Donald Trump’s COVID-19 remedy exposes hydroxychloroquine nutcases as Rep. Andy Biggs

Surprisingly, it turns out that the team of world-class fitness professionals who guided President Donald Trump to recovery from COVID-19 relied on the remedy made a decision through the world’s most productive clinical minds rather than a tweeted suggestion. by an award winner. American family contest in Arizona.

Wow, what are they thinking?

For much of our pandemic year, Trump and a clique or henchmen, adding the Arizona Republican. Andy Biggs defended the denied concept that hydroxychloroquine, a malaria-opposing drug, deserves to be used as a remedy for COVID-19. Biggs handled hydroxychloroquine more than a dozen times on Twitter and talked about it over and over again.

After Trump’s diagnosis, Biggs tweeted:

I send my most productive wishes and prayers to president @realDonaldTrump and @FLOTUS for an early recovery of COVID-19. I inspire you to take hydroxychloroquine for recovery, and I’m sure you’ll resume your general routines right away. near the future.

I send my wishes and prayers to president @realDonaldTrump

However, when the president’s doctors described Trump’s diversity of remedies to fight the virus, hydroxychloroquine was not mentioned.

Dr. Sean P. Conley, the president’s physician, said Trump won an infusion of an experimental antibody treatment, which referred to a five-day cure for reinfection, an antiviral drug. It also gained zinc, vitamin D, melatonin, aspirin and steroid dexamethasone for extensive use, but hydroxychloroquine.

Looking for the other aspect of the story? Subscribe today for even more feedback.

Like Kellie Owens, Data Researcher

This did not prevent Biggs, whose political and non-public good fortunes, from relying on the “randomized controlled trial meta-analysis” exam, but on the fact that Ed McMahon and Dick Clark once submitted a $10 million check, winner of the draw.

And more.

As a self-proclaimed snake oil trader leader, Biggs not only drove the use of a drug that science says is not useful and dangerous, but suggested to others to “unmask,” challenging the most productive and clinical protection. data from national experts on the most productive infectious diseases.

Mask orders, for Biggs, are tyrannical.

I don’t know how or why anti-science has a political point of view, but that turns out to be for Biggs.

As recently reported in a Nature article, the mask saves lives, adding that “research shows that there is a possibility of transmitting and contracting coronavirus, and some studies recommend that the mask can determine the severity of the infection if others get the disease. “

Then there’s the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Robert Redfield said at a Senate hearing that if Americans wore masks for several weeks, “we would be facing this pandemic. “He said the mask was “a better defense. “

He added: “I can even say that this mask is safer to protect me from COVID than when I take a COVID vaccine because it can reach 70%. And if I don’t get an immune response, the vaccine probably wouldn’t protect me. This mask will be. “

Or it can happen with the guy in the contest.

Contact Montini at ed. montini@arizonarepublic. com.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *