Chinese stocks plunge and lead global markets lower as investors weigh escalating US-China tensions running beyond ‘mere tariffs’

Kyodo News/Getty

Global markets slid on Friday amid mounting geopolitical tensions between the US and China, after Beijing ordered the closure of a US consulate in the city of Chengdu.

China’s benchmark Shanghai index fell 3.8% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng dropped 2.3%. Futures tied to the S&P 500 fell 0.5% in European trade Friday.

Of the move, China’s foreign ministry spokesperson said in a tweet: “This is a legitimate & necessary response to the unilateral provocative move by the US to demand the closure of China’s Consulate General in Houston.”

Both unemployment figures and slow progress on the next US fiscal stimulus package are likely to have contributed to the fall in US stocks.

The latest US jobless claims, totalling 1.42 million, marked the first increase in 15 weeks. The number was above Bloomberg consensus estimates of 1.3 million. 

Read More: An Andreessen Horowitz partner explains 3 big cybersecurity trends that are winning out because of COVID-19 – and the hardest part about starting a new company during the crisis

“Today China is increasingly authoritarian at home, and more aggressive in its hostility to freedom everywhere else,” he said.

In response to his speech, China’s spokesperson said: “What he is doing is as futile as an ant trying to shake a tree.” 

Pompeo also reportedly said in a private meeting with UK politicians that the head of the World Health Organisation, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, was “bought by the Chinese government.”

“Markets can now contemplate a serious escalation in US-China tensions that runs far beyond the risk of mere tariffs; and of a looming lurch lower in the US economy, which might necessitate even more focus on foreign policy as a distraction,” Rabobank analysts said in a note.

Here’s the market roundup as of 12.55 p.m. in London (7.55 a.m. ET):

Read More: Bernstein says buy these 13 dividend-rich stocks built to capitalize on a trend not seen in 65 years

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *