On Wednesday (September 30), the Dutch government changed its long-standing stance against the council of wearing masks in maximum public places (except public transport) to slow down coronavirus transmission, while new cases of coronavirus in the Netherlands are in record.
This week, the country will enter a partial blockade, as not only the positivity of the tests reaches 14%, the number of hospitalizations and the use of extensive care are expanding at an immediate rate. The government has now made the mask “mandatory. “”for other people to use in indoor public spaces.
Jaap van Dissel, director of the National Institute of Public Health of the Netherlands, remains insensitive to what he perceives as the ineffectiveness of non-medical masks. Just 10 days ago, he reiterated the claim that these masks had “little or no effect. “statements through van Dissel warned that non-medical masks give other people a “false sense of security. “
According to van Dissel, physical distance is a much more vital preventive measure than masks. To stop the spread of coronavirus, their advice is the same as in March: others will have to physically distance themselves and use intelligent hygiene, as well as respect the limits of giant meetings.
Van Dissel went on to say that enforcing the new rules and regulations on the mask is a “political decision” and not a “scientific decision. “Ironically, van Dissel is the one who politicizes the mask by stating that the regulations and rules on its use are “political”.
Van Dissel is not the only one who resists masks in Europe: Anders Tegnell, a leading epidemiologist at the Swedish Public Health Agency, has continually expressed his skepticism that non-medical masks will help the coronavirus epidemic.
In this aspect of the pond, Scott Atlas is a skeptical mask and new member of the White House Coronavirus Working Group, he is not an epidemiologist or a specialist in infectious diseases, however, he has been given a leading role in the Working Group. has questioned the effectiveness of the mask at times, saying there is no counterfeit science to help mask.
However, there is growing evidence in favor of the use of non-medical masks, not as a panacea, but as a preventive device, along with physical distance, hygiene and collection length limits. Since the beginning of the pandemic, in March and April, when evidence of the effectiveness of the mask is “rare and controversial”, an increasing number of articles under pressure on its usefulness. At the time, experts argued that even when direct experimental evidence of the advantages of obtaining a mask is unclear, the mask face dress begged based on what is called a “precautionary principle”.
In June, a large number of articles were published, and one was added that provided empirical evidence on the role of the face mask in reducing coronavirus transmission in Germany. The same month, a publication in Health Affairs warned that wearing the face mask may have helped curb the spread of coronavirus in parts of the United States. Look in comparison at US states. Require the use of a mask on the network to mitigate the spread of new coronavirus states that have not followed that command. The requirement to wear a face mask in public related to a minimum in the daily expansion rate of coronavirus cases.
The World Health Organization replaced its brain on the mask in early June, recommending its use to the general public, especially indoors and where physical distance is possible.
At this stage, after so many public fitness agencies have adjusted their mask policies, it turns out that the reluctance to adopt masks is stubborn, even short-sighted.
Perhaps someone deserves to ask public health officials who are skeptical about the mask, whether the mask has little or no effect on preventing pathogen transmission, so why did Japan see a dramatic drop in influenza cases after the country began to dress in a universal mask?In February of this year ?? And why has the southern hemisphere had such a low incidence of influenza since masking has become widespread?In fact, masks have contributed, as have physical remoteness, to more diligent hygiene and other interventions, such as restrictions on crowd size.
Of course, not detecting the effects of certain non-pharmaceutical interventions that can save you disease transmission is not new. In the 19th century, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis encouraged washing his hands to save his infections. He based his advice on in-depth observation, not peer-reviewed testing. Semmelweis was then ridiculed through the established medical community, which in the end drove him crazy.
Just before positive for coronavirus in the presidential debate on September 29, President Trump mocked Biden for constantly dressing in a mask. “I don’t wear a mask like him. Every time he sees it, they gave him a mask. just talks two hundred yards away and appears with the biggest mask I’ve ever seen. “
Perhaps if the president had been more diligent in dressing in a mask, he would not have Covid-19.
Full policy and updates on the coronavirus
I am an independent fitness analyst with over 22 years of experience in fitness care and pharmaceutical analysis. Specifically, I analyze the price (costs and benefits) of
I am an independent fitness analyst with over 22 years of experience in pharmaceutical and fitness analysis. Specifically, I analyze the price (costs and benefits) of biological and pharmaceutical products, patients’ access to prescription drugs, regulatory frameworks for drug progression and reimbursement, and ethics in the distribution of fitness resources. I have more than 110 publications in industry journals and peer reviews, as well as newspapers and periodicals. I have also presented my paintings at business, industrial and educational conferences. From 1999 to 2017, I was an associate professor of studies at the Tufts Center for the Study of Drug Development. Prior to my appointment at Tufts, I was a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Pennsylvania and finished my PhD in Economics at the University of Amsterdam. Before I completed my PhD, I was a control representative at Accenture in The Hague, The Netherlands. Currently, I am self-employed in a variety of studies, coaching and writing projects.