How seriously does Dr. Li-Meng Yan take?And how seriously are the characteristics of the sars-CoV2 genome that suggest a complicated laboratory amendment that the herbal evolution and delineation of its likely artificial route, published through it and its co-authors, under the aegis of the Rule of Law Society and the Rule of Law Foundation, New York, on September 14th?As the name suggests, the document states that the coronavirus was created by man in a laboratory.
The article was uploaded to the OPEN source Zenodo study repository, controlled through CERN, and reported via the Hindustan Times on Wednesday (bit. ly/33uFyy4). from a television screen presented through a British television channel, in which she said the same thing, without any of the unsubstantiated clinical arguments presented in the article.
Here’s what it says:
One, ZC45, a bat virus, or a very similar variant or mutant, bears a striking similarity to Sars-CoV2, as shown through genome sequencing, with a similarity of 94% to 100% of key viral proteins.
The complex protein Sars-CoV2 is necessarily a trimer (necessarily 3 components) of which it has an S1 and S2 component with a furine excision site on the boundary between the two. Other studies have already established that the human cell enzyme furine cracks or ruptures, S1 and S2 are established at the excision site, and that the S1 unit then joins the ACE receptor, some other protein discovered on the surface of the maximum human cells, which facilitates the access of viral protein to human cells. the virus’s ability to bind to the receptor and the presence of the excision site that responds to a canonical human enzyme are the reasons why Covid-19 is as infectious as it is.
Click here for complete information on the Covid-19 pandemic
The goal of furine excision and the ability to bind complex protein with ACE2 receptor are natural, according to the article.
In their preface to this clinical speculation, the authors also state that the procedure for creating such a virus in the laboratory can take only six months and they are requesting additional studies and research on the origin of the virus, even if their speculation proves it. to be later, it is a tip that no one can dispute: we will have to investigate the origin of the virus, not so much to blame (although there are also any), even to prepare for the next virus and the next pandemic.
Dr. Yan, recently in the United States, where she took refuge last April, is a pathologist who has in the past worked at the University of Hong Kong School of Public Health and has long maintained that China is aware of the virus and the fact that human-to-human transmission of infection occurred long before it occurred. His claims about the human-caused virus are newer.
Interestingly, a March article in Nature titled The Proximal Origin of Sars-Cov2, written through Kristian G Andersen of the Scripps Research Institute in California, argued, supporting the same two unique features of Sars-CoV2, that the virus was natural. The protein showed a strong “affinity” to bind to the receptor, they said, but this interaction was neither “ideal” nor “optimal”. In other words, this meant that if someone had set out to design the virus, they would have selected the “ideal” binding relationship, not just an optimal one. The document also stated that there were other coronaviruses that had similar “excision sites” and that this was not unique to Sars-CoV2.
However, the two articles differ in a vital respect. According to the one published in Nature, “genetic knowledge irrefutably demonstrates that Sars-CoV2 is not derived from any viral skeleton used in the past. “Yan stated (again, without justification) that an “genomic series analysis shows that ZC45, or a very similar bat coronavirus, is the skeleton used in the creation of Sars-CoV2. “
Read “More than 5,000 Indians died in West and East Asian countries amid the Covid-19 pandemic”: government informs Parliament
Dr. Yan’s claims are also perceived from a political perspective, and U. S. scientists point out that the two nonprofits that published the document were similar to Steve Bannon, a former Trump alessor and former executive chairman of the far-right Breitbart News, criticizing the study’s findings. .
Clearly, only additional studies and research can shed light on the origin of the virus, which has inflamed 29,927,685 and killed 942,564 worldwide. India ended Wednesday with 5,115,846 cases and 83,230 deaths.
But as Vivek Wadhwa, columnist for this article, said, a wonderful generation philosopher and prominent member of Harvard Law School’s Work and Professional Life program in a recent article in Foreign Policy: very well to waste the next one. “Genetic engineering, with all its perspectives of intelligence and evil, has become democratized,” Wadhwa wrote.
“Thanks to a technological revolution in genetic engineering, all the equipment needed to create a virus is so cheap, undeniable and easy to get that any dishonest scientist or university biohacker can use them.
“item. title”