A government website long used to supply the latest rules on how to care for CoVID-19, as well as data on how to obtain tests, vaccines, and remedies have now been superseded through a page that proclaimed the virus to emerge from a lab in Wuhan, China, and that Anthony Fauci, the management of the license and others have been running to the hilt.
The website, Covid. gov, now opens with a banner that reads “Lab Fair, the True Origins of Covid-19,” with a symbol of President Trump walking between the words “lab” and “leak. “
advertising
It continues, after the directory, various claims about the origins of Covid and bringing President Biden’s pardon of Fauci, to address a diversity of other right-wing considerations about the pandemic, around social distancing, mask mandates, lockdowns, former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo on nursing homes
“Public fitness officials induce other American people through mixed messages, knee-jerk reactions, and lack of transparency,” he concludes in a segment titled Covid-19 Information. “More overtly, the federal government demonized choice remedies and private accounts, such as lab leaks, in a shameful effort to force and control the fitness decisions of other Americans. “
The theory of laboratory leaks, debated in duration for more than five years, had the cause of law.
advertising
Many Republicans argue that the former leaders of the National Health Institutes suppressed the discussion of the theory: Forbidden Facebook publications that sell the concept of laboratory escape in February 2020, the first Trump administration, one of the complaints that then helped boost Trump’s victory in the 2024 elections.
The new website, in a site that had ever provided fundamental information of public aptitude, is the new effort of Trump’s new secretary and aptitude, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , to remodel the country’s public physical conditioning agencies. The “alternative treatments” seem to be a reference to drugs such as Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine that Kennedy and others favored after primary studies had shown that they were ineffective.
Covid. gov is now being redirected to Whitehouse. gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-Tavid-19. Covid-19 advice, adding tests, remedies and Long Covid, can still be discovered in https://www. cdc. gov/covid.
The concept that COVVI -19 arose from a laboratory, and not in a problem of a rainy market or elsewhere, has received its help in the beyond two years. It was the theme of a republican report of the Chamber in 2024, as well as press articles in Vanity Fair, The New York Times and Propublic, among other sales issues. The Federal Research Office, the Ministry of Energy and the Central Intelligence Agency, each concluded that a laboratory escape was the maximum of maximum origin, the main problems of their analysis were not made public in large part and that they did not exclude alternatives.
However, many scientists still point to the spill as the maximum theory of origin, pointing to a diversity of results. This includes evidence that it potentially releases the coronavirus to raccoon dogs in the Hunan rainy market; These first instances were grouped in the market; This genetic evidence suggests that the virus only emerged in the past of 2019.
“I would simply like the entire brand,” said Angie Rasmussen, a researcher at the organization of infectious vaccines and diseases at Saskatchewan University in Saskatoon, Canada, who studies emerging viruses and has gathered vocally for zoonotic overflow as the maximum cause probably. “It is a triumph of graphic design, but the maximum of those problems is not correct. “
advertising
“I don’t know what to say,” adds Kristian Andersen, a virologist at Scripps Research, who co -written a first article, now strongly criticized through the supporters of the laboratory escape, pleading with zoonotic origin. “In fact, almost everything is, I don’t think a component is correct. “
For those who have argued for years that not only the virus has been revealed from a laboratory, but created in one through a functional gain called like this, the website considered that a justification. Richard Ebright, Rutgers Microbiology professor, said the site argues that this was done with federal dollars granted to a non -profit organization.
“All these things are true,” Ebright said on the page, saying that the evidence is “only circumstantial since there is no confession and that there are no videos. “
Rasmussen, however, said his considerations went beyond the argument about the origins of Covid. In his attack granted against robots, fitness and humans and NIH, he has noticed an attempt to justify the restructuring of US public fitness agencies and the radical cuts that management is now doing public aptitude and biomedical research.
“I think the most is that other people perceive the purpose of this document,” he said. “It’s not to get to the true origins of Covid-19. ”
Understand how science, fitness policy, and medicine shape the global every day and every day
Sharing options
Health and Medicine Frontiers Report
Company
Account
More