\n \n \n “. concat(self. i18n. t(‘search. voice. recognition_retry’), “\n
Chinese factories were closed beyond August, a common occurrence in a country that has imposed intermittent shutdowns to combat the coronavirus. But this time, the culprit was not the pandemic. Instead, a record drought has crippled economic activity in southwest China. freeze chains of foreign origin for cars, electronics and other goods that have been interrupted during the last 3 years.
Such disruptions may soon become more common for companies sourcing parts and products from around the world, as climate change and the accompanying extreme weather events continue to disrupt the global commodity delivery formula in highly unpredictable ways, economists and industry experts warn.
Much remains to be known about how immediate global warming will affect agriculture, economic activity and industry in the coming decades. But a clear trend is that herbal mistakes like droughts, hurricanes, and wildfires are becoming more common and taking positions in more positions. Those mistakes are very likely to wreak sporadic havoc on global supply chains, exacerbating shortages, delivery delays, and emerging costs that have frustrated businesses and consumers.
Sign up for The Morning newsletter from the New York Times
“What you just experienced with COVID is a window into what the climate can do,” said Kyle Meng, an associate professor in the Bren School of Environmental Science and Management and the Department of Economics at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
The chains that have expanded around the world in recent decades are fashion efficiency studies, powering products like electronics, chemicals, sofas and food across continents and oceans at ever-lower costs.
But those networks have been shown to be fragile, first by the pandemic and then in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, with corporations struggling to obtain goods amid factory and port closures. With product shortages, costs have skyrocketed, fueling immediate inflation around the world.
Drought in southwest China has also affected global business. It has drastically reduced hydroelectric power generation in the region, requiring power outages in factories and coded chains for electronics, auto parts and other products. Volkswagen and Toyota have cut production at nearby plants, including Foxconn, which produces electronics, and CATL, a maker of batteries for electric cars.
The Yangtze River, which divides China in half, sank so much that offshore ships crossing its upper course from rainy summer to early winter can no longer sail.
Companies struggled to get safe trucks to get their goods to Chinese ports, while Chinese food importers sought more trucks and trains to ship their shipments within the country. The heat and drought have withered a lot of vegetables in southwest China, almost doubling prices, and It is difficult for surviving pigs and poultry to gain weight, which raises meat prices.
Recent rains have temporarily restored power to homes and businesses in western China. But drought persists in much of central and western China, and reservoirs remain at a third of their previous level.
This means less water only for hydroelectric power, but also for the region’s chemical plants and coal-fired power plants, which need large amounts of water to cool down.
China has even turned to drones to seed clouds with silver iodide in an effort to cause more rain, Zhao Zhiqiang, deputy director of the China Meteorological Administration’s Climate Modification Center, said at a news conference on Tuesday.
At the same time, the coronavirus and China’s insistence on a ZERO COVID policy continue to pose dangers to the chain of origin by being restricted to vital parts of the country. Last Thursday, the Chinese government shut down Chengdu, a city of more than 21 million people. in southwest China, to quell coronavirus outbreaks.
These common disruptions in Chinese production and logistics have raised consideration among world leaders and lawmakers that many of the world’s factories are too geographically concentrated, making them vulnerable to pandemics and natural disasters.
The Biden administration, in a plan released Tuesday outlining how the U. S. plans its semiconductor industry, said the existing concentration of chipmakers in Southeast Asia has made the industry vulnerable to disruptions due to climate change, as well as pandemics and wars.
But setting up factories in other parts of the world to offset those dangers can be costly for both businesses and consumers, to whom corporations will pass on their costs in the form of higher costs. Just as the pandemic has led to higher costs for consumers, Meng said climate replacement can also occur, especially if excessive weather affects large portions of the world at the same time.
Companies may also face new costs similar to carbon taxes when shipping goods across borders, as well as higher transportation costs to transport goods by sea or air, experts say. Maritime and air transport are the main fuel manufacturers contributing to climate change. they account for about 5% of global carbon emissions. Companies in both sectors are temporarily looking for cleaner fuel sources, but this transition will likely require gigantic investments that can increase costs for their customers.
Natural mistakes and coronavirus shutdowns in China have been particularly painful, given that the country is home to much of the world’s manufacturing industry. But the U. S. The U. S. has also felt the growing effects of extreme weather.
A multi-year drought in much of the western United States affected U. S. agricultural exports. Wildfires on the West Coast have blurred logistics for corporations like Amazon. Winter storms and blackouts forced semiconductor plants in Texas to close last year, exacerbating chip shortages.
White House economists warned in a report this year that climate change would make long-term disruptions to global supply chains more common, and brought to light studies that seem to indicate that the global frequency of herbal errors has nearly tripled in recent decades.
“As networks become more connected and the weather worsens, the frequency and length of errors in the source chain increase,” the report says.
The National Centers for Environmental Information, a federal agency, estimate that the number of billion-dollar errors that occur each year in the United States has skyrocketed to an average of 20 over the past two years, adding up to serious storms, cyclones and floods. In the 1980s, there were only about 3 a year.
Academics say the effect of those mistakes and emerging temperatures in general will be evident when it comes to food trade. Parts of the world, such as Russia, Scandinavia and Canada, can produce more grains and other food crops to feed countries. as global temperatures rise.
But those production centers would be farther away from the warmer, densely populated spaces near the equator. Some of these regions can combat poverty and lack of food confidence even more than they do lately.
One of the risks is that the expansion of the food festival may simply inspire countries to introduce protectionist policies that limit or prevent food exports, as some have done in reaction to the pandemic and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. These export constraints allow a country to feed its own population still has a tendency to exacerbate shortages abroad and drive up food prices, further aggravating the problem.
The World Trade Organization, mentioning the damage that protectionist policies can cause, suggested countries keep industry open to combat the negative effects of climate change.
In a 2018 report, the WTO noted that the global food industry is vulnerable to shipping disruptions that can occur simply due to climate change, such as the emergence of sea degrees that threaten ports or excessive weather situations that degrade roads and bridges. Industrial grains go through at least one of the world’s 14 “bottlenecks,” adding the Panama Canal, the Strait of Malacca or the Black Sea rail network, according to the report.
WTO Director-General Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala described the industry as “an adaptation and resilience mechanism” that can help countries cope with crop problems and natural disasters. contribution to severe malnutrition, with up to 55 million other people at risk by 2050 due to local effects on food production. But a larger industry could reduce that number through another 35 million people, he said.
“Trade is a component of the demanding situations we face, much more than a component of the problem,” Okonjo-Iweala said.
Solomon Hsiang, a senior lecturer in public policy at the University of California, Berkeley and co-director of the Climate Impact Lab, agreed that industry can make the world more resilient and vulnerable to such disasters.
In some situations, the industry can mitigate the effects of climate substitution, for example, by allowing communities to import food when local crops fail due to drought, he said.
“It’s on the right side of the ledger,” Hsiang said. “But the problem is that, as everyone knows all too well, we are so interconnected across our supply chains that sometimes in one global aspect they can have a dramatic effect on the well-being of people elsewhere. “
© 2022 The New York Times Company