Jerusalem Public Affairs Centre

Following the announcement of an agreement to identify diplomatic relations between Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Iran’s political and military leaders have strongly warned the UAE of the negative consequences if motions allow Israel to expand its influence and activities in the region. The “betrayal” that opposes other Palestinian people and opposes the Islamic claim of Jerusalem is the recurring theme of statements made through representatives of the Iranian regime. Iranian leaders are pushing for resistance from the resistance front in the region (including Palestinian terrorist organizations, pro-Iranian Shiite militias in Iraq, Hezbollah, the Houthi motion in Yemen, and Shiite opposition organizations in the Gulf countries). In this context, Iran and Turkey are competing for who will “condemn more powerful and be more active” as Turkey has also denounced the agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates.

At the same time, Iran fears the deepening and institutionalization of Israel’s economic activity in the United Arab Emirates. According to Tehran, Israel may use the United Arab Emirates as a springboard for its intelligence and security activities in the other aspect of the Persian Gulf, namely this time sensitive to Iran, which was subjected to fires and explosions in Iran-linked facilities. nuclear program. It should be noted that the delegations of Israel had already gone to the United Arab Emirates. Trade agreements have already been signed between the two countries to combat coronavirus. All these advances are causing fear in Tehran.

Moreover, Iran’s threatening tone aims to deter other Gulf countries, namely Oman, Bahrain, Qatar, and Saudi Arabia, who would possibly be encouraged by the UAE resolution and normalize relations with Israel as they approached the United States and knew President Trump. “Agreement of the Century” peace plan.

The heads of the Iranian army and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps are directly and bralably threatening the Gulf States and, in particular, the United Arab Emirates. The Chief of Staff of the Iranian Army warned: “The government of the United Arab Emirates will face the consequences of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat for his shameful actions.”

A dispatched through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps made it clear, and not for the first time, that after the signing of the agreement, “Crystal Palace residents in the Emirates will likely face many long-term risks due to the signing of the agreement with Israel.” It should be noted that in recent years, the Iranian-backed Houthi defense force in Yemen has introduced several cruise missiles to Abu Dhabi airport and critical infrastructure in the United Arab Emirates. In addition, the “know-how” for the manufacture of cruise missiles and ballistic missiles was provided through Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps. The United Arab Emirates plays a very important role in stabilizing the southern region of Yemen, although it has recently reduced its activities in the country.

Iranian President Hassan Rohani criticized the relationship between the United Arab Emirates and Israel and even threatened to take “several measures” if the situation continues. Rouhani said:

Unfortunately, the United Arab Emirates has made a big mistake, and we hope that the United Arab Emirates will rectify this error and recognize that this is a bad path that does not benefit either the most productive interests of the leaders or their security. We warn you that if you allow Israel to take hold in the region, we will be in contact with them and treat them differently. I urge you to be careful … The United Arab Emirates has miscalculated because it ensures security and stability by approaching the enemies of Islam and Iran.

Rohani explained the agreement as “a betrayal of the Palestinian cause, the Islamic country and Jerusalem (al-Quds)”. He said the deal coincided with Donald Trump’s election campaign. He added that the agreement was conducted through Trump’s management and not through Israel and the United Arab Emirates themselves. Rohani staff leader Mahmoud Vaezi described the UNITED Arab Emirates resolution as a “treacherous and divisive mistake that history will not forgive.”

One issued through Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps condemned, unsurprisingly, the normalization of relations between the United Arab Emirates and Israel and explained it as a “strategic error that would drive the destruction of the Zionist regime.” He is also under pressure that the agreement is the ultimate insaon against the Palestinian cause and Jerusalem. According to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, the peace agreement between Israel and the United Arab Emirates recognizes Israel well, weakens resistance, exposes the Palestinian cause, and promotes “the agreement of the century.”

The announcement states that the agreement is a “poisoned knife on the back of the Islamic nation.”

The threat

The United States and supporters of the despicable Abu Dhabi-Tel Aviv agreement from inside and outside the region will not only not satisfy the interests of the Zionist regime, but will also break the preference for creating a new Middle East, exposing the citizens of the Emirates, especially Crystal Palace citizens in the United Arab Emirates, to many risks in the future.

He concludes that, as a result of their betrayal of the Islamic nation, the leaders of the United Arab emirates will be increasingly hated and that “in the face of this humiliation, faster or later they will have to wait for a reaction from the local population and other Islamic nations, who will not allow the Palestinian cause to be suppressed through mental war and false photographs of the Zionist media.

The Chief of Staff of the Iranian Army condemned the normalization of relations between the United Arab Emirates and Israel and implicitly threatened the life of Emirati leader Muhammad bin Zayed. “The Palestinian factor is alive and dynamic, and it won’t be long before Muhammad bin Zayed faces the negative consequences of his shameful actions, such as those of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. He added that the Resistance camp would continue to serve as an advocate for the Islamic world, despite the toxic arrows that shot him across the United States, the Zionist regime, and a number of reactionary figures, the story will not be the betrayal of the oppressed Palestinian people.

Major General Mohsen Rezaee, former commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and now secretary of the Opportunity Discernment Council, said that over the past decade, Abu Dhabi had become a safe haven for Israel, which has established networks of espionage and intelligence. Mossad opposed the countries of the region. He added that the agreement “will not deter the faithful Arab and Muslim fighters, and will not betray the Palestinian people… Greater Palestine will soon be liberated from Jordan to the Mediterranean Sea thanks to the perseverance and patience of its fighters.” and residents. Fix while the story will be the unworthy, the ones who stab the country in the back.

Hossein Amir-Abdulaahian, special assistant to Ali Larijani, president of the Islamic parliament at foreign affairs rate, noted that the agreement is “against peace and security and serves to publicize the crimes of the Zionists.” [2] Abbas-Ali Kadkhodaei, undersecretary and spokesman for the Constitution Guardian Council, said the agreement is nothing less than the Emirates profession in exchange for the abolition of the West Bank annexation. He described the United Arab Emirates as the territory of Israel.

Ali Akbar Velayati, Iran’s senior adviser to the Supreme Leader for International Affairs, also called the deal “a betrayal of Islamic states and criminal negligence of the Palestinian cause.” From Ali Akbar’s point of view, this agreement will lead to the alienation and isolation of the United Arab Emirates from the Islamic States. Velayati suggested that Islamic States reject the resolution adopted through the United Arab Emirates and do everything imaginable to help the Palestinian people.

Iranian Chancellor Mohammad Javad Zarif, who made a stopover in Beirut following the disastrous bombing of the port, showed in a verbal phone exchange with his colleague, Palestinian National Authority Chancellor Riyadh al-Maliki, that Iran will be the Palestinians’ struggle. others and their national rights aspirations. During his stopover in Lebanon, Zarif also spoke by phone with Palestinian Islamic Jihad leader Ziad Nahala and sent him a similar message.

The Iranian conservative and reformist press aligned itself with the official position of the Iranian regime, as well as the leaders of the Iranian security status quo, and explained the agreement as a “betrayal” and a “dubious agreement.” The ultra-conservative newspaper kayhan, acting as a spokesman for the Iranian leader, published a headline on August 15, 2020: “The UAE is now a valid target for the resistance forces.” Kayhan’s English edition chose the name “Deal with the Devil”.

Conservative newspaper Siyasat-e Rooz had a double headline: “The Zionist Union of the Emirates” and “Ben Zayed embraces Trump’s blood-dripping shoe.” The Javanese newspaper headlines the following headline: “The Betrayal and Stupidity of the Emirates” next to a photo of Palestinian protesters opposed to Bin Zayed at the Al-Aqsa Mosque.

The United Arab Emirates was once a major way for Iran to circumvent U.S. sanctions. However, in the last year and even more since the outbreak of the Corona plague, this channel has been blocked. The United Arab Emirates has taken a number of measures that oppose industrial trade unions interested in smuggling goods into Iran. It seems that with closer relations with Israel and the United States, UAE activity to prevent smuggling to and from Iran will continue. In Iran, calls were heard to “hurt the enemy.” These appeals were addressed in specific opposition to the United Arab Emirates and Crystal Palace (a reference to the business centers of the United Arab Emirates), which are waging a war against Iran.

Unsatisfied with the United Arab Emirates, Iran is expected to take various measures and increase its military activity and civilian presence on the disputed islands with the United Arab Emirates at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz (Abu Musa, Greater Tunb and Lesser Tunb). Iran will sign the Emirates that its movements are priced, and Iran intends to do so. At the same time, Iran can once again threaten freedom of navigation in the Arab Gulf region, warn the United Arab Emirates, and even inspire protests against UAE leaders.

Tehran faces several advances and several crises, both internal and external. The plague of the crown continues to wreak economic and civil havoc on the country. In Lebanon, along with Hezbollah, Iran faces the demanding consequences and situations of the explosion in the port of Beirut and among locals, which undermines its dream of building the Islamic Republic of the moment. Finally, on the outside stage, despite the victory of the U.S. Security Council and the failure of a proposed arms embargo, supported through the Gulf States, Iran will be more bogged down in its nuclear deal, especially because Trump’s management is compounded. our minds to the hotel to the recovery mechanism. automatically restore the opposing UN sanctions against Iran that existed before the 2015 JCPOA agreement.

1 https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1399/05/25/2327760/DAA9D8A7D8B1DB8CDAA9D8A7D8 AA D9 88 D8 B1- D8 AA D9 88 D8 A7 D9 81 D9 82- D9 86 D9 86 DA AF DB 8C D9 86- D8 A7 D9 85 D8 A7 D D8 B1 D8 A7 D8 AA- D9 88- D8 AF D9 88 D9 84 D8 AA- D8 AC D8 B9 D9 84 DB 8C- D8 B5 D9 87 DB 8C D9 88 D9 8 6 DB 8C D8 B3 D8 AA- D9 87 D8 A7- D8 A8 D8 B2 D8 B1 DA AF D8 AA D8 B1 DB 8C D9 86- D8 AE DB 8C D8 A7 D9 86 D8 A D8 AA D8 A7 D8 B1 DB 8C D8 AE DB 8C- D8 B6 D8 AF- D8 A2 D8 B1 D9 85 D8 A7 D9 86- D9 82 D8 AF D8 B3 / photo / 1

2 https://twitter.com/Amirabdolahian/status/1293983827442925572

Beit Milken

13 Tel Hai Street

Jerusalem, 9210717

Israel

Email: [email protected]

Tel: 972-2-561-9281

Fax: 972-2-561-9112

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *