A panel from Japan’s Ministry of Health on Wednesday approved Pfizer Inc’s COVID-19 vaccine for children up to six months of age.
In January, Japan expanded the use of the vaccine to others starting at age five. Last month, fitness officials began distributing booster vaccines from Pfizer and Moderna Inc that target the Omicron variant of the virus.
The organization also approved an edition of the Pfizer vaccine that protects against Omicron’s BA. 4 and BA. 5 subvariants. Moderna said last Wednesday it was seeking Japan’s approval for its own subvariant.
Sick. Leave alone.
6 months ?? At such a young level of development, why would it be so necessary?
Sick. Leave alone.
With much higher risks of infection, it doesn’t make sense, there’s an explanation for why pediatricians vaccinate children.
6 months ?? At such a young level of development, why would it be so necessary?
It is exactly for this reason that covering young children from the dangers to their physical condition is one of the daily jobs of adults.
Where are the studies describing the dangers rather than benefits of mRNA remedies in children as young as 6 months?
There are none. . .
Based on our pediatrician’s recommendations, my young people will get this experimental vaccine.
Unless a child has severe comorbidities, the threat of harm from those vaccines outweighs the threat posed by the virus itself.
That’s not what the clinical network of non-quacks says. Just read anti-vaccine sites or what? You seem a little disconnected from all reality, and what is happening in the clinical network. . .
Most European countries have banned injections for babies.
Only a minority of countries, all in Washington’s orbit, have them.
Denmark has now banned those vaccines for this very reason.
LOL can’t wait to cope. When the “scientific community” denies the “scientific community”.
Most European countries have banned injections for babies.
Obviously, distorting the genuine scenario is a valid argument.
Is the same with Denamark’s fake?
https://apnews. com/article/fact-check-Denmark-vaccine-children-439807145775
6 months ???
WTF. . . crazy!!!
David BrentToday 08:19 JST
@Algernon LaCroix: What medicine did you graduate from?
Do you read anti-vaccine sites or what?
I think it’s pretty self-evident that it is!
Which one did you graduate from?
You don’t need a medical degree to be able to spot misinformation. There are tens of thousands of doctors and other suitably qualified medical professionals around the world who recognize that those vaccines are not as effective as brands and their PR departments. You believe. They are coming out of carpentry now that it is r to do it.
Based on our pediatrician’s recommendations, my young people will get this experimental vaccine.
Since this vaccine is not experimental, if your pediatrician calls it that, it means that it would be to locate a doctor more prepared to take care of your family’s health.
Where are the studies describing the dangers rather than benefits of mRNA remedies in children as young as 6 months?
There are none. . .
It’s one thing to forget something, it’s quite another to blindly assume that the professionals who take care of children’s fitness are just as ignorant as you are.
https://www. gavi. org/vaccineswork/covid-vaccines-children-under-five-what-parents-need-know?gclid=Cj0KCQjw1vSZBhDuARIsAKZlijTFz9JETDrFUBdf3CoAIpqBlmcisWcxceDIF8KYkZVzVvNV1Vp50LMaAp-uEALw_wcB
LOL can’t wait to cope. When the “scientific community” denies the “scientific community”.
Well, since the argument is patently false, this is yet another example of employing misleading things when the real arguments (and the clinical community) aren’t what you need others to believe.
My 6 year old son was vaccinated without any symptoms. My 4-year-old daughter was considered too young to be vaccinated, but I hope she gets vaccinated now.
There are tens of thousands of doctors and other qualified medical professionals around the world who recognize that those vaccines are not as effective as brands and their PR departments would have you believe.
And yet, it does not bring a single identified clinical or medical establishment that says so, because according to you, each and every one of them, anywhere in the world, is involved in an alleged conspiracy that would harm the suitability of their members and families.
This is not a credible argument for those who even have a little common sense.
I don’t understand why parents would want to give their children a high fever or any other side effects as a result of those injections. I understand that the chances of having a negative effect are very slim, but why threaten it especially because the new variants of covid give you a fever similar to the one you suddenly have?Also, is there any coincidence that the center’s attacks on children are higher after they have been given those vaccines?
I don’t understand why parents should give their children a high fever or any other side effects that come from those shots. I understand that the chances of having a negative effect are very slim, but why threaten it especially from the new variants of covid?Is it going to give you a fever that you’re going to have all of a sudden?
This is because their assumption is incorrect, young people can get a very serious disease even with the Omicron variant and this is a great threat, much more significant than the side effects of vaccination. That threat is expanding and that’s why pediatricians have sought vaccine approval, if you have a child’s most productive interests in mind, vaccines are the rational choice.
https://www. asahi. com/ajw/articles/14733632
It’s also gone now, pharmaceutical corporations are hoarding billions with our new addictions in their vaccines.
It used to be once and now it’s going to be 6 times a year and to save you from cough and fever.
I guess those vaccines are more than covid prevention and it’s scary.
My young people can have them when they are 18 years old and they can make their own decisions and have informed consent and if they want to.
Benefits will have to outweigh the dangers by diligently opting for possible medical options for young people (or for oneself)
This madness is unjustifiable! Obese diabetic over years. Get vaccinated!6 months??? Never!!!
Before once and now they will be maybe 6 times a year and why save cough and fever
Read the reference provided, Omicron is just “cough and fever” and there is a threat even to children, if this threat can be reduced with vaccination, what argument do you have to allow parents to make this very rational decision?
I guess those vaccines are more than covid prevention and it’s scary.
So does an unfounded “guess” trump medical evidence?What if someone guesses otherwise, will this make vaccination now positive in their opinion?
Tried and tested vaccines, with a much higher protection profile, are adequate in my opinion.
What are the differences in the security profile you use?What is the threshold at which you felt good enough to get rid of your duty as a parent to make the maximum productive resolution based on evidence?Choosing not to vaccinate is already a resolution, and if it is proven to be the maximum risk, it is going against the duty of parents.
This madness is unjustifiable! Obese diabetic over years. Get vaccinated!6 months??? Never!!!
So, medical professionals, including pediatricians, say that this is mandatory and very much in line with epidemiological data showing that covid is a serious threat even to children, but other anonymous people on the Internet say that they know more and that all doctors are wrong.
It is not an argument.
What are the security profiles you use?
Knowledge of Goingboff from the CDC, NIH, etc.
Don’t confuse science with political science, and don’t let them kick children. Very harmful and disgusting.
Genuine knowledge (peer-reviewed studies, no press releases) obviously shows that for young people, the serious adverse effects of vaccines are much greater than those of the virus. This was already true with the first variants, today it is much more so. .
This madness will have to stop!
Perhaps if the child is vulnerable and has the greatest threat of headaches from a covid infection, the vaccine may be just one option. But in cases like that healthy 13-year-old boy who died the same night after taking the photo, you really want the threat/reward relationship. There is no definitive link between his death and the vaccine. . . But actually. . . Do you think I would have died if I hadn’t taken the vaccine that day?
https://youtu. be/JbrKAOXQSxg
It will have to be a difficult resolution for a parent to make.
There are tens of thousands of doctors and other qualified fitness professionals in the world.
I would say much more than that.
It will have to be a difficult resolution for a parent to make.
I don’t think it’s a difficult resolution to make. Not giving your child anything that can harm him with very few advantages is a simple resolution to make. Why would you accept it as true for pharmaceutical corporations to do the right thing?Google “The biggest fine in the history of thieves. “Now, would you accept them as true with your child?
https://youtu. be/JbrKAOXQSxg
It will have to be a difficult resolution for a parent to make.
Yes, the vast majority of parents are never exposed to this type of information.
For true informed consent, other people want to be well informed.
Based on our pediatrician’s recommendations, my young people will get this experimental vaccine.
Either you haven’t talked to a genuine pediatrician, or yours is a charlatan and you want a doctor who graduated from medical school and has a functioning brain.
6 months ??? Never!!!
Does it mean that, like all other vaccines, young people start at this age or earlier?
Alas, the horror!
It will have to be a difficult resolution for a parent to make.
It wasn’t complicated for me at all. I presented the vaxx to my kids as soon as they could.
I’m in 4x myself. I have stuck covid 0 times overall and never wear a mask.
What I find absolutely amusing is that NO report is provided (if any) on the number of inflamed young people who would lead “A Japanese Ministry of Health” (it begs the question: is there more than one ministry?) to get this vaccine?!
You are a vaccine taker.
Haha yes, okay. However, I will still be a vaccine.
You are a vaccine taker. It takes advantage of community immunity granted through mass vaccination, but does nothing to contribute to public health.
This may be true if those bites stopped transmission, but this is not the case.
And traveling on public transport without a mask is simply dangerous, it’s antisocial (there are other words to describe it too, but none of them would escape moderation).
This could be true if the mask prevented transmission and other people wore them exactly as directed and replaced them every two hours. But that’s not the case.
What else do you have in this quiver of flyers to throw at us?
This may be true if those bites stopped transmission, but this is not the case.
This is absolutely false, if vaccines decrease transmission (and knowledge proves it), this is enough to justify saying that vaccination benefits public health in general.
This could be true if the mask prevented transmission and other people wore them exactly as directed and replaced them every two hours. But that’s not the case.
The same argument is flawed, provided that the transmission of masks (and has been shown to do so) and a significant percentage of the population use them correctly, which makes the argument of their public aptitude gain advantages.
Distorting the scenario as if it were only one hundred percent or 0% power is what makes the arguments misleading and incorrect.
virusrexToday 11:46 JST
This may be true if those bites stopped transmission, but this is not the case.
This is absolutely false, if vaccines decrease transmission (and knowledge proves it), this is enough to justify saying that vaccination benefits public health in general.
This could be true if the mask prevented transmission and other people wore them exactly as directed and replaced them every two hours. But that’s not the case.
The same argument is flawed, provided that the transmission of masks (and has been shown to do so) and a significant percentage of the population use them correctly, which makes the argument of their public aptitude gain advantages.
Distorting the scenario as if it were only one hundred percent power or 0% power is what makes the arguments misleading and incorrect.
Pure rubbish, even the CDC was forced to oppose their original cheating claims. And when they even bother to wear masks in public, they take them off right after the cameras are turned off.
Lol in apnews and gavi links as a reference. The other people promoting vaccines write those articles, so of course they’ll claim it’s safe.