Dr. Li-Meng Yan China fake science and COVID-19 cover-up

Get the WION News app to get the news

For months after the outbreak began, China flooded clinical literature with sophisticated and not-so-sophisticated messages that supported its narrative that COVID-19 is an herbal disease.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Communist Party of China, supported by some Western scientists and a politically motivated media outlet, has been desperately seeking to convince the world that the COVID-19 virus was originally a bat beta-coronavirus that has undergone an herbal mutation process and then acquired through humans after exposure to inflamed animals.

Undoubtedly, such subterfuge is intended to secure the vested interests, adding the potentially devastating political and economic consequences for China, corporate and global staff investment in China, and a negative effect on clinical collaboration and investment in studies by primary Western study laboratories.

In his first article, “Unusual SARS-CoV-2 Genome Features Suggesting a Complicated Laboratory Amendment that An Herbal Evolution and Delineation of Its Likely Artificial Route,” Chinese scientist and whistleblower Dr. Li-Meng Yan presented biological evidence showing that the COVID-19 virus was manufactured in a laboratory.

Now, Dr. Yan has published his clinical paper for the time being “SARS-CoV-2 is an unlimited biological weapon: a fact revealed by finding a large-scale fixed clinical fraud”, which describes the ordinary efforts that he has gone through. the Chinese Communist Party. . -Realize the true laboratory origin of the COVID-19 virus to escape the duty of the pandemic.

For months after the outbreak began, China flooded the clinical literature with sophisticated and not-so-sophisticated messages supporting its narrative that COVID-19 is an herbal disease that “jumps” from animals to humans on the market. seafood store from Wuhan.

After countless media reports and clinical studies, the theory that Wuhan’s seafood market is the source of transmission of animal-human COVID-19 has been completely discredited, including through China’s Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

On February 3, 2020, Dr. Zheng-Li Shi, a “batwoman” of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, published an article suggesting that COVID-19 originated in bats and that a bat coronavirus called RaTG13 was 96. 2% equal to the COVID-19 virus. , supporting herbal theory.

One way to know if a virus is connected or evolved from some other virus, in this case, RaTG13 and the COVID-19 virus, is to compare mutations as synonymous and not synonymous in genetic code.

The genetic code of DNA, which is composed of combinations of guanine nucleotides, adenine, cytosine and timine (G, A, C and T), determines the arrangement of proteins. This makes 3 nucleotide equipment called codons that correspond to express amino acids, protein building blocks, and this code is redundant.

For example, the amino acid arginine can be produced through CGT, CGA, CTC or CGG codons, meaning that the third nucleotide of the codon is redundant or replaceable and will encode the arginine. Any replacement in the first nucleotide or at the moment will produce another amino acid.

Therefore, a viral genetic code can mutate, but produce the same amino acid or a “synonymous” result. A mutation in the first nucleotide moment of a codon will result in another amino acid, a “not synonymous” result.

In the absence of a primary herbal or synthetic recombinant event, viruses that are herb-like or evolve with each other, as stated through RaTG13 and COVID-19, have more or less popular proportions comparing synonymous and non-synonymous mutations.

Dr. Yan’s knowledge shows that when comparing reports of synonymous and non-synonymous mutations between a critical segment of the RaTG13 and COVID-19 viruses, the result “is and constitutes a violation of the principles of herbal evolution”.

The interpretation is that RaTG13 and the COVID-19 virus may not be connected to each other through herbal evolution and that RaTG13 is most likely a manufacturing.

In addition, a reconstructed RaTG13 receptor binding domain is attached to angiotensin 2 conversion enzyme receptors in two horseshoe bat species, implying that RaTG13 may simply exist in a bat population from which it would mutate and infect humans, completely undermining recurrence. Theory.

Dr. Yan also questions the accuracy of knowledge of China’s pangolin coronavirus (squamous anteater) on which dozens of clinical studies are based examining coronavirus recombination occasions.

In early June, another new bat coronavirus, rmYN02, which bears a 93. 3% serial similarity to the COVID-19 virus, was known and used for the Chinese Communist Party’s argument that the pandemic was an herbal epidemic.

In this weak attempt at herbal theory, the Chinese authors of the article rmYN02 claim that an insertion of amino acid proline-alanine-alanine (PAA) represents an ancestor of proline-arginine-arginine-alanine (PRRA) polybasic inguinal excision site discovered in the COVID-19 virus, but has not been discovered in any other similar bat coronavirus.

The presence of the polybastic division of furine is a marker of genetic manipulation and, therefore, countering this would be a vital objective of the Chinese Communist Party’s propaganda device.

RmYN02 speculation disintegrates under examination because the SPG series is chemically neutral, not basic and splits anything.

RmYN02 even possesses the arginine-serine excision point (SAR) discovered in the COVID-19 virus and all similar coronaviruses and the published RmYH02 series appears to be out of alignment.

Dr. Yan’s clinical article of the moment adds another nail to the coffin of China’s false theory that the COVID-19 pandemic is natural.

(Lawrence Sellin, Ph. D. es a retired colonel in the U. S. Army Reserve. U. S. , who in the past worked at the U. S. Army Medical Research Institute. But it’s not the first time On Infectious Diseases and has conducted fundamental and clinical studies in the pharmaceutical industry. Your email is lawrence. sellin@gmail. com)

Lawrence Sellin is a retired colonel in the U. S. Army. But it’s not the first time

Stay connected with us

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *