While contemplating how to minimize the threat of exposure to covid-19, i. e. in the coming winter months, experts have discovered the 3 most dangerous places to pass in any city and the safest tactics to travel, by opting for the plane, exercise. and car.
Anthony Fauci, M. D. , director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, told MSNBC that there are 3 places where the threat of infection is much greater than: bars, restaurants and gyms.
The figure comes from a recent review through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) that found that others who had visited a bar in the past two weeks were more likely to test positive for Covid-19 than those that tested negative. .
People who tested positive were also more likely to have gone to a gym, but as Self reported, the difference isn’t that big.
The reasoning is that when you’re in those places, you’re more likely to be inside and less likely to wear a mask. If other people stay longer and more people are present, the threat increases further.
The threat is obviously greater if those bars, restaurants and gyms are in communities with the highest infection rates.
Dr. Fauci said that “bars are a vital position for the infection to spread. There’s no doubt about it. And this becomes especially vital if you are in a domain where the network is widespread. “
Of course, cost, distance, and availability have a role to play in choosing how to travel, however, the following issues describe some of the pros and cons of air, exercise, and car travel when all other points are the same.
Aircraft – The threat begins at the airport, so the length of queues, the way the airport handles check-in, and its use of the smart generation will play a key role, so there is no undeniable answer; Airports should be analyzed on a case-by-case basis based on the degree of contactless systems in place.
Regardless of reviews on the use of biometric knowledge in passports, airports that use facial popularity can be much safer than others. Dallas Fort Worth, for example, has become the busiest airport in the global pandemic and has tested many smart technologies. such as non-contact toilets, contactless recording systems and ultraviolet generation to kill germs.
New studies recommend that Covid-19 be transmissible on flights when in the past high-tech airflow systems were believed not to make this possible.
The effect could also depend on individual airlines and whether they keep seats free in the surrounding area. Arnold Barnett, a professor of statistics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, found in one study that “the threat of getting COVID-19 from a nearby passenger is about 1 in 4300. “On aircraft with locked intermediate seats, this threat is reduced to approximately 1 in 7,700”.
This means that, as Condé Nast Traveler reports, Covid-19-related mortality threats on an airplane are now “significantly higher” than the threat from a plane crash.
Train: Many platforms and stations are inherently less safe because many are outdoors or at least allow for freer air circulation. Boarding is also much more extensive as passengers have doors to get in and out, which is not the case on a plane.
However, once on the train, studies show that the detail of the threat is clearly related to the proximity you sit with a user with Covid-19, Amtrak passengers have credit in the air that there is no central seat. Clearly, they play an important role: anything that is taken into account in the decision-making process.
Jim Mathews, president and CHIEF executive of the Rail Passengers Association, said that “an Amtrak coach adjusts the air between 12 and 15 times depending on the time and supplies 15 pounds of new air according to the minutes according to the passenger. “It also limits the dangers of imposing social distance and dressing up as masks.
Automobile: The apparent merit is that driving force controls who goes in and out, and where, assuming it’s not a rental car, but driving forces want to take breaks and cars want them met, so decisions can play a bigger role. In the case of rental cars, all major suppliers have promised advanced sanitation standards to ensure some safety.
So which one’s the best?
Barnet, the MIT professor, continued his examination to discuss the difference in protection between air and the road and concluded that cars had the advantage. While the threat of mortality, even for safe drivers, increases over longer distances, the mortality rate can still be expected. statistically declining for passengers in cars.
He said that “the merit of the massive protection of flying 1,000 non-stop miles to drive, before COVID, disappeared in August 2020. “
Most experts agree that the exercise is a little more advanced than airArray even if the car is the safest.
Condé Nast Traveller offers some helpful tips when you’re on the go, no matter what means of transportation you use, especially on early-day departures if you’re using public transportation, so they’re cooler to disinfect at night. it also advises on washing “contact points” in rental cars or in airplane/train seats such as armrests, mirrors, radio controls, seat backrests, trays, seat belts, vents, blinds, lighting controls, etc.