter.
Why just mention the things that happened before the shutdown?Shanghai needed China to push, which is not the case for a developing economy.