In recent years, cybercrime and hackers have increased dramatically. Every few weeks, we hear about some other knowledge gap, a phishing scam or an attack on social media paintings that affect millions of other people. It is estimated that cybercrime is committed every 39 seconds somewhere in the world, with an estimated value of $6 trillion through 2021. And those tests were carried out before tens of millions of people were suddenly forced to paint from home without time for proper cybersecurity. . Planning.
But the dangers of cybercrime faced by Americans fleeing home are just the tip of an iceberg of highly damaging cyberattacks. There is strong evidence that Russia, China and potentially other adversaries have attempted to hack into the databases of universities and institutes of study to obtain loans from potentially important intellectual assets connected to Covid-19. Pharmaceutical corporations have also noticed a barrage of piracy attempts. And just a few days ago, the Supreme Court of the European Union ruled that U.S. privacy. It is insufficient to share non-public data and other sensitive data, potentially threatening our ability to work with U.S. countries. About vaccines and treatments.
With millions of lives and trillions of dollars at stake, the United States is in a damaging position with respect to pandemic vulnerabilities, adding cybersecurity. To accurately perceive what we’re up against, I asked Bryan Cunningham, a longtime cybersecurity and privacy lawyer and founding executive director of the University of California’s Irvine Cybersecurity Research and Policy Institute, what’s going on, what the purpose is, and what precautions Americans take.
Nicole Fisher: As the global focuses on the economic and fitness threats posed by Covid-19, cybercriminals around the world are capitalizing on this crisis. Most people don’t know all the tactics that cybersecurity can threaten or what the implications are. So how can cybercriminals (or use) the pandemic to their advantage?
Bryan Cunningham: Like politicians, bad cyber actors never let a crisis get lost. A few days after Johns Hopkins released his widely cited Covid-19 statistical map, cyber attackers launched an almost replica that, if clicked on, would launch a cyberattack on his device. In addition to the plethora of false evidence and remedies sold on the Internet (a story as old as time), the countries’ professional hackers, especially in Russia and China, are launching major attacks against Covid-19 researchers in the West, seeking scouse borrowed IP that can speed up treatments, vaccines and the like.
Fisher: Sounds like espionage. Is that what we’re talking about? We heard a lot about Russia and China hacking U.S. data. But how does this happen in the clinical and medical communities?
Cunningham: The U.S. Director of National Intelligence declared a few years ago before Congress that the theft of Chinese intellectual assets opposed to the United States was the largest wealth movement in human history. Even in general times, the People’s Republic of China, the Russian Federation, and other states concentrate enormous intelligence resources on the theft of western intellectuals’ assets, whether similar to medicine, defense or other complex technologies. Recent reports have validated, unsurprisingly, significant efforts, namely through the Russian intelligence services, to take all studies in the West and target vaccines or remedies opposed to Covid-19. Let us hope that the United States and allied governments will take steps to combat these vital threats; however, academics, public fitness scientists and other scholars should also be vigilant at: don’t click on links they are unsure that they are from trusted colleagues; Using multi-factor authentication, virtual personal networks (VPNs) and strong passwords; and use common sense before sharing data with someone.
Fisher: Let’s communicate more about foreign affairs. What is happening in Europe with this Schrems II decision? I sense that this means that the knowledge and privacy of the U.S. They do not meet European standards. So basically, without significant intelligence, surveillance, and privacy reform in the United States, could we lose to the fitness and clinical knowledge of Europe that could help us fight coronavirus?
Cunningham: The European Union Court of Justice (JEC) this week annulled the “Privacy Shield” agreement between the US and Europe that allowed US companies to transfer non-public knowledge from the EU. U.S. citizens, who believe that U.S. privacy It is good enough under applicable European law. Like its previous ruling to cancel the U.S. Safe Harbor agreement, The Court found that U.S. intelligence and surveillance legislation. It does not provide good enough privacy coverage for non-Americans and discriminates against non-Americans. The Privacy Shield agreement made transatlantic knowledge movements imaginable across more than 5,000 in the U.S. And the EU. 0.33 of all global industrial flows.
Unlike the United States, the European Union has comprehensive privacy protections for its EU-registered citizens. Charter of Fundamental Rights and the recently followed General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). These protections come with limitations on government oversight and significant redress mechanisms for others with poor oversight. In 2015, the EJ DECIDED annulled the previous “safe harbor” agreement with the United States, which allowed US corporations to move protected knowledge from the EU. U.S. citizens in the U.S. Even though the EU. Isn’t U.S. privacy appropriate? The Court was concerned about the lack of a legal mechanism for the UNITED. to find out if they have been monitored through the U.S. government and to download a significant refund for any illegal invasion of your privacy.
Fisher: So what does this mean for fitness care and Covid-19?
Cunningham: Without significant reforms to the intelligence and privacy law in the United States, this decision and others that will follow can pose a significant risk not only to the transatlantic economy, but also to our ability to work with the EU. countries on vaccines and treatments. Such reforms will be difficult, if possible, and will take a long time. In the meantime, our ability to exchange important data on Covid-19 with Europe will have the compliance priorities of EU knowledge coverage officers.
Fisher: That’s not encouraging. Well, now, what can other people do to themselves? It is estimated that at least 42% of the U.S. workforce He works from home full-time. Especially for small and medium-sized businesses in the U.S., what are the main disruptions with workers fleeing home and what employers and workers can do themselves?
Cunningham: With cybersecurity, as with all things, a chain is as strong as its weakest link. Malicious cyber actors will search the Internet for newly created staff from home who are frustrated, for example, with the VPN they should use and will therefore reduce prices, which will weaken their own protection and that of their employer. This applies to both our largest corporations and small and medium-sized enterprises. Even with limited budgets, small and medium-sized enterprises can do some undeniable things to, in particular, their security and that of their staff: first, and most importantly, they require multifactor authentication not only on corporate accounts and applications, but also on staff. “Non-public devices and accounts that are attached to the company’s infrastructure. Second, they do not allow access to the enterprise infrastructure, unless it is through a VPN. Finally, training, training, training. No other measure will protect staff from cyber-dicy. Train and verify that your staff never click on untrusted links or move the budget without the phone permission of someone they know, and do not access harmful or suspicious Internet sites (such as pornographic or gaming sites) on a device connected to the company’s infrastructure.
Dr. Nicole Fisher is the founder and president of Health Human Rights Strategies, a human rights and physical care consulting firm in Washington, D.C. It’s a
Dr. Nicole Fisher is the discoverer and president of Health Human Rights Strategies, a human rights and fitness care consulting firm in Washington, DC. She is also a global fitness policy advisor on Capitol Hill and an expert in innovation, generation and brain conditioning, mainly because they have an effect on vulnerable populations. Fisher helps Forbes contextualize fitness and highlight ideas, businesses and others that are transforming the fitness landscape. It also hosts a series of dinners abroad, “A Seat at the Table,” which brings together combined opinion leaders for informal discussions to advance research, politics, and planning. His writings have been published in magazines and publications, and his presentations can be found on the United Nations online page and in various media and media. Fisher holds a doctorate in public aptitude from the University of North Carolina, a master’s degree in public policy from the University of Chicago, and a bachelor’s degree from the University of Missouri.