A doctor in Gaza City uses a child’s temperature device for coronavirus.
With an additional increase in the number of coronavirus infections, Gaza once again confronts the very genuine prospect of its fitness formula being overwhelmed.
Gaza is not only fighting a global pandemic. Under Israeli blockade and successive army attacks since 2007, the coastal strip is fighting one of the world’s poverty and unemployment levels, as well as a ruined infrastructure, adding in its fitness sector.
A severe shortage of medicines and medical devices connected to Israeli headquarters could, combined with the havoc of a pandemic, threaten the fitness service with total collapse.
At least one of these things can be temporarily corrected if Israel relieves or terminates its blockade.
But emphasizing this is not as undeniable as it might seem, as 4 fitness and human rights professionals around the world have discovered to the end.
In March, when the pandemic first hit Gaza, David Mills of Boston Children’s Hospital, Bram Wispelwey of Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston, Rania Muhareb, before the Palestinian Al-Haq on human rights, and Mads Gilbert of Northern Norway University Hospital, wrote a brief letter to The Lancet, one of the world’s leading medical journals.
Pandemics will do more harm to “populations burdened by poverty, army occupation, discrimination and institutionalized oppression,” the authors stressed. They suggested that the foreign network act to end the “structural violence” inflicted on Palestinians in Gaza.
“A COVID-19 pandemic that further paralyzes the fitness formula in the Gaza Strip will not be seen as an inevitable biomedical phenomenon experienced by the world’s population, but as an avoidable biosocial injustice rooted in decades of Israeli oppression and foreign complicity,” they concluded.
The letter – “Structural violence in the era of a new pandemic: the case of the Gaza Strip” – duly published online on 27 March.
However, three days later, in a movement, if not unprecedented, for The Lancet, the letter was withdrawn without comment (it can still be read, on an educational publication search engine site, here).
“Once we realized, we contacted The Lancet for an explanation,” said Wispelwey, who is an instructor at Harvard Medical School.
According to Wispelwey, The Lancet would say that “our comment caused a serious crisis” but did not present details, no other comments and no published explanation for readers.
The authors noted that the letter caused a stir among Israel’s supporters in the medical community.
Prominent activist Daniel Drucker, a Canadian endocrinologist, headed to Twitter on March 29 to criticize The Lancet and its editor-in-chief, Richard Horton.
“As the global fight against COVID-19,” he writes, The Lancet and Richard Horton “take the opportunity” to publish letters “denigrating Israel. “
In a blog post, Drucker praised Horton for his “quick decision” to the letter to “blame Israel” for The Lancet.
This attracted a quick reaction from Palestine Legal, lamenting that Drucker had forced The Lancet to censor himself.
Drucker also anti-Semitism to a virus, saying that “anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism and anti-Somali invective are very similar strains. “
Drucker is not new to this kind of pro-Israel defense. It is a component of a highly effective crusade opposed to The Lancet in 2014, after the publication published “An Open Letter to the People of Gaza” protesting the effects of the Israeli army attack year.
The attack killed more than 2,200 people, most of them civilians, adding up to 550 children.
By the end of July 2014, and amid the Israeli offensive, the letter had won more than 20,000 signatures, which The Lancet had announced would be published after “several threatening statements opposed to those signatories. “
Among the threatening statements, it was later revealed, there were private attacks on Horton accusing him of anti-Semitism and retracting him in a Nazi uniform. His wife verbally assaulted and his classmates told his daughter that his father was anti-Semitic.
In reaction to this letter, Drucker requested to keep medical and clinical publications “free from divergent political opinions. “
The petition attracted more than 5,000 signatures and prompted pro-Israeli fitness professionals around the world, but especially in North America, to boycott The Lancet for five years.
Finally, and after The Lancet in 2017 faithful a factor to the Israeli fitness system, the boycott was cancelled.
But the truth, Wispelwey said, is that medical journals will now be subjected to indirect censorship or self-censorship over Palestine due to the “global deterrent effect” of the crusade opposed to The Lancet.
The comment he co-wrote in March, according to Wispelwey, was not more obviously worded than articles published elsewhere in the main Israeli media.
“The excessive reaction suggests that this is an area – educational medical journals – that is prohibited even for ideas, documentation and discourse on the Palestinian fitness context involving criticism of Israel,” Wispelwey said.
The Electronic Intifada reported in March that the control panel widely used for COVID-19 through Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Systems Science and Engineering had erased the Palestinians by merging knowledge of Israel and the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
This resolution was eventually reversed, but the silence of pro-Palestinian voices in academia and beyond has been well documented across everyone from Edward Said to Judith Butler.
It’s an effort, that little sign of slowdown.
Last month, major social media – Zoom, Facebook and YouTube – ended an occasion organized through San Francisco State University with Leila Khaled, a Palestinian resistance icon and former combatant of the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine, now in his 1970s.
And around the world, pro-Israel teams are pressuring governments to the full degrees to ban the movement of boycott, disinversion and sanctions, which they describe as anti-Semitic.
The argument for silencing the Israeli remedy complaint to Palestinians in medical and clinical publications is that they deserve to be devoid of “divisive” political content.
But this, Rania Muhareb, a legal and educational researcher in Al-Haq, said in writing the March letter, is sincere.
Public aptitude issues are clearly political (universal aptitude care is a transparent example) and social and political inequalities are identified as the root causes of poor aptitude. In conflict zones, they must be separated.
“The realization of the right to physical fitness is strongly related to the realization of basic rights,” Muhareb told The Electronic Intifada.
In Gaza, fitness policy is at stake.
With all imports complete into Gaza, adding humanitarian aid, the Israeli military has been unable to identify an emergency plan for Gaza as the impoverished region tries to cope with COVID-19.
Israel refuses to act despite the fact that it remains the occupying force under foreign law and is legally guilty for the basic well-being of all in Gaza.
And it’s not for lack of notice. Palestinian, Israeli and foreign human rights teams have called on Israel to formulate a plan or, more effectively, to fully lift the siege before it is too late.
The figures tell a disturbing story: when the pandemic first hit Gaza in March, it was limited to the few travelers entering and leaving the besieged coastal strip.
They were easy to identify and quarantine.
The first COVID-19-related death occurred in May, approximately two months after the first cases were shown, and also in an isolation facility.
But once network transmission began in late August, numbers increased.
The instances shown went from two hundred at the end of August to more than 2,600 to 25 September, with 17 dead.
“The fitness formula in Gaza has reached the point of collapse,” said Mads Gilbert, a surgeon who worked for many years in Gaza.
The Israeli blockade and repeated army attacks have fatally undermined the provision of fitness services in Gaza, he said, and left hospitals and clinics without the capacity or preparedness to face a pandemic.
“The concern is that an out-of-control outbreak of COVID-19 in the Gaza Strip will absolutely overwhelm Gaza’s fitness system, exacerbating the Palestinians’ vulnerability to the pandemic in situations of structural violence,” Gilbert told The Electronic Intifada.
Just a comment for fitness professionals? Not according to Zion Hagay of the Israeli Medical Association, whose letter in reaction to the now non-existent letter written through Gilbert et al published in the most recent online edition of The Lancet.
Hagay denounced the March letter as “political rhetoric” and defended Israel’s blockade as “a reaction to arms smuggling and relentless violence against Israel. “
To Israel for “allowing” Palestinian patients to “continue to enter Israel for life-saving medical care.
But Palestinians in Gaza face an expensive and widely criticized procedure for obtaining israeli army permits to travel in search of repair or for any other reason.
Due to Israeli delays and denials of permits, Palestinian patients die from lack of treatment. 54 such deaths have been documented through WHO in 2017.
Hagay also did not note that UN Secretary-General Guterres, who also cites praise for cooperation between Israel and the Palestinian Authority in reaction to COVID-19, has long described Gaza as one of the most “dramatic” humanitarian crises in the world and called for the siege to be lifted.
But beyond that, Wispelwey said, it was “amazing” that The Lancet published a letter in reaction to an article that had already been deleted.
“This makes it the strangest thing, ” said Wispelwey. “Post a reaction to an article now” missing “and let you comment on its removal?”
“Censorship and surveillance are classic colonialist control strategies,” Wispelwey added.
Instead of pointing to a false “balance” of perspectives that ignores power differences, Wispelwey said, we will have to “begin to recognize, summon, and resist those forces in educational medicine and beyond. “
The Lancet declined to comment.
Omar Karmi is deputy editor of The Electronic Intifada and former editor in Jerusalem and Washington, D. C. , a correspondent for The National.
© 2000-2020 electronicIntifada. net