With a white handkerchief covering his mouth and nose, Rajkumar Prajapati’s tired eyes were visual as he lined up.
That was before dawn on August 5, but there were already many more waiting for him under fluorescent lights at the main exercise station in Pune, a commercial city not far from Mumbai, where they had just disembarked from an exercise. Each user carried something: a pack of cloth, a backpack, a bag of cereal. Each face was masked through a mask, a towel or the edge of a sari. Like Prajapati, most of the line staff were staff returning to Pune from their circle of family villages, where they had fled the lockup. Now, with the debts expanding, they were looking for work again. When Prajapati arrived here at the highest sensitivity of the line, officials took his coordinates and sealed his hand with ink, pointing to the desire for self-isolation for seven days.
After Prime Minister Narendra Modi gave the impression on national television on 24 March to announce that India would be blocked from fighting coronavirus, Prajapati’s paintings as a tipped plasterer at the structural sites around Pune were temporarily dried up. By June, his savings had run out and he, his wife and brother left Pune for their village 942 miles away, where they can simply have their family’s land for at least food. But in August, when the owner asked to be hired and reopened the sites of The Pune’s structure, they still had no option to return to the city. “We can die for the crown, but if there’s nothing to eat, we’ll die anyway,” Prajapati said.
As the sun rises, it left the station for Pune, the most inflamed city in the most swollen state in all of India. As of August 18, India has officially registered more than 2.7 million COVID-19 instances, ranking it third in the world in the United States and Brazil. But India is ready to outdo any of them. “I hope that at some point, unless things change course, India will have more instances than any other position in the world,” says Dr. Ashish Jha, director of Harvard’s Institute of Global Health. With a population of 1.3 billion, “there is plenty of room for exponential growth.”
Read more: The number of coronavirus deaths in India is increasing. Prime Minister Modi makes the lock anyway
The pandemic has already reshaped India beyond imagination. Its economy, which has grown every year for more than 40 years, was weakening even before the close, and the International Monetary Fund now expects it to contract by 4.5% this year. Many of the millions of people who have been displaced during decades of expansion are now threatened in more than one tactic. Like Prajapati, many of them have left their villages in recent years to seek new opportunities in the burgeoning Indian metropolises. But while his paintings have propelled his country to the fifth largest economy in the world, many have run out of resources through the closure. Deficiencies in India’s social coverage formula meant that millions of domestic migrant workers may simply not benefit social benefits or food from the government. Hundreds of others died and many more burned due to the meager savings they had accumulated over years of paintings.
Today, with the reopening of India’s economy, even when the virus shows no signs of slowing, economists are involved about how temporarily India can do it, and what is happening to the poorest in the meantime. “The most productive case situation is two years of very deep economic decline,” says Jayati Ghosh, president of the Center for Economic Studies and Planning at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi. “There are at least one hundred million people just above the poverty line. They’ll all fall underneath.”
In a way, Prajapati, 35, was a lucky man. He has lived and worked in Pune since the age of 16, although, like many workers, he regularly sends cash homes to his village and returns every year to help with the harvest. Over the years, his remittances helped his father build a four-room house. When he started the confinement, he even sent to his circle of relatives part of the $132 he had saved. Prajapati’s remaining $66 were even more than many had, and enough for 3 weeks. His landlord allowed him to defer payments on his rent. Two weeks after the lockdown, when Modi asked the citizens in a video message to turn off their soft sideboards and candles for nine minutes at nine o’clock at night. In a demonstration of national solidarity, Prajapati was excited, appeasing small oil lamps and lighting them in the shrines of his room and in front of his door. “We are very pleased to do so,” he said. We think I could help with the crown.
The rest of the migrant staff wasn’t that excited. For those whose daily wages paid for their evening meals, the closure had a quick and devastating effect. When factories and structure sites closed because of the pandemic, many bosses, who supply food and food to their transit staff, took everyone to the streets. And because social assistance is administered at the state point in India, migrant staff are not eligible for benefits such as outdoor food rations in their state of residence. With no food or money, and suspension of exercise and bus travel, millions of others still had no option to take a journey on foot to their villages a few hundred miles away without delay. By mid-May, another 3,000 people had died as a result of COVID-19, but at least 500 more had died from “deaths from distress,” adding those due to hunger, road injuries and lack of access to medical facilities, according to a Delhi-based study based on social and economic research. “It was very transparent that there had been a total lack of plans and a picture reflected on the implications of economic closure for the vast majority of Indian staff,” says Yamini Aiyar, president of the Policy Research Center, a group of delhi experts. .
A migrant painter who made the decision to embark on the adventure on foot was Tapos Mukhi, 25, who left Chiplun, a small town in the western state of Maharashtra, to his village in the eastern state of Odisha, more than 1,230 miles away. . He had tried to paint the lockdown, but his boss had withheld his salary, claiming he had no cash to pay for it immediately. Mukhi took another task at the site of a structure in June, but after a month of lifting bricks and bags of cement, a nail pierced his foot, forcing him to take a day off. His manager called him lazy and told him to leave without the $140 he earned. On August 1, he walked for a day in the monsoon torrential rain with his wife and 3-year-old daughter, before a local activist fixed a car in Pune. “We had traveled so far from our village to paint,” Mukhi said, sitting in a bunk in a shelter in Pune, where activists from a Pune-based NGO had given him and his circle of family exercise tickets. “But we didn’t get the money we were owed and we didn’t even get food. We’ve suffered a lot. Now we never need to get out of town again.
Although Indian lawmakers have long been aware of the extent to which the economy is based on occasional immigration work like Mukhi’s (an estimated 40 million people like him are traveling to the country to paint), the closure has brought this long-time invisible elegance from others to the national spotlight. “One thing that surprised everyone was the extension of our migrant painting force and how it is among all the cracks in the social safety net,” says Arvind Subramanian, Modi’s leading former economic adviser, who left the government in 2018. Modi was elected in 2014. after a crusade to solve India’s progress problems, but under its supervision, economic expansion increased from 8% in 2016 to 5% last year, while landmark projects, such as ensuring everyone in the country have a bank account, encountered obstacles. “The fact is that India really wants migration,” Subramanian says. “It’s a source of dynamism and an escalator that takes many other people out of poverty. But if you want to recover that source of income for the poor, you need to make sure that the social safety net is greater for them. »
The large-scale economic shock caused by confinement has disproportionately affected women. With 95% of women hired in India’s informal economy, many have lost their jobs, even though they had a duty to do family chores. Many have joined India’s rural employment program, which promises a safe number of unskilled manual working hours. Others sold jewelry or incurred debts to pay for meals. “The COVID scenario has a greater burden on women, either as economics and as caregivers,” says Ravi Verma of the Delhi-based International Women’s Research Centre. “They’re the front-line defenders in the family.”
But the guarantee of rural employment does not enlarge urban areas. In Dharavi, a sprawling slum in Mumbai, Rameela Parmar portrayed as a domestic servant in 3 families before closing. But the families told him not to come and withtained his salary for the last 4 months. For her own family, she was forced to portray clay pots daily, breathing in fumes that made her sick. “People have suffered more from confinement than [by] the crown,” Parmar says. “There’s no food or portraits, it hurts other people more.”
The women were also hard hit. For Ashwini Pawar, a bright-eyed 12-year-old girl, the pandemic meant the end of her childhood. Before the confinement, she was an eighth grader who enjoyed school and was looking to be an instructor one day. But her parents have been indebted to months of unemployment, forcing her to enroll in them in search of a daily salaried job. “My school is closed right now,” Pawar said, grabbing the corner of his shawl under a bridge in Pune where Transitority staff are picking up work. “But even when it reopens, I don’t think I can come back.” She and her 13-year-old sister now end their days at structure sites by erecting sandbags and bricks. “It’s as if we’ve fallen 10 years or more in terms of achieving gfinisher equality,” says Nitya Rao, a gfinisher and progression teacher who advises the UN on women’s education.
In an attempt to avoid the economic coup, Modi replaced his message in May. “Corona will remain a component of our lives for a long time,” he said in a televised confrontation. “But at the same time, we cannot allow our lives to be limited to the crown alone.” He announced a $260 billion aid program, or about 10% of the country’s GDP. But only a fraction of this amount came here as additional help for the poor, and most spent on corporate supervision. In the televised confrontation in delivering the package, Modi was continually talking about making India a self-sufficient economy. This has led Prajapati to lose hope of gaining government support. “Modiji said we had to become self-sufficient,” he said, referring to the prime minister with an honorary suffix. “What does that mean? That we can only depend on ourselves. The government left us alone.
When the blockade began to increase in June, Prajapati’s savings were exhausted. His government ID card indicated the situation in his village, so he was unable to access government food rations and found himself suffering to buy food for his family. Three times he visited a public square where a local nonprofit distributed meals. On 6 June, however, he left Pune for the village of his family, Khazurhat. He had been forced to borrow the $76 from his relatives to buy tickets for him, his wife and his brother. But after hearing the stories of migrants making fatal trips home, I was grateful to have discovered a safe way home.
Meanwhile, the virus had spread throughout India, despite the closure. The first hot spots were India’s largest cities. In Pune, four-year-old Kashinath Kale was admitted to a public hospital with the virus on The Fourth of July after queuing for about four hours. Doctors said I needed a fan bed, but none were available. His circle of relatives searched in vain for six days, but no hospital could provide one. On 11 July he died in an ambulance on the way to a personal hospital, where his circle of relatives had despite everything placed a bed in an extensive fan care unit. “I knew he was going to die,” Kale’s wife, Sangeeta, said, holding a framed picture of him. “I was in a lot of pain.”
In June, almost every day saw a new record of cases shown daily. And although COVID-19 has moved from the first hot spots in the cities to rural areas of the country where fitness services are less well equipped, public fitness experts have expressed concern, noting that India has only 0.55 hospital beds consisting of 1000 inhabitants, well below 2.15 in Brazil. and the United States 2.80. “Much of India’s fitness infrastructure is found only in urban spaces,” says Ramanan Laxminarayan, director of the Washington-based Center for Dynamics, Economics and Disease Policy. “As the pandemic develops, it moves to states with very low levels of testing and rural areas with weak public fitness infrastructure.”
Read more: India is the most populous country in the world right now. Can you handle the coronavirus epidemic?
When he returned to his village in Khazurhat, Prajapati’s neighbors feared that he had swelled up in Pune, so the district hospital doctor checked his temperature and asked if he had any symptoms. But he wasn’t presented with proof. “Although the tests have progressed in India, they are still far from where they want to be,” Jha says.
However, Modi has continually promoted India’s low mortality rate (the number of deaths as a percentage of the number of cases) as evidence that India is within the pandemic. (As of August 17, the rate was 1.9%, compared to 3.1% in the United States) “The average mortality rate in our country has been quite low compared to the world … and it’s a satisfaction that’s constantly declining,” Modi said at a televised video convention on August 11. This means that our efforts are proving effective.
But experts say language is dangerously misleading. “As the number of instances increases, the case rate will continue to decline,” says Jha. When the virus spreads exponentially as it does lately in India, he explains, cases are accumulating drastically, but deaths, which are delayed by several weeks, remain low, distorting the proportion to give the impression that a small percentage is dying. “No serious public fitness user thinks this is a statistic.” On the contrary, says Jha, this can give other people false optimism, expanding the threat of transmission.
Modi’s resolve to block the country in March found an increase in approval rates; many Indians praised the motion as strong and decisive. But while the honeymoons of other foreign leaders eventually gave way to popular resentment, Modi’s ratings remained stratospheric. In some recent surveys, they have exceeded 80%.
The reason has much to do with his broader political project, which critics see as an attempt to move India from a multi-religious constitutional democracy to an authoritarian, sumacist Hindu state. Since his re-election with a massive majority in May 2019, Modi’s Bharatiya Janata (BJP) party, the political wing of a much larger organization of organizations whose project is to make India a Hindu nation, has made several long-standing commitments. targets that excite its right-wing Hindu base at the expense of the country’s Muslim minority. (Hindus make up 80% of the population and Muslims make up 14%). Last year, the government revoked the autonomy of India’s only Muslim-majority state, Kashmir. And an opulent new temple is under structure in Ayodhya, a site where many Hindus who were born the Deity Ram and where Hindu fundamentalists destroyed a mosque on the site in 1992. After decades of legal disputes and political tension by the BJP in 2019, the Supreme Court nevertheless made the decision that a temple could be built in its place. On August 5, Modi attended a televised rite to lay the base stone.
Read more: The Battle for India’s Founding Ideals
However, before the pandemic, Modi faced his greatest serious challenge to date, in the form of months of national protests. Across the country, citizens accumulated in universities and public spaces, reading aloud the preamble to the Indian constitution, quoting Mohandas Gandhi and holding the Indian tricolor flag in the air. The protests began in December 2019 as a resistance to a debatable law that would make it more complicated for Muslim immigrants from Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh to unload Indian citizenship. They have become a broader crackdown on the country’s leadership under the BJP. At local elections in Delhi in February, the BJP campaigned as a platform to quell the protests, but eventually lost seats. Soon after, riots broke out in the capital; Another 53 people were killed, adding up to 38 Muslims. (Hindus also died in violence). The police didn’t interfere to save him. Hindu mobs wandering the Muslim neighborhoods in search of others to kill and, in some cases, joined mob attacks on Muslims themselves, according to a Human Rights Watch report. .
“Over the course of the hundred days, I think India had replaced forever,” says Harsh Mander, a prominent civil rights activist and director of the Centre for Equity Studies, a Delhi-based group of experts, on the 3 months of national dissent from December to March. But the lockdown put a sudden end to the protests. Since then, the government has intensified its crackdown on dissent. In June, Mander was charged through Delhi police (which is under Modi’s interior minister, Amit Shah) to incite the Delhi riots; in the fees opposed to him, they cited the open-air context of a speech he gave in December calling for protesters to continue the legacy of Gandhi’s nonviolent resistance, instead giving the impression that he was calling for violence. Meanwhile, the BJP’s local politician, Kapil Mishra, who was filmed just before the riots, giving Delhi police an ultimatum for transparent protesters on the streets for fear that his supporters would do it themselves, remains free. “In my farthest imagination, there could be no such repression,” Mander says.
Read more: “Hate is preached against us.” After Delhi riots, Muslims in India fear the future
A style was emerging. Police also arrested at least 11 other protest leaders, adding Safoora Zargar, a 27-year-old Muslim student who organized nonviolent protests. She was accused of inciting the Delhi riots and murder under the Illegal Activities Prevention Act, a harsh anti-terrorism law that the government used at least seven times during the lockdown to arrest activists or journalists. Amnesty International describes the law as a “harassment tool” and, through Zargar’s lawyer, Ritesh Dubey, in an interview with TIME, aims to “criminalize dissent.” As COVID-19 spread across the country, Zargar was detained for two months without bail, even though she was 12 weeks pregnant at the time of her arrest. Restrictions on the spread of coronavirus, such as not allowing lawyers to detain the hell on criminals, have also had an effect on the protesters’ access to legal justice, Dubey said.
“The government took advantage of this fitness emergency to weigh the biggest base motion this country has noticed since independence,” Mander says. “The Indian Muslim has been remodeled into an internal enemy. The economy has fallen, there is a great famine, infections are expanding and expanding, but none of this matters. Modi forgave everything else. This normalization of hate is almost like a drug.” In the poisoning of this drug, even hunger is acceptable.
Read more: It is already harmful to be Muslim in India. Then came the coronavirus
Close to hunger, Prajapati says Modi’s address has provided little relief to others like him. “If they didn’t give us anything from the government, not even a bag of rice, what shall we tell them?” He says. “I have no hope of the government.”
However, replacing the government would be too much for Prajapati, a devout Hindu and supporter of Modi, who supports the structure of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya and applauded the BJP when he revoked Kashmir’s autonomy. “There’s no one else like Modi we can trust,” he says. “At least he did smart things.
Prajapati stayed in Khazurhat from June to August, exploiting the acre of agricultural land from his circle of relatives where they grow rice, wheat, potatoes and mustard. But there were few other paintings available and the functionality of his farm was not enough for the circle of relatives. Now on a $267 debt to employers and parents, he made the decision to return to Pune with his wife and brother. Concerned about reports of a construction in the cases in the city, his father, regularly stoic, wept when he instructed him to leave the village. During his trip, Prajapati loaded 44 pounds of wheat and 22 pounds of rice, which he hoped to feed his circle of relatives until he could locate paintings of structures.
On the night of his return, Prajapati cleaned his house, prepared dinner with what he had brought from the village, and called on the contractors to look for paintings. The pandemic has reduced it for at least a year, he said, and it would take even longer to pay the cash he owed. The seal on his hand he had won at the station, indicating that he had to quarantine himself for seven days, had already vanished. Prajapati planned to paint as soon as he could. “If the blockade continues or not, no matter what, we have to live here and make money,” he said. “We have to find a way to survive.”
—With reports through Madeline Roache / London