Joe Biden ‘probably violated the U. S. Constitution. ‘U. S. Treasury Ruling on Says While Generation Ban Is Pronounced

It is “likely” that Joe Biden’s management violated the First Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. The U. S. government government, reportedly according to a federal ruling, temporarily banned White House officials from meeting with tech corporations to talk about censorship on social media.

Louisiana Judge Terry A Doughty issued the injunction in reaction to recent lawsuits through the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri. The lawsuits claim that the White House has coerced or “significantly encouraged” tech corporations to clamp down on loose talk about the Covid1-9 pandemic.

Judge Doughty has now barred White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, some members of Biden’s cabinet, and other federal officials and agencies from contacting social media corporations to suppress speech. The lawsuit in particular named tech giants Google, Meta (Facebook) and Twitter.

Read more. . . Donald Trump ‘hurt’ by Twitter ban ahead of TRUTH Social launch

The injunction received through Fox News. He reportedly said the Biden administration’s moves “likely violate the lax speech clause” and that the court is “not convinced by the defendants’ arguments. “

In the injunction, Judge Doughty said, “During the COVID-19 pandemic, a very productive era characterized by widespread doubt and uncertainty, the U. S. government has not yet been able to do so. The US seems to have assumed a role similar to that of an Orwellian ‘Ministry of Truth’.

“If the plaintiffs’ allegations are true, this case is arguably the greatest attack on free speech in U. S. history.

“In their attempts to suppress the alleged misinformation, the federal government and the defendants named here have allegedly blatantly ignored the First Amendment right to free speech. “

Don’t miss. . . Russia ‘places explosives’ in NUCLEAR POWER PLANT in Putin’s maximum harmful maneuver

The injunction notes that the alleged censorship “targeted almost exclusively conservative discourse,” but says the issues raised through the case are “crossover. “

“Point of view discrimination is a blatant form of content discrimination,” Judge Doughty said. “The government will have to avoid regulating speech when the motivational ideology expresses or the point of view of the speaker is the justification for the restriction. “

Fox News said the Justice Department declined to comment on the subpoena and that the White House, Google, Meta and Twitter still responded to requests for comment.

We use your registration to provide content in a manner in which you have consented and in our understanding of you. This would possibly come with advertisements from us and third parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. More information

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *