Li-Meng Yan, the Chinese virologist who went into hiding in the United States after stating that the Chinese government was not only aware of the new coronavirus long before the first cases were officially reported in Wuhan last December, but also reported that Covid-19 was created in a laboratory of the Chinese army, published with his study team a 26-page document in which he summarized his theory that the pandemic that plagues the world is not natural.
Yan and his team published their findings on Zenodo in a report entitled “Unusual features of sarS CoV-2 genome suggesting a complicated laboratory amendment that an herbal evolution and delineation of its likely artificial path”.
The text is co-written by Chinese scientists Shu Kang, Jie Guan and Shanchang Hu and published under the Rule of Law Society
China and the World Health Organization (WHO) have refuted Dr. Yan’s theories that the new coronavirus is not local in nature, and said he had no record of a contractor named Lee Poon whom Yan claims to have alerted earlier about the immediate spread of the virus. publicly acknowledged, while the Chinese government has consistently stated that Covid-19 jumped from a host animal, probably a bat, at a rainy market in Wuhan.
In addition, a report published in WordsSideKick. com at the beginning of the pandemic in March stated that the theory of artificial progression may simply “get into bed,” bringing a study paper published in Nature Medicine that states that the new coronavirus had mutated. in such a way that it would be impossible to design in a laboratory.
In its summary, the report states that “the SARS-CoV-2 genomic series has undergone genetic engineering,” in which the virus has acquired the ability to target humans with greater virulence and infectiousness. “
The report states that the new coronavirus has been adapted through herbal coronaviruses already known in bats through the Chinese army.
Below are “three lines of evidence” that Dr. Yan and his team say show that Covid-19 is a virus in the lab.
The first of these states: “The genomic series of SARS-CoV-2 is disturbingly similar to that of a bat coronavirus discovered through the army laboratories of the Third University of Military Medicine (Chongqing, China) and the Nanjing Command Medical Research Institute (Nanjing, China). “
The current line of evidence goes on to read: “The tendency to binding to the receptor (RBM) in the SPS-CoV-2 spike protein, which determines the specificity of the virus host, is similar to that of SARS-CoV from the 2003 outbreak in a suspicious way. Genomic evidence suggests that RBM manipulated genetically.
The third discovery presented through Yan and his team states: “SARS-CoV-2 comprises an exclusive furine excision site in its Spike protein, which is known for its specific viral infectiousness and cell tropism. However, this excision site is absolutely absent in this elegance of coronaviruses discovered in nature. In addition, the rare codons related to this additional series recommend the strong option that this furine excision site is not the product of herbal evolution and may have been artificially inserted into the SARS-CoV-2 genome using techniques other than undeniable serial occasions or multiple recombination of strains within co-infected tissues or animal crops».
In summary, Yan and his team recommend that the new coronavirus has evolved “as a laboratory product created by the bat coronaviruses ZC45 and / or ZXC21 as style and / or backbone. “
The report states that “ZC45 and ZXC21 were discovered between July 2015 and February 2017 and remote and characterized through the above-mentioned army study laboratories. “It also indicates that when a non-army laboratory, the Shanghai Clinical Center for Public Health, published a Nature article reporting “close and conflicting phylogenetic dating between SARS-CoV-2 and ZC45/ZXC2 that RaTG13, was temporarily closed for rectification. ‘ “
The report also accuses several publications of yielding to political tension or experiencing “conflicts of interest” so as not to publish other effects of herbal origin theory. ‘Existing clinical publications supporting a theory of herbal origin rely heavily on a single piece of evidence – in the past it discovered bat coronavirus called RaTG13, which has a 96% nucleotide serial identity with SARS-CoV-2,” the report says.