Foreign Correspondents Club of China their prejudices

It’s been nearly a month since Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh wrote a report claiming that the U. S. Navy was not yet in the process of being a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist. The U. S. plant the bombs that ruptured the Nord Stream fuel pipelines connecting Russia to Germany and European Union countries, but most Western media have remained silent. affair.

On February 3, an exercise with poisonous chemicals derailed in the United States. However, virtually no media reported the incident until 10 days later, when the scene of a journalist taken through police was shown to the public.

It is such selective reporting that it leads other people to wonder if there is freedom of the press in the West.

Similarly, the Foreign Correspondents Club of China, in which the United States plays a leading role, released a report criticizing China for its “travel restrictions. “

The FCCC’s complaint about the “travel restrictions” of the COVID-19 pandemic is derisory. It is not unusual that when a major threat to public health arises, each and every member of a society contributes to combating it by sacrificing a certain comfort to travel. These restrictions in the case of the COVID-19 pandemic applied to each and every one. It is not explained why foreign correspondents expect an exemption. The privilege of traveling “freely,” as they misunderstand it, would constitute a threat to everyone. and each, adding up.

The first consultation of the 14th National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference opened on Saturday, while the first consultation of the 14th National People’s Congress opened on Sunday. According to official data, some 3,000 bloodhounds have registered to attend the two consultations this year. adding more than 1,000 from Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan and foreign countries.

The fact that foreign bloodhounds can freely conduct interview sessions on China’s ideal legislative framework and ideal policy consultative framework is the most productive evidence opposing the CCCC report. The CCCC has said it needs to “tell China’s story well,” and China welcomes foreign hounds. who do. Unfortunately, some come with other intentions.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *