Could Covid-19 be a “point of change”?- Joe O’Donnell

Nicola Sturgeon warns Scotland could face a possible blockade in winter

Boris Johnson joins LinkedIn amid Downing St exit

Feedback

The UK’s relations with China are deteriorating due to considerations of Hong Kong’s independence, human rights violations and Huawei’s role in deploying 5G in the UK.But what do these and other diplomatic adjustments mean for rail freight transport?

China National Railway reports that 2,920 trains ran between China and Europe from January to April 2020, an increase of 24% year-on-year, but since then Covid-19 has wreaked havoc on advertising volumes and grades of service have declined. that additional diplomatic turmoil or a continuing lockdown trend will mean a further drop in shipping from China. This can be exacerbated by developing environmental considerations about the manufacture of items in one aspect of the world, then through their shipment to the other, and through the preference to rebuild or relocate jobs in a recession caused by Covid-19, in Altogether, this can alter the advertising structures of the last decades.

That’s just one of the dangers. But even at this harmful “point of change,” it’s very likely that some things will remain the same.We will continue to be an urbanized country in an urbanized world.The country’s core infrastructure (ports, road and rail networks) will continue to exist and continue to import and export goods.Scotland plays a vital role in exports, however, it relies primarily on effective industrial routes and infrastructure to ensure that its goods can succeed in the market profitably.

These fundamental facts deserve to be concentrated where we seek opportunities. For rail freight transport and the reduction of maritime transport emissions, one of the maximum vital opportunities are free ports.The Rail Transport Group recently responded to the Westminster government’s freeport consultation, which will see up to ten Freeports centres for global industry and investment, encouraging regeneration and job creation and creating pockets of innovation.

Freeport’s prestige sites are likely to gain significant investment advantages and tax advantages, resulting in particularly high load movements.The Westminster government needs the opportunity to apply this to the UK as a whole, however, since much of the policy is decentralised.”will work with decentralized administrations such as Scotland to expand separate allocation and governance processes.”

The RFG argued that to ensure that this flagship policy creates the longest-term imaginable for the UK, national rail sites deserve to be able to apply for Freeport status, either alone or as a component of a joint offer with a seaport, to ensure that a giant component of the country imaginable can access taxes and other benefits; however, this deserves to be combined with strong protections to make certain loose ports create new business rather than simply encouraging businesses to leave their existing locations.Only ports in the north of England become loose ports where Scottish ports do not distort trade?

Free port offerings with smart rail access deserve to be prioritized to minimize carbon emissions from the large volume of new cargo movements that would possibly be generated. Free ports offer a major opportunity to invest in cutting-edge concepts on how to advance the transportation of low-carbon goods.that can also be deployed across the country.But, of course, it’s not just the ports that want investment.An electrified rail network deserves to finally link them to the rest of the country to maximize its prospective effect as ecological charging centers.Excellent shipping links to Scottish and cross-border ports, with forward main lines on the east and west coasts, would be transformative.It would be strange if the frank ports and accompanying investments were not a component of a green recovery for decarbonisation and to help the UK’s shipping sector achieve net zero.

Unfortunately, this investment was absent in the Chancellor’s recent speech in which he delivered an “employment plan” for the recovery of 30 billion pounds post-Covid.If measures are needed for the energy power of the houses, it is disappointing that the discourse does not mention the railway.it is the sector of the economy with the highest carbon emissions, however, it has only been discussed in the context of larger roads.The Scottish government deserves to deal effectively with the many crises we face.

Joe O’Donnell, Policy Manager, Rail Freight Group

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *