In the reds
Download the Voice app
December 6, 2021,
An organization of parents who oppose vaccination against the coronavirus filed an appeal before the federal court of Córdoba against the president, Alberto Fernández, and the Minister of Health, Carla Vizzotti, to vaccinate young people between 3 and 11 years old. Training
The amparo filed through the lawyer María Lucrecia Alvarado and radicalized in Federal Court No. 3, through Miguel Hugo Vaca Narvaja, came to fruition when Vizzotti announced the approval of the use of the Sinopharm vaccine for children.
La letrada ya había presentado una denuncia penal contra el Presidente, Vizzotti y su antecesor, Ginés González García, por presunto fraude, incumplimiento de los deberes de funcionario, abuso de autoridad y lesiones gravísimas.
He reported that Fernández “agreed on legal immunity and confidentiality clause” with the vaccine supplier laboratories so that Argentines can carry out a “trial. “
La finalidad del amparo, según explicaron, es “detener la mal llamada vacunación en niños de 3 a 11 años que se está llevando a cabo sin consentimiento debidamente informado y veraz del carácter experimental, y de todos los posibles efectos adversos –inclusive la muerte– que de ello pudieren derivar”.
Former anti-vaccine: investigate his report and find out if you want to know more about the suitability of a tax collector
Please let the government use “experimental computers” in the villages via “fraud, low threat and vaccine threat,” when the vaccine presented in the country does constitute prevention and immunity.
Along these lines, they ensure that the vaccines go through the 3rd level of the four stages that will have to be met, because “there is no turning back – he indicates – not even remotely the criteria of a vaccine itself. And the State does not only have it in the form of recklessness, so notoriously painful, because it is surely conscientious and complicit with those who are incubating.
“Not only is it painful because it threatens the quality of the livelihoods that supply its citizens (if they have a lack of vaccination and do not save them from the contagion of Covid-19 superinfection), if it undertakes not to supply the call for “informed consent” to everything that is done voluntarily in the face of a remedy of these experimental type characteristics,” he states.
Los amparistas consideraron que la vacunación anticoronavirus es “un enorme experimento humano” para “averiguar los efectos de diferentes sustancias que se inyectan”. “Y una buena parte del éxito del plan consiste en ocultar a la población estas circunstancias”, opinaron.
And the enthusiasm is that vaccination will be extended to different groups of educators, “at the request of the laboratories and against the indications of the World Health Organization (WHO),” which motivated the presentation of the protection.
Al respecto, la abogada recordó que la ministra de Salud explicó que la aprobación fue recomendada por la Administración Nacional de Medicamentos, Alimentos y Tecnología Médica (Anmat), tras la información recibida por el laboratorio chino y los estudios realizados en los Emiratos Árabes.
La Organización Mundial de la Salud, según publicó Clarín, planteó sus reparos sobre el uso de la vacuna de Sinopharm en chicos. A comienzos de septiembre, aseguró que había que esperar “estudios que proporcionen resultados relativos a ese grupo de edad”.
Alvarado recorded that, in his query on this point, Vizzotti did not respond to this observation by the WHO, however he maintained that “he said that he had analyzed the Anmat, and that he had noted with all the regulatory entities, that it was only all the data of immunogenicity”. . and the protection of its workers and the use of its vaccines. “
“This investigation does not know who did it – he stated through the lawyer – nor about the clinical evidence, upset by what was found in phase 2-3 of the Sinopharm injection, it does not have a guilty answer, because only those vaccines are through of the owners and manufacturers, but which, in fact, are transformed in a mandatory manner”.
Por su parte, recordó el decreto 125/21, que dispuso el primer confinamiento y la vacunación en el país, en el que se mencionó que la Argentina había sido “seleccionada como parte de los países en los que se efectúan los ensayos clínicos para, al menos, cuatro de las vacunas para Covid-19 (…)”.
“The State itself recognizes (…) that this entire vaccination giant intends to impose itself on others as mandatory, from discriminatory behavior against those who, despite proving to be healthy, have refused to be inoculated, it is an experiment that in the most productive In this case, it will most likely be used to meet with priests, and not for a cure itself,” he remarked.
In addition, given that Law 27,573 created a Reparation Fund with the aim of “paying compensation to human persons who caused damage to physical condition as a direct consequence of the application of the vaccine intended to generate acquired immunity against the coronavirus, according to the regulation.
“Actually, this is a solution experiment that favors the popularity of the character state, since there is less risk of inoculation, which is reported,” he said. he stated.
Alvarado, likewise, idea that the “mother imposition” of indicating whether or not someone had received a vaccine “is a violation of the rights arising from foreign treaties, the data referring to suitability are considered reasonable, in terms of Personal Data”. Protection Law 25,326 and that is why it is strict confidentiality. “
It denounces the “threat of investigation, in the case of someone not wearing glasses, with a remedy in the experimental phase – to restrict rights (. . . ) to work, to exercise literary, circulating, assembly, devotional freedom (. . . ) – the result is illegal, the suitor with it registers the expansion of the universe of vaccinated with an experimental and supposedly non-mandatory remedy,” he said.
And he considers that this represents, for his judge, “an action sanctioned” through the Penal Code, because “those who dictate the imposition are perfectly aware of the experimental nature and the threat of the misleading name of ‘vaccination’ or of the ignorant with imaginable malice”.
Por su parte, la abogada también señaló que el mismo Gobierno en su web menciona “una serie de contraindicaciones y de prevenciones, así como de efectos adversos”, demostrando que las vacunas “no son seguras ni eficaces a corto plazo y que sobre todo ello no es debidamente informado a la sociedad, ni a los niños, sin haber facilitado a la ciudadanía en su totalidad la información accesible, debida, cabal y completa sobre la inoculaciones para el Covid-19″.
“¿Qué padre, sabiendo esto, expondría a su hijo a la posibilidad de sufrir efectos adversos en muchos casos, sino en todos, irreversibles? ¿Qué autoridad judicial requerida (…) omitiría hacerlo?”, preguntó.
La amparista recordó que la ley 17.732 de Deontología Médica estipula la obligatoriedad de respetar la voluntad del paciente cuando no quiera ser tratado y citó los fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia cuando falló a favor de dos pacientes testigos de Jehová que rechazaron transfusiones de sangre. El máximo tribunal resolvió que no podían ser obligados por los médicos a recibirlas (en ambos casos, sobrevivieron sin transfusiones sanguíneas).
And transparent, furthermore, that in the remedy of an experimental trial phase, parents cannot give informed consent (the patient’s voluntary declaration while receiving transparent and accurate data on the remedy, etc. ), established by the patient’s law to he. same, without participation of the Ombudsman for Children and Adolescents and limited capacity. The Patients Law establishes that all patients will have to be attentive and, in addition, they will be able to choose the remedy they wish to receive.
“It is said that it is to download judicial authorization to treat a phase 2-3 experimental clinical trial,” he said.
De esta forma, reclamaron al juez que suspenda preventivamente el plan de vacunación contra el Covid-19 en chicos de entre 3 y 11 años hasta que los ciudadanos sepan de qué se trata de el “experimento” y los posibles riesgos, y hasta que se brinde información veraz para obtener un consentimiento informado.
Every week there are 10 young people from Córdoba between 3 and 11 years old with a dose of vaccine against Covid-19.
There are a total of 308,011 children between the ages of 3 and 11, out of a total population that the provincial fitness government estimates at just over one million people. Strictly speaking, those vaccinated constitute 58. 8% of the projected population.
The percentage is a little lower for those who download apps. 19. 4% of the children are in this segment and have already completed treatment. There are 101,706 children and young people.
Four reasons to oppose Covid-19 for young people and adolescents
Con respecto al reporte del Ministerio de Salud de la semana pasada esta cifra prácticamente se duplicó. El porcentaje informado el viernes 12 de noviembre arrojaba que el 9,4 por ciento había sido vacunado con las dos dosis.
Among adolescents between 12 and 17 years old, those 75 years old are partially immune. However, 35 years are vaccines against Covid-19. Array
00:38
01:09
00:11
01:24
La Voz del Interior. Founded on March 15, 1904. LaVoz. com. ar. Launched on September 21, 1996. Year 28. Edition N° 10351. Intellectual Registry 56057581.
Legal address: La Voz del Interior 6080 – Zip: X5008HKJ – Córdoba, Argentina. Owner: La Voz del Interior SA. General Manager: Juan Tillard. Director: Carlos Hugo Jornet. Editor: Carlos Hugo Jornet.
© 1ninenine6 – 2025 All rights reserved. Legal Realization | Privacy Policy – Contact us on 0800 555 286 nine, Monday to Friday from nine to 17, or via WhatsApp at 54 nine 351 884 2000