Experts: Policy will struggle to save you an effective COVID-19 vaccine

Despite valid public considerations about political rhetoric, politics influences the progression of a COVID-19 vaccine, several public fitness experts told Congress Wednesday.

Independent researchers and they are largely following vaccine development, said Dr. Mark McClellan, director of Duke-Margolis Health Policy Center at Duke University and a former food and drug administration brokerage.

“It’s not a simple procedure to interrupt just because it says something about it,” he said. “However, it undermines trust. “

President Donald Trump has said the coronavirus vaccine could be available “soon,” “within a few weeks” and before Election Day. This raised fears that the White House would pressure the FDA to authorize a vaccine before it went through full regulation. surveillance process, as has happened with at least two COVID-19 treatments.

Public health experts and doctors who testified before the House Energy and Commerce Committee on Wednesday said they didn’t think it was possible, they didn’t rule it out altogether.

If a COVID-19 vaccine were launched before it was fully and well verified, the public would know because scientists and researchers would tell you, Dr. Paul A said. Offit, director of the Centers for Vaccine Education at Philadelphia Children’s Hospital.

“You will also listen to others like Dr. Francis Collins and Tony Fauci, who are trusted by the American public, as well as many other academics and researchers who would not,” said Offit, who also sits on an independent vaccine review committee that advises the FDA.

McClellan noted that on Tuesday, seven former FDA communications published an opinion paper in the Washington Post stating that while the Trump administration has undermined the CREDIBILIty of the FDA, they have continued to rely on the integrity and clinical paintings of agency staff.

A vaccine can be approved within the next month, even under an emergency use authorization, only if there is a “boost” in terms of science, with everything in the studies and procedure working perfectly. Even then, it will have been strict FDA oversight, McClellan said.

The fact that politicians communicate only blurs the lines and creates confusion that does not help, said Dr. Ashish Jha, Dean of Brown University’s School of Public Health.

If career scientists at the FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are allowed to do their job and speak freely with the public, the procedure will be healthy, he said.

“What I’ve been asking is for politicians to be silent, not to talk about a date, and for the clinical procedure to move forward,” he said. “This would be incredibly useful and would go a long way to giving the American other people trust that this is an integrity procedure. “

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *