In our recent special legislative session, I brought an invoice (HB11) to eliminate the force that the State of New Mexico has lately to force others, at risk of space arrest, to vaccinate others who oppose their will in the event of a public fitness crisis.
The governor allowed my law to be heard.
At the time, I spoke to many other people who thought my considerations were alarmist.Unfortunately, no one can think about that now.
Last Thursday, at Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s weekly COVID-19 briefing, she said she planned to make the COVID-19 vaccine mandatory for retirement home residents, fitness workers, educators, lifeguards, and correctional populations.the vaccine is also being considered for schoolchildren.
Now that everyone has to take the risk of compulsory vaccination seriously, let’s look at the implications of such a policy.
First, I will have to say that compulsory vaccination against COVID and medical freedom are mutually exclusive.Forcing other healthy people to take a vaccine at risk of legal action is a mistake.The government cannot force you to have medical surgery or inject yourself.anything in your frame that opposes your will.
In the case of this specific vaccine, if approved and produced, we will deal with a substance issue for hasty approval.With potentially unknown side effects, I would be very careful to force such a vaccine into a giant population, including my confidence in medicine.Freedom.
Compulsory vaccines would possibly also violate the devoted freedom rights of others who have devout objections to vaccination, namely vaccines made with fetal mobile phones. Any prospective vaccine opposed to coronavirus can also be derived from fetal moving lines, but this remains uncertain.
I am also involved in the economic effects of such a policy on teachers, police, doctors and other professionals who decide to leave the state if they face the prospect of compulsory vaccination.If Governor Grisham helps keep her promise, she would possibly have to take the vaccine or abandon the practice of medicine in New Mexico.And I probably wouldn’t take a vaccine with such a high chance of unknown side effects.
But I would like to mention another explanation as to why compulsory vaccination is dangerous.At the end of the session, I won a call from a lobbyist from a giant pharmaceutical company, which was involved in even drafting such a law.because pharmaceutical corporations deserve to gain more advantages than anyone else from compulsory vaccines.We’ve noticed this kind of corruption in state policy before: in 2007, Texas Gov. Rick Perry signed an executive order ordering every 11 and 12 years older women in the state to get the HPV vaccine.It was later revealed that not only had the company that produced the vaccine make a very large donation to Perry, but his former staff leader had a lobbyist for the same company.
Pharmaceutical corporations produce life-saving drugs for which I am incredibly grateful, but do not receive monetary and political strength at the expense of individual freedom.
I am a doctor and do not oppose vaccines; I think most of the vaccines used today are incredibly beneficial, but the ultimate productive tool and the only tool that deserves to be used in a relaxed society is persuasion, there’s no very wide gap between “recommended” and “required,” and that’s an abyss that Americans don’t cross.