Covid-19 Live Updates: New York spends a month with a positivity of less than 1%

Advertisement

Supported by

Governor Andrew M.Cuomo announced the figure when he and the experts suggested caution at Labor Day celebrations.A university known for its studies on the virus warns its scientists that they oppose suspicious packages.

now i

Israel has announced a curfew in dozens of villages and villages severely affected by the virus.

The percentage of viral tests that tested positive in New York State remained below 1% for 30 consecutive days, suggesting that the state’s competitive technique to contain its epidemic, once the highest serious in the country, has largely worked.

The rate of state positivity, announced on Sunday, remained below 1%, parts of the economy gradually reset, the number of others examined continued to increase, and other states dealt with a sharp increase in the number of cases.

But despite all the encouragement presented through the one-month marker, many New Yorkers remain concerned as autumn and winter approach as the number of cases increases as the country’s largest public school district and more businesses prepare to reopen.

Even Governor Andrew M.Cuomo, in pronouncing the figure, took the opportunity to urge no birthday party but moderation, emphasizing New York’s reopening technique – slower and more controlled than at most other states – as well as his mandate mask.

“Caution is a virtue, a vice, ” said Mr. Cuomo.

The state of New York has lately recorded an average of just over 700 instances consistent with the day, according to a New York Times database, a little over six hundred at the end of August, but still a fraction of the 9,000 to 10,000 instances daily it reported on its April peak.The number of others in hospitals due to the virus was reduced to 410 on Saturday, the lowest number since March 16.

The governor’s announcement came in the middle of a festive weekend that, like others before him, will surely tempt many others to meet socially as summer progresses.Cuomo warned that the state’s achievements can be threatened by any reversal of precautions, such as dressing in masks and social estating.

“Our movements today the infection rate tomorrow,” he said.”As the hard work weekend continues, I urge everyone to be smart, so we don’t see an increase in the coming weeks.”

A recent outbreak at New York State University in Oneonta, a public school in central New York, has shown how quickly new groups can burst.

After some academics organized major parties, more than 500 academics tested positive; officials canceled in-person training during the semester less than two weeks after it started, closed the dormitories and sent the students home.

On Sunday, Cuomo said a state immediate detection team sent to the city of Oneonta had discovered 91 more cases, most commonly among college-age adults.

Senator Kamala Harris of California, the Democratic vice presidential candidate, said she would not accept President Trump’s assurances that a coronavirus vaccine was safe and would wait for medical experts to verify that the vaccine was reliable before receiving a vaccine..

“I don’t take the floor,” Harris said of Trump on CNN’s “Inside Politics.”

“He needs us to inject him with bleach,” he added, referring to comments in April when the president incomprehensibly recommended a harmful remedy for coronavirus.

Harris’ comments came after federal officials alerted state and major public fitness agencies last week to prepare to distribute a vaccine to fitness personnel and other high-risk equipment starting in October or early November.ended the kind of large-scale human trials that can result in efficacy and safety, this delay has greater fears that the Trump administration will anticipate the deployment of the vaccine by Election Day on November 3.

For months, Harris and Joseph R.Biden Jr. assaulted Trump for his handling of the coronavirus crisis.Harris’ comments Sunday on the question of a possible vaccine, while scientists running for a vaccine report on the constant strain of a White House concerned about smart news, are likely to sow additional skepticism among Americans about whether to get vaccinated when it becomes available.

With growing fears about the politicization of vaccines and treatments, five pharmaceutical corporations are preparing to factor this week and are committed not to launch a vaccine unless it meets strict efficacy and safety criteria.Companies: Pfizer, Modern, Johnson

Harris also said Sunday that she and Biden would set a national “standard” to dress in a mask, without passing a court order.

“This is not a punishment. He is not an older brother,” Harris said, adding that dressing up in a mask is a “sacrifice” in times of crisis.

Her comments seemed to soften the position she and Biden had played in the past.

Last month, Biden and Harris called for Americans to be required to wear masks, and told reporters after receiving a briefing from public fitness experts that each and every American wears an outdoor mask for at least 3 months and that all governors require the mask to be worn.

In July, Biden warned that if he were president, he would require a mask to be used in public, and asked if he could use “federal influence to impose that,” he said it could be fair and “from the executive’s point of view.””

A look at all the vaccines that have come to human trials.

In recent weeks, a Harvard scientist has been made headlines for an ambitious concept aimed at reducing the spread of the virus: the deployment of antigenic tests, a decades-old outsider in testing technology, to tens of millions of Americans for almost every day., for -Use at home.

These tests are not very smart to detect low-level infections, but they are reasonable and convenient, and give effects in minutes.Real-time information, argued by Dr. Michael Mina, a Harvard scientist, would be greater than the long delays blocking the line of evidence..

The immediate and common technique has attracted the attention of scientists and journalists from all over the world, as well as senior officials from the Department of Health and Human Services.

But more than a dozen experts have said that almost ubiquitous antigen tests, although intriguing in theory, would possibly not be effective in practice.In addition to posing massive logistical hurdle, they said, the plan is based on broad compliance and others who are increasingly disappointed by coronavirus testing.The purpose also assumes that immediate testing can achieve its purpose.

“We are in a position to think outdoors and propose new tactics to manage this pandemic,” said Esther Babady, director of clinical microbiology at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York City.But he said antigenic testing may simply have not yet entered the market.

Moreover, no rigorous study has shown that common evidence is more delicate but slower in the genuine world, he said.”Knowledge for this is what is missing.”

What has been advanced on this technique is “largely ambitious, and we want to compare it to reality,” said Dr. Alexander McAdam, director of the Infectious Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Boston Children’s Hospital and a recent report on a pandemic.Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

Most viral tests to date are based on a lab strategy called PCR, long popular gold because it can capture even small amounts of genetic clothing from germs like coronavirus.

But chain-of-origin spraying has compromised efforts to collect, send, and process samples for PCR testing, lengthening response times.And the longer the wait, the lower the result.

Advertisement

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *