As the United States and others continue to put more pressure on Iran, Rohani suggested to the IAEA its “independence, impartiality, and professionalism. “
“Iran, as before, is in a position to cooperate strongly with the company within the guarantee framework,” Rouhani said, according to the government’s official website.
He described the agreement as “favorable” and said it may “finally solve the problems. “
Rohani also asked Grossi that Iran has “sworn enemies” with nuclear weapons that do not cooperate with the IAEA and “always seek to cause trouble” in Tehran.
Grossi told IAEA board members in March that he had “identified a number of problems similar to undeclared nuclear tissues imaginable and similar nuclear activities in 3 locations that were not reported through Iran” and that he lobbied to access them.
In its June report, the firm stated that it had taken the decision that a site had undergone “extensive remediations and leveling” in 2003 and 2004 and that there would be no audit price to inspect it. He said Iran had blocked access to the other two sites, one of which was partially demolished in 2004 and the other where the firm observed activities “consistent with disinfection efforts” of the facility since July 2019.
At the same time, it was under pressure that Iran had completed the agreed sites in the 2015 nuclear agreement, known as the Joint Comprehensive Action Plan, with the United States, Russia, China, Array Germany, France and Britain.
The nuclear deal promised iran economic incentives in exchange for restrictions on its nuclear program, and President Donald Trump unilaterally removed the United States from the agreement in 2018, saying it would renegotiate.
Since then, Iran has slowly violated restrictions in an attempt to pressure the remaining nations to create incentives to offset new US sanctions that cripple the economy.
The ultimate purpose of the agreement is to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear bomb. Since the withdrawal of the United States, Iran has stored enough uranium to produce a weapon, the Tehran government insists that it has no such purpose, and that its atomic program is only intended to produce energy.
Other members of the agreement have sought to keep the agreement alive, saying, among other things, that while Iran has violated many parts of the agreement, the ability of inspectors to continue at their nuclear sites is essential.
Back in Vienna, where the IAEA is headquartered, Grossi told reporters that inspectors would review the sites “very, very soon. “He said he couldn’t reveal the precise dates.
In their statement, both parties said that the agreement followed “intensive bilateral consultations” and that the IAEA no longer had requests.
“Based on research into the data to be held in the IAEA, the IAEA has no additional questions for Iran and other requests for access to the sites,” they said.
The IAEA Board of Governors followed a solution last June through Britain, France and Germany, urging Tehran to allow inspectors to the two disputed sites.