Coronavirus screening in the United States is declining even as infections remain high and the number of deaths rises to more than 1,000 per day, a disturbing trend that officials largely characterize americans’ discouragements of having to wait hours for a check and weeks to locate the results.
An analysis through The Associated Press found that the number of tests consistent with the day has fallen from 3.6% in the last two weeks to 750,000, and the number was reduced in 22 states. This includes places like Alabama, Mississippi, Missouri and Iowa where the % positive test age is higher and continues to rise, an indicator that the virus is still spreading unchecked.
In the midst of the crisis, some fitness officials are calling for the advent of another type of verification that would produce effects in minutes and would be reasonable and sufficient enough for millions of Americans to review themselves, but also less accurate.
“There’s a sense of depression that we want to do anything else,” said Dr. Ashish Jha, director of Harvard’s Global Health Institute.
Widespread testing is essential to engage the epidemic as the United States approaches a gigantic five million infections and more than 1 to 7,000 deaths of more than 700,000 worldwide.
Demand for testing is expected to increase this fall, when schools reopen and flu season begins, the maximum is likely to exceed materials and lead to additional delays and bottlenecks.
Part of the drop in testing in the last expected weeks after expired advertising labs suggested that doctors focus on the maximum risk of their patients. But some fitness officials and government officials see the development of public frustration and declining demand.
In Iowa, state officials say they are less interested in checking, despite the abundant supply. The state’s check rate peaked in mid-July, but has fallen 40% in the last two weeks.
“We have the capacity. Iowans just wants to take the test,” Gov. Kim Reynolds said last week.
Jessica Moore of rural Newberry, South Carolina, said that after a private lab lost her Covid-19 test results in mid-July, she had to get re-tested at a pop-up site organised by the state.
Moore and her husband arrived early on a Saturday morning at the site, a network center, where they waited two hours for their trial. Moore looked through the rearview mirror as other people were driving, saw the long line of cars, then turned around and left.
“If other people have something to do on a Saturday and need to be tested, they might not wait two hours in the Heat of South Carolina for a test, especially if they’re not symptomatic,” Moore said.
Before traveling from Florida to Delaware last month, Laura DuBose Schumacher signed up to spend a car check in Orlando with her husband. They had a time window to get there.
They got there at the start of the window, but after 50 minutes it looked as if the wait would be another hour. Others who had gone through the line told them that they wouldn’t get their results until five days later, a Monday, at the earliest. They were planning to travel the next day, so they gave up.
“Monday would have been useless, so we left the line, ” said Schumacher.
The number of infections shown in the United States exceeded 4.7 million, with new inconsistent instances with approximately 60,000 consistent with the day on average, to more than 70,000 at the time of July.
U.S. controls They are mainly based on very delicate molecular controls that stumble upon the genetic code of the coronavirus. Although control is seen as the benchmark for accuracy, experts increasingly say that the country’s overburdened lab formula cannot keep up with the epidemic and produce effects in two or 3 days, the time to isolate patients and engage the virus.
“They’re doing as good a job as they possibly can do, but the current system will not allow them to keep up with the demand,” said Mara Aspinall of Arizona State University’s College of Health Solutions.
Test delays have led researchers at Harvard and elsewhere to propose a new antigenic testing technique, an immediate generation already used to detect influenza, strep pharyngotics and other non-unusual infections. Instead of detecting the virus itself, these tests look for viral proteins or antigens, which are sometimes considered a less accurate measure of infection.
Several corporations are Covid-19 antigen tests in which you spit on a specially coated strip of paper, and if infected, adjust the color. Experts say the speed and widespread availability of these tests would more than offset their lower accuracy.
Although in the U.S. market There is no such control for coronavirus, experts say that generation is undeniable and that barriers are more regulatory than technical. Harvard researchers say production can temporarily succeed in millions.
A proposal from Harvard researchers calls on the federal government to distribute saliva-based antigenic controls of $1 to all Americans so that they can control themselves regularly, if at all.
Even with accuracy as low as 50%, the researchers estimate that paper strip tests would reveal five times as many Cases of Covid-19 than the existing lab-based approach, which the federal government says detects one in 10 infections.
But he faces resistance in Washington, where federal regulators have demanded at least 80% accuracy for the new Covid-19 tests.
“O item.title”