COVID-19 has erased the sense of American exceptionalism.
For a century or more, America has been a beacon of hope and strength for the rest of the world. But his reaction to the pandemic, according to many public fitness experts, has been unfortunate, ineffective, rebellious and selfish. By some measures, the United States has treated the fitness crisis as badly as any other country.
Although the United States accounts for 4% of the world’s population, it accounts for a quarter of all COVID-19 cases and 22% of all deaths.
The country whose army and economic strength allowed victory in World War II, and whose trust and technological magic placed the first human being on the moon, now discovers himself as a style reversed the worst crisis of public aptitude in a century.
“America’s reaction, exaggerated, is a classic example of how to do things wrong,” said Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center.
While some U.S. states, namely New England, have done better than others, this reflects the disconnexaized national response, epidemiologists say.
Relatively dirty and wealthy countries such as Denmark, Germany, Senegal and Thailand have sent clear, coherent and transparent messages. They have implemented national policies guided by science than politics. More importantly, they have exercised strong national leadership.
“The first thing I would say is that they had a national policy,” Schaffner said. “It’s also the second, third and fourth things. They had a national policy. This national policy was very temporary and communicated in a transparent and coherent manner and was based on principles of public fitness.”
How did the inventory market achieve a record in a COVID-19-driven recession? Here’s what experts say about the rebound
Community spirit has been more powerful than in the United States, some fitness policy experts say.
“One of the things that moves me around the rest of the world compared to the United States is that there is a lot more sense of community,” said Dr. Krutika Kuppalli, vice president of the Global Health Committee on Infectious Diseases. Society of America and a medical specialist in diseases who has worked in Asia and Ebola in Africa. “America is much more about ‘I’ than ‘us’, whereas in other countries it’s more about ‘us’ than ‘I’.
“In a pandemic, we have to be ‘us’ and ‘I'”
Anna Petherick, a researcher at the Oxford University School of Government, which analyses The’s responses to COVID-19, said Americans were very skeptical of the guidelines.
“There are clever things in this attitude, but it does not serve the country well in times of crisis when it is obligatory to coordinate, when it is imaginable to give up non-public freedom by the intelligent collectives.”
Both South Korea and the United States recorded their first cases on January 20, but South Korea maintained its epidemic point in 30 cases, consistent with another 100,000 people, to 1655, consistent with another 100,000 people in the United States.
Last week, New Zealand went a hundred days without detecting a single example of spreading the virus on the net before dealing with an epidemic that led the government to postpone the general election for a month. The United States exceeded five million cases and 160,000 deaths at about the same time, with fixed cases in six states and maximum transmission rates prevailing in more than a dozen others.
Countries such as South Korea and Denmark have disposed of almost all restrictions on coronavirus. In the United States, the government at many hotspots has had to suspend or cancel the reopening of some companies. Hundreds of public fitness experts and fitness professionals have signed a letter calling for a national closure now, in the sixth month of the pandemic.
“If our reaction had been as effective as that of South Korea, Australia or Singapore, fewer than 2,000 Americans would have died,” his letter reads. “We may have avoided 99% of these deaths due to COVID-19. But we didn’t.”
Last week, senior White House adviser Jared Kushner defended Trump’s management strategy. In an interview with CNBC, he said management leads oversight of the purchase, production and distribution of masks, enthusiasts and other resources.
“As for a national strategy, the federal government’s job is to get the resources the country needed,” said Kushner, who is also the president’s father-in-law.
“You’ve heard all those hysterical reports about the frontline doctors not getting masks, not having enough enthusiasts, they had governors who were asking for many more enthusiastic than they needed, and again, each and every patient in America who needed a fan was given a fan, President Trump distributed them properly.” Kushner said.
COVID-19 has hit northeastern states hard: here’s what they’re doing to prepare for a sudden increase
Foreign Policy Analytics, an independent department and advisor to Foreign Policy magazine, reviewed several parameters to evaluate the functionality of 36 countries in reaction to COVID-19.
In addition to the country’s mortality rate and case rate, researchers tested the country’s public aptitude formula before the pandemic; the suitability and rigor of their public fitness movements (such as closures, social distance, testing, and tactile search); consistency, power and transparency of your communications; the primacy of science in political leadership; and stimulus and public conditioning inversions similar to coronaviruses.
“The United States is doing it wrong,” said Fouad Pervez, a senior policy analyst at Foreign Policy Analytics and lead researcher on the index.
Of the 36 countries, the index ranks the United States ranked 31st, second only to Indonesia, Turkey, Mexico, Iran, and China, the latter being the worst of all, mainly due to its lack of economic intervention and low transparency, particularly through the silencing of doctors. who gave the first alarms about the virus.
New Zealand had the highest score, followed by Senegal and Denmark. All earned the best ratings by policy guidelines, the financial fitness formula for the public and the mitigation of monetary damage to Americans and businesses, and consistent, transparent, and evidence-based communications.
The index placed the United States around the median of its public policies, just above the median in its economy and weak in its communications. The United States, the researchers said, “has been involved in incorrect information as much as any other country in the Index.” On the other hand, the authors said, the United States has not limited press freedom in reaction to the pandemic, as China and Iran have done.
Not all countries that have succeeded in containing the virus have followed exactly the same measures. “New Zealand has never handled masks,” said Jennifer Nuzzo, an epidemiologist at the Center for Health Safety at Johns Hopkins University.
Instead, he said, the island country has controlled a primary closure and a contact search wide enough to identify where other people have become ill. To make it less difficult to locate contacts, other people had to link to the businesses or restaurants they visited, making it less difficult for them to stumble if the infections were connected to those establishments.
Nuzzo said Taiwan, some other island nation, had never needed a general closure because it had implemented severe travel restrictions and a competitive testing program, contact tracking, and isolation of inflamed people. Singapore has also moved away from primary closures until it was “blinded,” Nuzzo said, through an epidemic in the dormitories housing migrant workers, an organization that the fitness government had not adequately overseen.
In addition to solid testing and isolation, South Korea has been competitive in tactile search generation, Kuppalli said. Not only does the country use GPS tracking on cell phones, users may not decide to unsubscribe, but touch trackers also use closed-circuit tracking and credit card activity to locate potentially exposed techniques that would possibly encounter resistance in the United States.
Kuppalli, who testified before a congressional committee last month facing responses to COVID-19 in the United States opposite those of other countries, praised Scotland for its hyper-transparency in the measures it takes and for the empathy shown through the fitness authorities.
“They have the message they all have in the country and we’ll take care of them,” Kuppalli said.
Scotland closed on a large scale and slowly reopened its business, explaining how it was falling and why, Kuppalli said. Countries that followed this trail recorded many fewer cases consistent with the capita when they kicked backed-up restrictions than the United States when states began rejecting the rules.
“Other countries opened until they controlled the virus in terms of a low number of instances or were fully aware of their instances in terms of detection, tactile search and quarantine,” said Luisa Franzini, president of fitness policy and control at the University of Maryland. School of Public Health.
“In the United States, some states reopened when instances did not even decrease, while they continued to increase,” Franzini said. “As worse cases were met, they simply doubled and began to reopen anyway.”
Some epidemiologists have pointed out that successful countries have national methods as opposed to the state-by-state approach of the U.S. Changing measures at state borders may make sense for speed limits, but not for communicable diseases.
“A virus doesn’t know the limits of other jurisdictions,” Franzini said. A state with strict blocking orders cannot protect itself from travelers from cowardly states with cowardly restrictions that bring the virus with them, he said, “a random technique doesn’t make sense.”
The disjunction led some states, in addition to New York and New Jersey, to force hot spot states to quarantine.
Public fitness experts say some of the successful countries had some experience when he hit COVID-19.
“Unlike the United States, people, especially in South Asia, have recalled the concern and threat of not responding to SARS and MERS,” said Dr. Jon Andrus, an epidemiologist and former deputy director of the Pan American Health Organization. don’t forget and build on your answer. It hasn’t dissipated as in America, where we have a crisis, and then we calm down and until the next crisis.”
In several of these Asian countries, other people were used to dressing in masks, Andrus said. But dressed in a mask, he said, symbolizes something larger than a measure of public fitness.
“There is an acceptance of movements to keep my network above any ill-informed technique toward non-public freedom,” Andrus said.
This attitude is widely accepted in the United States, Andrus said, and the rest of the world freezes it.
“My friends see American exceptionalism as selfishness,” he said.
Outdoor schools helped fight pandemics in the 1900s: do they come back?
Not sure about the protection of neck protectors? Here’s what you want to know