Coronavirus tests: Swabs don’t damage the brain and other claims fact-checked

We analyze claims in some of the widely shared maximum publications.

A photo showing a swab circulated widely on Facebook and Instagram, with accusations that the swab was taken in the “blood brain barrier.”

The concept that it can only be the blood brain barrier through a pattern in the nose is a false impression of what it is and how it works.

The brain has many layers of protection. The skull is the first and the apparent maximum, and the brain is additionally enclosed in a protective membrane and a fluid.

In the blood vessels that line the brain, the blood brain barrier is a very compact layer of cells that prevents molecules circulating in the blood from passing through the brain, while allowing things like oxygen and nutrients.

A stick inserted into the nose pierces several layers of tissue and pierces a bone and blood vessels to succeed in the blood brain barrier.

“The swab succeeds in the blood brain barrier without a significant force breaking several layers of tissue and bone. We don’t discover Covid swab headaches in our neurology practice,” says Dr Liz Coulthard, a member of the British Neuroscience Association (BNA) committee.

The nasopharyngeal swab verifies the presence of coronavirus in the back of the nasal passage and is a component of one of the swab techniques.

A combined nose and throat pattern is used to verify Covid-19 in the UK.

“I have stamped many patients while running in the hospital and also took those samples of myself every week as a volunteer in a trial. It’s about having something up your nose: the swab can cause itching or tingling, however, it shouldn’t be painful,” says Dr. Tom Wingfield of Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine.

False accusations began to appear on U.S.-based Facebook accounts. On July 6, and some versions come with calls to opt out of testing.

Some of them were deemed “fake” through data verification organizations on Facebook.

We discovered the same chart in Romanian, French, Dutch and Portuguese publications, generating thousands of commitments.

Reports of infected kits have been misunderstood as implying that doing a coronavirus will give you a coronavirus.

In fact, headlines shared about contamination refer to a report on ineffective tests caused by sloppy lab practices at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) early in the pandemic. This doesn’t mean that being tested will give you the virus.

In a post shared more than 3,000 times on Facebook this week, a fan page for Fox News host Tucker Carlson shared a news article about contaminated test kits saying: “You want Covid-19? This is how U get it!”

The full Washington Post article, published in June, highlights the findings of a federal journal that found that lab controls and procedures were delayed by the deployment of the CDC’s control program. This does not recommend that faulty verification kits may have transmitted the virus to patients.

The article is a paid wall, which means that most people who view posts that share the article would read the name out of context.

Fact-checkers in the United States and India have refuted more far-fetched claims that coronavirus control is a Gates Foundation-funded conspiracy to implant a microchip in patients. These false statements, shared thousands of times on Facebook, are similar to the conspiracy theories we’ve discussed in the past about a sinister microchip program connected to a possible vaccine.

There is no evidence to suggest there is any micro-chipping programme linked to the coronavirus pandemic and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has denied the claims.

A meme asking, “If Covid was really carried on your breath, why can’t you just breathe on the swab? Why do they have to shove the swab to the very back of your nose?” has been engaged with at least 7,000 times on Facebook and Instagram.

Coronavirus spreads when an inflamed user coughs or sneezes small droplets (full of viruses) in the air. This means that just breathing with a swab would gather enough apparatus to perform a lab test.

We spoke to Public Health England, who said that taking a pattern from the nose or throat provides more accurate verification results.

If you breathe only with a thin swab head, you may not catch the viral debris or cells that produce the virus. However, if you insert the swab into your nose and throat and rotate it at the time of infection, you’re more likely to have infectious curtains that will give a result.

Finally, we observe the under developing scandal in Bangladesh of fake certificate indicating that a user has a coronavirus.

Several others were arrested for issuing false documents that appeared negative verification effects to others who were not verified.

These documents are valuable because migrants demand them to be virus-free when they arrive at their destination. Bangladesh relies heavily on the gains of its citizens running abroad.

In the most recent incident, a hospital owner, accused of falsting thousands of evidence, was arrested after a nine-day manhunt near the Indian border disguised as a woman.

Criminal gangs are also putting adverts on social media to find potential buyers.

Surprisingly, false certificates indicating evidence would also be on sale in Bangladesh, giving officials the opportunity to take a leave of absence.

Additional reports through Olga Robinson and Shayan Sardarizadeh.

Learn about reality control

Send us your questions

Follow us on Twitter

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *