advertising
Supported by
Florida lifts restrictions on state restaurants as it re-enters and Israel imposes new limits on foreign travel.
Now
Technology stocks rose Wall Street, but the dow Jones trading average and the S
Less than 10% of Americans have antibodies to the new coronavirus, suggesting that there is even less collective immunity to disease than previously estimated, according to a study published Friday in The Lancet.
Blood samples analyzed from 28,500 dialysis patients in 46 states, the first research of its kind nationwide.
The effects coincided more or less with research published next week through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which found that about 10% of blood samples from sites across the country contained antibodies to the virus.
Dr. Robert R. Redfield, director of the C. D. C. , referring to this investigation when he told a congressional committee this week that 90% of all Americans were still vulnerable to the virus, said a C. D. C. , the spokeswoman.
An accurate estimate of the country’s immunity is vital because President Trump, in collaboration with his new medical adviser, Dr. Scott Atlas, has tentatively promoted the concept of achieving herd immunity through the lifting of lockdowns, campaigns mask use and social distancing mandates. It would be to let the virus invade the population while looking for those who are considered most vulnerable.
Most public fitness experts say such a policy would result in thousands more deaths because it is to protect all older Americans or those with one of the dozens of underlying conditions, in addition to diabetes and central disease, that make a user more likely. sick or die.
The dialysis patient examination by scientists at Stanford University and published in The Lancet.
He discovered diversifications in antibody grades across the country: in the New York metropolitan area, adding New Jersey, antibody grades were greater than 25% of the samples analyzed; in the western United States, they were less than 5%.
Overall, the researchers estimated it at approximately 9. 3%.
Dialysis patients are necessarily representative of the entire population, and the test is just one of many attempts to reach an accurate estimate of seroprevalence.
The C. D. C. study, which has not yet been published, described through a C. D. C. spokesperson. The control referred to blood sample analysis from 52 advertising laboratories between early July and mid-August in all 50 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Based on 46 sites with maximum data, C. D. C. , the researchers concluded that the overall national prevalence rate below 10 is consistent with the percentage. The prevalence rate accounted for between less than 1% in some states and approximately 22. 5% in New York State.
The implication of antibody studies, Dr. Redfield said in a statement, is that the vast majority of Americans are still vulnerable to the virus and therefore deserve to continue taking steps such as dressing in masks, staying two feet away from other people, washing their hands. hands, stay home when in poor health and “be wise among the crowd. “
transcript
In the state of Florida, today we are entering what we originally called phase 3, and what that will mean for restaurants is that there will be no limitations on the state of Florida component. In fact, we are also aware of the desire for advertising certainty. There have been local closures and other types of restrictions. So the order I sign today will keep the restaurants running, it won’t allow closures. They can participate at least 50% regardless of the local rule. And then if the local is restricting between 50 and 100, you have to provide the justification and you have to identify what the prices are involved. And if it comes back in March, they’ve told us 15 days to reduce the spread. So that was – in Florida, we followed it. We have followed this. There were no restaurants, bars, gyms, or elective procedures, some of those things. And then they said, well, you know what, we wish for another 30 days. So 30 days to stop the spread. So we did it too. And yet some say, well, you can never do, you just know, what you want to do, until there is a vaccine. Well, we don’t know, but now other people are saying, hey, even if there is a vaccine, it will be another year before you can serve properly. And you know, I don’t think that’s viable. I don’t think this is acceptable. So I think it will be very, very vital for the industry.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis lifted state restrictions on restaurants and many other businesses on Friday as the state enters the next reopening.
DeSantis, a Republican and staunch supporter of President Trump who spoke at the president’s rally in Jacksonville on Thursday, signed the order, allowing restaurants and many other businesses to run at full capacity starting with Phase 3 of his reopening plan. administration.
“We are definitive for the future,” the governor said at a news convention in St. Petersburg.
County governments can restrict capacity to more than 50 percent, Mr. DeSantis, a new restriction on local control.
“I think it will be very, very much for the industry,” DeSantis said, calling the wholesale closure of restaurants specific to unacceptable. “You can’t say no after six months and just have other people writhing in the wind. “
DeSantis refused to make it mandatory to wear the mask in the state and insisted that the resolution be left to local governments. However, his administration has increasingly intervened to prevent counties from imposing stricter viral restrictions. Many of Florida’s largest counties are governed. through democrats.
In a statement, state Democratic Party President Terrie Rizzo questioned the fact that DeSantis prevents local governments from “taking evidence-based action in their communities. “
“We all desperately need things back to normal, but that can’t happen when DeSantis and Trump don’t have a plan to get us out of this public fitness crisis,” he said.
As a component of the state’s reopening plan, Phase 3 allows bars and nightclubs to operate at full capacity “with limited social estating protocols. “It was not transparent without delay how the order would be applied to Miami-Dade County, the county virus, which has kept bars and nightclubs closed since March. The county mayor had stated that he hoped to authorize secure operations with restrictions such as table-only service; The governor’s order prohibits the closure of any business.
The order also gave the impression that other local restrictions, such as masking orders and curfews, were largely innocent in postponing the collection of individual fines and other consequences for violating virus restrictions.
Cases have particularly dropped in the state after a strong buildup in the summer. The governor proposed the fact that Florida was able to get out of the peak without imposing a blockade as evidence that business closures are not thought to be to involve Jason Mahon, a spokesman for Florida’s Emergency Management Division, which operates state-run control sites, says sites have a lot of capacity, but fewer people are being reviewed. Tests are also carried out at municipalities, federal and personal sites.
On Thursday, Florida was verifying 38% of a verification target developed through researchers at the Harvard Global Health Institute, which measures the minimum number of controls needed to mitigate the disease. processed thursday’s two-week era, according to the knowledge analyzed through The Times. Positive titles deserve to be below or equivalent to 5% for at least 14 days before a state or country can safely reopen, according to the World Health Organization.
Visits to the virus-related emergency departments peaked in early July and hospitalizations on July 21, he said. DeSantis. On Friday, Florida added more than 2,800 new cases and new deaths. In total, the state has recorded more than 695,000 cases and more than 13,900 deaths, according to a Times database.
If a county needs to restrict the ability of places to eat between 50 and one hundred percent, Mr. DeSantis, it will have to provide a justification to the state.
“The concept that dictates this is bigger than them to make decisions so that their customers have confidence, I think it’s misconseconded,” he said.
Other states have noticed conflicts between governors and municipal leaders seeking to impose restrictions beyond what their states call fored. In Georgia, Gov. Brian Kemp, a Republican, filed a lawsuit in mid-July against the mayor of Atlanta, a Democrat who sought to ask for a mask in public. Kemp withdrew his complaint.
In Arizona, Gov. Doug Ducey, a Republican, first resisted the approval of local governments to factor their own mask guarantees, but reversed that position in June in reaction to the tension of mayors of Arizona’s largest cities.
Advertising