CovVI-19 CovVI-19 targeted the Biden Vax erased through the White House, replaced through a “true origins” virus guide

The website, which in the past went to the sale of the Coronavirus vaccine to the Americans, now guides readers through evidence that support the laboratory flight theory, how the former National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, former President Joe Biden, walked for “any crime against” the United States. Regulation and mask mandates.  

The inherited media, DC newspapers are investigating the scandals for years after the conservatives have sounded the alarm

The new covid. gov that appears what the White House calls the “Royal Origins of Coronavirus. (Covid. gov)

“The proximal origin of the SARS-COV-2 ‘publication, which has been used several times through public aptitude and the media to discredit laboratory leak theory, was promoted through Dr. Fauci to boost the favorite story that COVVI-19 is,” the site indicates, before throwing in five balls in the origins of the virus.  

The new site emphasizes that a biological characteristic discovered in the virus has not been discovered in nature, strengthening the theory of laboratory leaks, while noting that Wuhan, in China, where the first case of Coronavirus discovered, also houses the “larger laboratory of larger” Studies of China “and that” if there was evidence of herbal origin, it would have already emerged. But it is not. “

Subcommité Space concludes COVID-19 “most likely” that he fled Wuhan Lab

Trump’s management unveiled a new Covviv on April 18, 2025. (Covid. gov)

The CIA of Trump’s management previously brought in 2025 that a laboratory leak in the origin most likely of the COVVI-19 virus, which had been transmitted through the media and scientists as a theory of the probable conspiracy at the beginning of the pandemic. The Ministry of Energy under the Biden administration and former director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, in 2023, also indicated that the coronary the result of a laboratory leak.  

Credibility crisis: The New York Times helped to fool the United States about Covid Lab Leak Theory

They also guide readers through the origins of the regulations of the Covid era, such as mask mandates and social distancing.  

“The Social distancing council of the” six period “, which closed schools and small businesses throughout the country, arbitrary and not founded in science,” he said. “During the testimony of closed doors, Dr. Fauci testified that the Council” seems in a way. ” 

The online page indicates mask mandates: “There was no conclusive evidence to mask well to the Americans of COVID-19.  

Many media outlets rejected Trump in 2020 when he said he saw evidence of the virus from a Wuhan lab in China.   (Alex Brandon/The Associated Press)

The signals that the content of the page arrived directly from the subcommittee of the Subcommittee of the Chamber’s Supervision Committee on the Coronavirus pandemic.  

“Public aptitude officials induce other American people through contradictory messages, instinctive reactions and lack of transparency,” said the online page under a component called “COVVI-19 misinformation. ” “More manifest, the federal government diabolized remedies of choice and private accounts, such as laboratory leaks, in a shameful effort to force and control the aptitude decisions of other US people. ” 

Trump made me do it: the liberal media blame their rejection of laboratory leaks in the “president” of the former president

The new online page Covid. gov aims at stories promoted through the media and the Democrats the pandemic.   (Covid. gov)

Click to download the Fox News application 

Many media rejected Trump in 2020 when he said he had noticed evidence that the virus arrived here from a Wuhan, China, the laboratory, in front of American intelligence, such as Wray and the Ministry of Energy, indicating that the virus probably from there.  

Since then, many sales issues have published articles that appear that the theory is credible, in particular the New York Times, which leads a March chronicle, claiming that the clinical network had “messy” the public in an effort to suppress the theory, even after the clinic of the article called “racist” theory.  

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *