At least the states (California, Nevada, New York, Oregon, and Washington) and a black health organization say they will conduct an independent audit of all COVID-19 vaccines approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
These review panels, which began to appear last month, aim to instill public confidence and counter the political veil cast on the progression and approval of the COVID-19 vaccine. In recent weeks, religion has taken a step forward in the FDA’s commitment to base COVID-19 vaccine decisions on science, however, the growing number of surveillance equipment must carry some other layer of trust.
And while there are considerations that independent review forums would possibly interfere with effort, everyone agrees that accepting construction as true is vitally important. A survey this month found that only 58% of Americans said they would be vaccinated as soon as a vaccine was given. Available.
“We need to give washingtoners maximum certainty that when a COVID-19 vaccine is available, it’s effective,” Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said of the pact.
The first impulse for outdoor surveillance was the FDA on September 21, when the National Medical Association announced that it would identify an executive organization trained to review all decisions related to vaccines and remedies for COVID-19. in 1895, at a time when racism in medical teams excluded black doctors.
“Topics of political influence in the clinical procedure as a result of Operation Warp Speed (OWS) have threatened public confidence in the FDA that would obstruct participation in clinical trials, in the African-American community,” the agreement said in its announcement.
The first state to launch a follow-up organization in New York on September 24. At that time, the clinical network involved on FDA pressure on the Trump administration to temporarily approve a vaccine to make it available through the presidential election.
It is an expectation expressed through President Trump in tweets, press meetings and election rallies.
“The dispute between the White House and the FDA raises serious questions about whether the vaccine has been politicized or not,” New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said on September 24.
“Frankly, I will not accept as true the opinion of the federal government and would not propose New Yorkers based on the opinion of the federal government. We will establish our own review panel led by the Ministry of Health to review the vaccine. “
The climate around vaccines began to replace on September 8, when vaccine developers issued a public letter in which they promised to keep policy out of science. Soon after, and defying White House tension, the FDA strongly insisted on requiring at least two months of protection knowledge before a vaccine could be available.
Last week, however, California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that the state would set up an independent 11-member working group on reviewing clinical protection for the protection of COVID-19 vaccines as an additional guarantee of any effort through the Trump administration to accelerate the vaccine. approval process.
“We don’t take anyone’s word,” Newsom said at a news convention uttering the decision. “We will put into force our own independently reviewed process with our world-class experts.
On Tuesday, Oregon, Nevada and Washington announced that they were joining the effort.
“We appreciate the opportunity to enroll in other western states to help build confidence in a COVID-19 vaccine,” said Richard Whitley, director of Nevada’s Department of Health and Human Services.
While some experts believe that additional verification of FDA decisions may be helpful, others are concerned that at least the state’s well-intentioned efforts may also cause harm.
Monica Schoch-Spana, a medical anthropologist and researcher at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Safety, said it makes sense to participate in a vaccine approved by black doctors because of long-term systemic racist biases in the fitness care system.
“These are fitness professionals who perceive the ancestral trauma and fresh and continuous systemic bias experienced by their black patients and their families,” he said. It will be helpful to listen to the leaders of your own communities.
Ideally, Schoch-Spana said, more voices talking about the validity of the procedure will help repair confidence in the FDA, which has traditionally protected the country from harmful drugs and treatments.
“It’s understandable that some jurisdictions need to make an additional effort to gain public confidence in the vaccine,” he said.
However, additional degrees of surveillance can further undermine the FDA’s credibility and public confidence in agency decisions, according to some. There is a threat of more confusion in people’s minds at a harmful time when the US and its allies in the Middle East have been able to do so. But it’s not the first time They are reaching 100,000 new instances of COVID -19 a day, said Sandra Crouse Quinn, senior associate director of the Maryland Center for Health Equity.
“I sense that they are seeking to face the fear that this is a political process, which has undermined the trust of many people, especially of communities of color whose acceptance as true has already been reduced,” he said. I’m not sure, that’s the way forward. “
It is vital that the FDA is a world-class company that has shown that it would possibly not bend to politics, said Lois Privor-Dumm of Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, where she is director of the International Adult Immunization Program. Access center.
“They didn’t bend over to speed up approval before the election, which is a smart thing to do,” he said. “They have amassed independent experts to read about this. “
The big question is what happens if one of those review committees says they don’t administer a specific vaccine.
“States don’t have the strength to say whether or not they’re going to license their state, so I don’t know what they would do if they hesitated,” Quinn said. It does not conform to this vaccine, no matter what the FDA indicates. Does it?”
The hope, he added, is that teams will support the FDA’s findings as solid and spread the word.
“They would say, “We accept as true with the FDA, but we accept as true with and check. Now we’ve checked and we’re in a position to go. “